A national school choice tax credit is coming, but some states are opting out


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

The Trump administration laid out rules for its school choice tax credit coming next January. Some states, most of them Republican-led, are opting into it — while others have been more hesitant. 

Some Democratic governors are joining teachers’ unions in calling the program an attack on the nation’s underfunded public schools. 

Some states already have school choice scholarships — but this is the first federally funded school choice program in the U.S.  It was signed into law last year as part of what President Donald Trump dubbed the “Big Beautiful Bill” Act.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

Under it, taxpayers can claim an annual $1,700, or $3,400 for married couples, if they contribute to approved “Scholarship Granting Organizations” or SGOs. These scholarships can contribute to expenses including private school tuition, as well as other educational expenses.

The U.S. Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service said hundreds of SGOs could benefit from the program by 2030, and an estimated 11 million taxpayers will make nearly $26 billion in qualified contributions annually.

What are the guidelines?

States cannot make SGO requirements more restrictive, put restrictions on what kind of schools scholarship recipients can attend or what kinds of education expenses qualify. 

“The proposed regulations also would not permit a State to use discretionary certification standards to exclude otherwise qualifying SGOs,” the Treasury Department said. 

SGOs are set to be audited every year. Unused tax credits can be forwarded for up to five years. 

Students from low-income families enrolled in government programs, or those in foster care, are automatically eligible for scholarships. Those living in households which make no more than 300% of the area’s median gross income can also get scholarships.

With the rules in place, about 96% of children in states taking part in the program can receive scholarship funds, the Treasury Department said. 

Why are some states opting in and others aren’t?

It’s up to state governors, or “other individual, agency, or entity designated under State law,” to decide whether a state will participate in the tax credit for a calendar year. 

Marty West, a professor and academic dean at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, said in an interview with the school-produced podcast Harvard EdCast that many Republican governors have programs “complementary” to the Trump administration’s in their state. 

“This provides an additional source of funding to allow parents to access a new set of educational options,” he said. 

On the other hand, “Democratic elected officials have tended to be skeptical of private school choice programs, in part, because they view them as a threat to support for and funding of traditional public schools,” he said. 

State and federal public school funding is largely weighted by student attendance. School choice programs allow parents to send their children to a preferred private school, leaving the public school district with one fewer child and less funding. 

Students in public schools still have access to scholarships funded by the tax credit for tutoring, special-needs services, books, supplies, computers and other equipment.

A tracker by Education Week shows 31 states have either opted into the program or plan to. 

Virginia did so under Republican former Gov. Glenn Youngkin. In Kansas, Kentucky and North Carolina, GOP lawmakers overrode Democratic governors’ vetoes. 

When announcing the state’s decision, Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte said that “opting in to this program gives Montanans another incentive to support the success of the next generation.”

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, meanwhile, said Wisconsin won’t participate and vetoed legislation that would have required the state to opt in.

 “Let’s just do the best we can with our public schools,” Evers said in an interview with The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel last year.  “We have plenty of voucher schools. We don’t need voucher money.”

Another Democrat, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, reportedly intends to opt in. Chalkbeat wrote that her office still wants to review the details to make sure there are no “poison pills” before making an official decision. 

A spokesperson for the governor told the publication that “Hochul is supportive of the federal tax credit scholarship and its potential to help New York students and schools.” 

New York State United Teachers President Melinda Pearson argued that the regulations are indeed “loaded with poison pills,” however. 

“If New York opts in, the state would be prohibited from setting standards for scholarship organizations, deciding which organizations can participate, or limiting the types of schools and expenses that receive these federal tax dollars,” she said. “That means New York could be forced to help funnel taxpayer-subsidized dollars to private schools that have admissions policies and practices that would never be acceptable in our public schools, while being denied the authority to put stronger safeguards around the program.”

American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten also put out a statement urging state governors to reject the program, “not least of all because they will have no say or oversight over how the vouchers operate.”

“The reality is that for every precious public dollar funneled to private schools—money that could be spent on instruction, lowering class sizes, modern buildings or new books in the library—public school parents will be hunting for pennies on the floor,” she said. “This isn’t about ‘school choice’; it’s about the school’s choice: Private schools can simply refuse to accept poor kids, those with special needs or those with different religions. And they can refuse to submit to the basic accountability measures their backers hypocritically demand of public schools.”

Trump administration officials maintain the program is helping students gain new opportunities.

“Under President Trump, this Administration continues to transform America’s education system to meet the needs of each student,” U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent said. “The Education Freedom Tax Credit marks a new chapter in educational freedom and opportunity by establishing America’s first nationwide school choice program and empowering states to give students and families more options.”

Round out your reading

Tags: , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.™

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A new federal tax credit, taking effect in January, lets taxpayers reduce their tax bill by contributing to scholarship funds that can pay for private school tuition and other educational expenses — but only in states that opt in.

Tax credit available next year

Taxpayers in participating states can claim up to $1,700 annually ($3,400 for married couples) for contributions to approved scholarship organizations starting in January.

State participation varies

31 states have opted in or plan to; residents of non-participating states, including Wisconsin, are not eligible for the credit regardless of their federal tax situation.

Public school funding at stake

Teachers unions and some Democratic officials contend the program reduces per-student funding for public schools, since state and federal funding is tied to student attendance figures.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 174 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Treasury and IRS project that by 2030 the program could support 600–700 SGOs, draw contributions from more than 11 million taxpayers, generate nearly $26 billion in annual qualified contributions and fund up to 2.2 million scholarships per year. Individual donors can claim up to $1,700; married couples filing jointly can claim up to $3,400.

Community reaction

Public school advocates and teachers unions, including the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association, argue the program diverts resources from public schools. Conversely, Jewish community organizations such as Agudath Israel of America and the Jewish Federations of North America have praised the program, saying it could make Jewish day school more affordable. In Massachusetts, the state association of school superintendents opposes districts creating nonprofits to participate, while some local officials argue public schools need the new funding stream.

Context corner

State-level tax-credit scholarship programs have existed for decades, beginning with Arizona in 1997. According to an Associated Press analysis, in states like Florida and Arizona where such programs were opened to all income levels, the majority of recipients were already enrolled in private or home schools or came from wealthier communities.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.™

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frames the 2025 Education Freedom/Federal Scholarship Tax Credit as a voucher-like redirection of billions in taxpayer money, warning it could weaken public schools and using phrases such as “massive tax and spending law” and “steer billions.”
  • Media outlets in the center bridge the divide with the $1,700 credit, Jan. 1 launch, fraud safeguards and competing claims.
  • Media outlets on the right celebrates a “new era” of “school choice” and “education freedom,” emphasizing parental control, homeschooling, religious education, donor benefits and the consequences of states declining participation.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

184 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™