24 states sue to stop new Postal Service ballot rules


Full story

Twenty-four states and Washington, D.C., have gone to federal court seeking to stop new Postal Service requirements for mail ballots before the November midterms.

President Donald Trump directed the Postal Service in a March executive order to tighten requirements for handling mail ballots, and the agency later adopted the changes.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

The rule would create state-specific Postal Service lists using information supplied by election officials, including the names and addresses of voters set to receive mail ballots. It would also impose new envelope standards, including trackable bar codes.

USPS says decisions about voter eligibility, maintaining voter rolls and counting ballots would remain outside the agency.

The lawsuit argues that USPS is taking on election functions it has no legal authority to perform and that the changes could prevent some eligible voters from successfully casting mail ballots.

States say complying with the rule would require rapid changes to ballot materials and technology, along with new training for election workers and instructions for voters. The complaint also says ballot mail that does not meet the new requirements could be withheld from delivery.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta said election administration belongs to the states under the Constitution, not to the White House or Postal Service.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta speaks after a hearing about Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco’s seizure and recount of more than half a million 2025 election ballots on Monday, Aug. 24, 2026, at California Supreme Court in San Francisco. (Alicia Ramirez/The Riverside Record, Pool)

The White House called the changes “commonsense measures” and said they would strengthen mail-ballot security and ensure only eligible Americans vote.

The latest case follows a Supreme Court ruling that found the states had challenged Trump’s order too early. At the time, USPS had not yet adopted the final rule now at issue.

The ruling lifted the earlier block without deciding whether the final rule itself is legal.

The states are now seeking an injunction in Massachusetts federal court to keep the rule on hold while the case plays out.

Round out your reading

Tags: , , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal lawsuit by 24 states and D.C. puts new Postal Service mail ballot rules in legal dispute ahead of the November midterms, directly affecting how eligible voters can cast ballots by mail.

Mail ballot delivery at risk

The states' complaint says ballot mail that does not meet the new envelope and bar code standards could be withheld from delivery, according to the lawsuit.

Voter materials may change

States say compliance would require rapid changes to ballot materials, new technology, updated worker training and new instructions for voters before the midterms.

Legal outcome still unresolved

A prior Supreme Court ruling lifted an earlier block without deciding whether the final rule is lawful, leaving its status unsettled while the injunction request is pending.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Trump’s mail-voting order as an “attack” that could “disenfranchise millions,” stressing voter barriers, federal overreach, and renewed legal “challenges."
  • Media outlets in the center emphasize procedural chronology and uncertainty.
  • Media outlets on the right portray the same rules as election-security “safeguards,” casts the states’ suit as obstruction, and celebrates a “major victory” after the injunction was lifted.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

267 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Democratic-Led states and voting rights groups filed a new lawsuit challenging a U.S. Postal Service rule limiting mail-in voting, arguing it is unconstitutional and an overreach of federal power over state-run elections.
  • U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani lifted a nationwide injunction blocking the mail-in voting restrictions, citing a Supreme Court decision that found prior challenges premature, but noted the order is likely unconstitutional and could cause chaos.
  • The USPS rule mandates states to use uniform ballot envelopes and share voter data federally, which opponents argue burdens election administration and voter access ahead of the 2026 midterms.
  • The Trump administration defends the rule as a security measure to protect mail-in voting integrity, while opponents contend it infringes on states' constitutional authority and threatens voters' rights.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Wednesday, a coalition of 24 Democratic attorneys general and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro sued the U.S. Postal Service to block its newly published 'Ballot Mail for Federal Elections' rule restricting mail-in voting.
  • This legal action follows the Supreme Court's August 24 decision to pause an earlier injunction, ruling that states' challenges to President Donald Trump's March executive order restricting mail-in voting were premature.
  • States must submit voter lists to a federal portal and obtain approval for ballot envelope designs, which officials warn imposes 'enormous administrative and financial burdens' weeks before the midterms.
  • Plaintiffs seek a temporary restraining order to block the rule, though the Postal Service stated it will not implement changes for the 2026 midterms while other federal injunctions remain active.
  • With the November midterms less than 10 weeks away, this litigation reflects the constitutional friction between federal directives and states' authority to administer elections, leaving officials facing operational uncertainty.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and attorneys general from 23 states and Washington, D.C., filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Postal Service over a Trump-backed mail-ballot rule imposing federal requirements on mail voting for the November midterm elections.
  • The USPS rule requires election officials to submit voter information to a USPS portal, mandates ballot envelope pre-approval, and establishes trackable barcodes; the states argue this unlawfully involves USPS in election administration and exceeds its authority.
  • The coalition contends the rule violates the Constitution by shifting election control from states to USPS, forcing changes close to the midterms, and bypassing procedural reviews, and thus seeks a court block of the rule.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court stayed an earlier injunction against the mail voting rule due to a premature challenge but allowed states to sue after the final rule was published, which led to this lawsuit.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™