25 states file lawsuit against Trump administration over SNAP funding


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Lawsuit

More than two dozen states filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after it said it could not legally fund food stamps throughout the government shutdown.

USDA response

The Agriculture Department previously said it could reprogram reserves to prevent benefit cuts, but reversed course on Friday.

Other funding issues

SNAP is not the only program facing a funding lapse amid the shutdown, but the administration has tapped reserves in other instances.


Full story

More than two dozen states have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after it said it cannot legally fund food stamps throughout the government shutdown. The lawsuit asks a federal judge to force Washington to use emergency reserves to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), according to The New York Times.

The lawsuit comes after the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced Friday that it would not use emergency funds to preserve food stamps. The department previously stated that it could reprogram reserves to prevent benefit cuts. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The lawsuit

Officials from 25 states and the District of Columbia filed the lawsuit, which criticizes the Trump administration for its sudden reversal. It argues that the federal government had a legal obligation to maintain food stamps by any means necessary.

The lawsuit specifically asks the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts to rule on a motion that would force the administration to tap contingency funds to pay November SNAP benefits. 

According to The Times, the fund is estimated to contain $5 billion to $6 billion and would be enough to provide at least partial payments to roughly 42 million enrollees. 

“The USDA has funds to stop people from starving, but instead, it’s playing politics. It’s wrong,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said on X. 

Washington D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb posted his own comment, saying, “We will do everything we can to prevent DC families from going hungry.”

In an earlier memo, the Department of Agriculture said that the contingency funds needed to back SNAP benefits were “not legally available” during a government shutdown. It reportedly said the reserves can be tapped only in emergencies, such as natural disasters or to backfill deficits to appropriated benefits. 

The Times reports roughly 1 in 8 people in the U.S. receive food stamps. That averages out to approximately $187 a month, costing the federal government about $8 billion monthly. 

Lack of funding

The administration’s decision not to tap funds for SNAP differs from that of another federal nutrition initiative directed to women, infants and children, referred to as WIC, which is currently funded by tariff revenue. The administration also tapped reserves to pay military officials throughout the shutdown. 

SNAP is not the only program facing funding problems. The National Head Start Association — a nonprofit that provides early learning to low-income children and families — said several of its grants will end Friday, eliminating funding for 134 programs.

Government shutdown continues

As the government shutdown heads toward a fifth week, the issue among senators remains the same. Republicans want a so-called clean continuing resolution that extends Biden-era appropriations. Democrats won’t sign onto any resolution that doesn’t undo the “Big Beautiful Bill’s” changes to Obamacare tax credits and Medicaid reimbursement limitations.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The lawsuit by more than two dozen states against the Trump administration over the suspension of food assistance during the government shutdown highlights legal, humanitarian and political conflicts surrounding federally funded nutrition aid for millions of Americans.

Government shutdown impact

Millions of Americans face the temporary loss of food assistance as the government shutdown halts SNAP benefits, raising significant concerns about food insecurity and social welfare.

Legal and policy dispute

The lawsuit centers on whether the USDA is legally required to use contingency funds to continue SNAP benefits, with states arguing federal law mandates continued assistance during funding lapses.

Political blame and division

Officials and agencies offer conflicting views about responsibility for the suspension of benefits, reflecting broader political divisions over government funding priorities and responses to public assistance needs.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 28 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Approximately 42 million Americans rely on SNAP benefits each month. Reports indicate $5 billion to $6 billion in contingency funds are available, but the program requires an estimated $9.2 billion to fully fund November benefits.

Context corner

SNAP, previously known as food stamps, is a long-standing federal aid program created to combat food insecurity among low-income Americans. States distribute the benefits monthly with federally appropriated funding.

History lesson

In previous government shutdowns, contingency funds were reportedly used for a limited time to continue SNAP benefits. The first interruption of benefits in the program's 60-year history could occur in November.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the issue as a negative "suspension" of benefits by the Trump administration, often using terms like "looming" to evoke concern.
  • Media outlets in the center acknowledge the lawsuit by 25 states over SNAP benefits for 40 million Americans during a shutdown, and uniquely detail the $6 billion contingency funds argument.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize the USDA and report its justification that the "well has run dry," blaming Senate Democrats for the shutdown, and highlighting accusations of "illegally cutting off" aid.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

128 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A coalition of attorneys general and governors from 25 states sued the Trump administration over the suspension of SNAP benefits, claiming the action was unlawful and unnecessary as contingency funds are available.
  • The lawsuit, filed in Boston federal court, argues that halting SNAP benefits without using available funds violates the Food and Nutrition Act, which mandates assistance for eligible households.
  • Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell stated the administration is creating "needless fear, angst and harm for millions of families" as benefits are set to lapse amid the government shutdown.
  • Democratic-led states seek urgent court intervention to ensure SNAP benefits continue without disruption, warning that this situation would be unprecedented in the program's 60-year history.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Tuesday, attorneys general and governors from 25 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit in Boston federal court to block the SNAP suspension starting Nov. 1, after the USDA said no benefits would be issued.
  • On Saturday, the USDA updated its website saying no benefits would be issued on Nov. 1, noting "the well has run dry." Tuesday's lawsuit contends this suspension violates the Food and Nutrition Act.
  • SNAP serves more than 41 million low-income Americans and the shutdown also threatens nearly 7 million WIC participants, with eligibility under 130% of the federal poverty line and $2,215 for a two-person household.
  • The states are seeking a rapid court order to force the USDA to use contingency funds for November SNAP benefits, while California, New York and Virginia announced emergency funding and declarations.
  • Plaintiffs warn this would be a first in SNAP's 60-year history as Democrats and Republicans in Congress trade blame amid the government shutdown.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and 22 other attorneys general sued the United States Department of Agriculture, claiming illegal suspension of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program during the shutdown.
  • The lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order to block the USDA from halting SNAP operations, arguing that the agency has access to a contingency fund.
  • Gov. Tim Walz mentioned that $4 million in state funding was allocated to food shelves, but he said it could not replace the $74 million in federal SNAP funding Minnesota receives monthly.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.