28 migrants charged for crossing into new military southern border zone


Summary

Criminal charges

U.S. authorities have initiated criminal prosecutions against approximately 28 immigrants illegally in the U.S. for entering a newly established military buffer zone along the southern border, with potentially severe fines and prison time.

New buffer zone

The Trump administration has created a new military buffer zone in New Mexico of over 110,000 acres of federal land, allowing U.S. troops to detain migrants.

Defense Secretary comments

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the buffer zone as a strategy to combat illegal immigration, warning that anyone entering the military area could face serious legal consequences.


Summary

Criminal charges

U.S. authorities have initiated criminal prosecutions against approximately 28 immigrants illegally in the U.S. for entering a newly established military buffer zone along the southern border, with potentially severe fines and prison time.

New buffer zone

The Trump administration has created a new military buffer zone in New Mexico of over 110,000 acres of federal land, allowing U.S. troops to detain migrants.

Defense Secretary comments

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the buffer zone as a strategy to combat illegal immigration, warning that anyone entering the military area could face serious legal consequences.


Full story

U.S. authorities said they began the first criminal prosecutions against immigrants illegally in the U.S. accused of entering a new military buffer zone along the southern border. Roughly 28 migrants are reportedly charged with “violations of security regulations” for crossing into the designated military area. The violation, although a misdemeanor, may carry a fine of up to $100,000 per person and potentially up to one year in prison.

What happened?

The migrants were charged after reportedly entering the 170-mile-long military zone in New Mexico, according to court filings obtained by Reuters. The establishment of the new buffer zone gives U.S. troops in the area the authority to detain migrants found there and hand them over to U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents or other law enforcement officials.

Why are these the first charges?

The penalty for illegal border crossings is typically less severe, but the Trump administration is working to deter unlawful entry into the United States. The charges revealed on Monday, April 28, are made possible in part by the creation of the “New Mexico National Defense” area on April 18.

What is the new area operated by the Department of Defense?

As Straight Arrow News reported, the Department of Defense had the U.S. Army’s Fort Huachuca expanded to include nearly 110,000 acres of federal land, which until last week belonged to the Department of the Interior. The land transfer is reportedly in effect for three years and creates a buffer zone along the U.S.-Mexico border.

The area is traditionally known as a route many asylum seekers and migrants use to illegally cross into the U.S.  Crossing into a military zone carries more serious penalties than a charge of a typical illegal border crossing, which is what the Trump administration hopes will deter people from coming into the U.S. unlawfully. 

What is Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth saying?

On Friday, April 25, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited the newly created buffer zone, where he called it the latest tool employed by the Trump administration to combat what he called an “invasion” of immigrants illegally in the U.S.

“Clear English, clear Spanish,” Hegseth said. “This is Department of Defense property, the national defense area, formerly known as the Fort Huachuca annex zone, is federal property. Any illegal attempting to enter that zone is entering a military base, a federal, protected area,” Hegseth added. “You can be detained. You will be detained. You will be interdicted by U.S. troops and border patrol working together.”

Hegseth also said that any person who cuts fences may face charges of destroying government property, and if they try to run, they could be charged with evading arrest. Those charges together, Hegseth stated, could lead to as long as a decade in prison.

How are critics responding?

Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Amnesty International are opposed to the newly created military zone, saying troops should not be used to arrest people for regular misdemeanor offenses, and warns that these actions raise the potential that a U.S. citizen could face charges if caught trespassing in the newly established buffer zone. 

Rebecca Sheff, a lawyer with the ACLU, told Al-Jazeera, “We don’t want militarized zones where border residents — including U.S. citizens — face potential prosecution for being in the wrong place.” Sheff also said the “New Mexico National Defense Area … represents a dangerous erosion of the constitutional principle that the military should not be policing civilians.”

Beyond those concerns, the ACLU maintains that the U.S. has legal obligations under both domestic and international law to respect the inalienable rights of migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers.

What actions have past administrations taken?

Previous presidential administrations have also tried to limit the flow of asylum seekers by ordering migrants seeking refuge to only do so at official U.S. ports of entry. Past administrations have also warned of enhanced punishments as one of the tools at their disposal to limit illegal entries into the United States.

What is happening at the border?

The military zone allows the Trump administration to detain immigrants illegally in the U.S. without employing the Insurrection Act of 1807, which allows the president to deploy the U.S. military in the event of civil unrest. The last time the act was used came during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.

Evan Hummel (Producer) and Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

An escalation in U.S. efforts to deter illegal border crossings could far-reaching implications for migrants trying to enter the United States.

Legal implications

The introduction of severe criminal penalties for immigrants illegally in the U.S. crossing into a newly designated military area raises legal concerns regarding the treatment of migrants and asylum-seekers along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Military involvement

The establishment of a military buffer zone along the border represents a controversial shift in how the U.S. government addresses immigration, potentially blurring the lines between military and civilian law enforcement.

Civil liberties

Critics, including legal and civil rights organizations, expressed concerns over the erosion of civil liberties and the potential for the militarization of the border. They say this shift could lead to abusive practices against migrants and infringe on the rights of U.S. citizens.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 44 media outlets

Common ground

Both left and right-leaning articles report on the established of the New Mexico National Defense Area, a militarized zone where migrants face new prosecutions for unauthorized entry. The articles note the Trump administration's heightened security measures on the border, including the deployment of military forces.

Community reaction

Local communities, particularly advocacy groups, have expressed alarm regarding the militarization of border zones. The ACLU of New Mexico voiced concerns about erosion of civilian oversight, fearing that residents could face legal repercussions for inadvertently entering these areas.

Diverging views

The left-leaning articles emphasize the potential constitutional violations posed by military involvement in civilian law enforcement. Right-leaning articles often highlight the need for strict border enforcement, suggesting a military presence on the border is critical to protect national security.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the border situation as a "novel" and potentially unjust charge against migrants, emphasizing the "militarized border zone" and highlighting concerns about the military policing civilians, drawing on ACLU criticisms.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize "illegal immigrants" being "snagged" entering a military zone, focusing on law enforcement and border security with the Department of Justice prosecutions.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

59 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • President Donald Trump transferred control of the Roosevelt Reservation to the military, allowing troops to arrest migrants as trespassers in the designated area.
  • Migrants in the New Mexico National Defense Area now face a criminal charge for unauthorized entry, as the Army is authorized to temporarily apprehend trespassers.
  • The move to militarize the border area is part of a strategy to increase patrols and enforce security without violating the Posse Comitatus Act.
  • ACLU attorney Rebecca Sheff criticized the military involvement, stating it erodes constitutional principles against military policing of civilians.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Immigrants in New Mexico face new criminal charges for breaching a national defense area, as U.S. Army oversight increases along the border.
  • Federal prosecutors applied charges for incursions into the New Mexico National Defense Area against detained migrants as military deployments grow.
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that unauthorized entry into the military zone will lead to interdiction by U.S. troops and Border Patrol.
  • ACLU attorney Rebecca Sheff warned that the military's presence could lead to the prosecution of U.S. citizens under the same laws.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The U.S. Department of Justice has started prosecuting 28 migrants for illegally crossing a military zone at the U.S.-Mexico border, according to court filings.
  • Migrants face charges for illegally entering a military zone along the U.S.-Mexico border and for crossing into a 170-mile-long buffer zone created by the Trump administration.
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that unauthorized entrants are treated as if they are entering a military base.
  • The ACLU of New Mexico criticized the military involvement as a dangerous erosion of constitutional principles, according to attorney Rebecca Sheff.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™