Mystery surrounds new special grand jury in DC


Full story

In a rare move, the Department of Justice is convening a special grand jury in Washington, potentially paving the way for federal prosecutors to investigate major political figures opposed to President Donald Trump.

While it’s uncertain which specific cases it will review, the grand jury is not typical. Its 23 members can concentrate on a single case or a group of related cases and may even produce a public report listing individuals accused of misconduct, regardless of whether they are charged.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

One of U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s top allies in her office, Steven Vandervelden, will oversee the grand jury, according to The Washington Post, which first reported the panel’s existence.

Vandervelden has worked on major investigations that have been widely viewed as politically motivated, including the probe into former Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and whether D.C. police deliberately manipulated crime stats.

What led to this?

This development follows Trump’s public criticism of Pirro after her office dropped charges against Olympian David Hearn claiming he had vandalized the Reflecting Pool on the National Mall. Trump said Pirro “choked” and “folded like an umbrella” in closing the cases against Hearn and others, even though evidence showed damage to the Reflecting Pool was caused by poor workmanship rather than vandalism. Regardless, the Post noted that prosecutors had already submitted the paperwork for this grand jury before the case was dropped.

News of the special panel also comes just days after Todd Blanche was sworn in as the new attorney general.

Typically, special grand juries are used to investigate government officials or to probe broad conspiracy cases and organized crime. Those who spoke to The Post noted that this instance is notable, given Trump’s interest in prosecuting his adversaries.

Such special grand juries, however, are very rare. Legal experts have stated that there is no recent example of a similar grand jury being convened in Washington.

Joyce Vance, a former federal prosecutor and a law professor in Alabama, wrote on Substack that the formation of the special grand jury echoes Trump’s attempt in his first term to have the Justice Department investigate alleged fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

“Because this is Trump,” Vance wrote, “we should always assume the rules … may not be applied. But here, absent legitimate grounds for reporting and action, it’s difficult to envision how a special grand jury could become a mechanism for executing Trump’s revenge agenda, although even falling under investigation can cause serious reputational damage and financial harm to those who find themselves under scrutiny.”

Round out your reading

Tags: , , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A rarely used federal grand jury has been convened in Washington with the power to investigate major cases and publicly name individuals accused of misconduct, even without charging them.

Public naming without charges

The grand jury can issue a public report identifying people accused of misconduct regardless of whether they face criminal charges, a power legal experts say has no recent precedent in Washington.

Scope remains unconfirmed

Which cases the grand jury will review has not been disclosed, leaving the range of potential subjects and investigations uncertain, according to reporting by The Washington Post.

Political context is contested

Those who spoke to The Post noted the grand jury's formation is notable given Trump's stated interest in prosecuting adversaries, though prosecutors submitted paperwork before a high-profile case dismissal that drew Trump's criticism.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Pirro’s special grand jury as a “desperate,” “weird,” or potentially “sinister” response to Trump’s pressure, even suggesting prosecutorial misuse and portraying her actions as defiance.
  • Media outlets in the center present an “unusual” development that “raises eyebrows,” stressing that the jury’s purpose remains undisclosed and that it could issue a report without producing charges.
  • Media outlets on the right instead call it a “bold move,” emphasizing her independence amid a “clash with Trump,” while de-emphasizing procedural details.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

25 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro has convened a special grand jury in Washington, D.C., a rare move especially for such a small jurisdiction.
  • This special grand jury is expected to investigate politically charged cases and has powers beyond regular grand juries, including issuing reports without indictments.
  • Pirro has faced several prosecutorial setbacks and public criticism during her tenure.
  • Steven Vandervelden, an experienced federal prosecutor, has been appointed to lead the special grand jury.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Thursday, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro convened a 23-member special grand jury in Washington, D.C., a rare legal body focusing on specific investigations over an 18-month term, extendable to 36 months.
  • President Donald Trump pressured Pirro to deliver prosecutions after she dismissed charges against former Olympian David Hearn in the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case, telling reporters last week he had not determined if Pirro would keep her job.
  • Unlike standard panels, this special grand jury can issue reports based on a "preponderance of evidence" of wrongdoing, even without indictments; prosecutors must demonstrate "probable cause" to a simple majority of the 23 members to secure formal charges.
  • Prosecutor Steven Vandervelden supervises the panel after previously investigating former Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Metropolitan Police Department crime statistics allegations, signaling the office intends this body for complex, high-stakes inquiries.
  • Paperwork for the grand jury was submitted before Pirro dismissed the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case, providing prosecutors an alternative avenue to pursue investigations beyond standard criminal charges.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

  • No coverage from Other sources 0 sources

Powered by Ground News™