Abbott threatens Texas city’s funding over local resolution on Gaza


Summary

Funding at risk

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott threatens to cut state funding from San Marcos if the city council approves a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and an arms embargo against Israel.

No mention of Hamas

Abbott criticizes the resolution for not condemning Hamas as the terrorist organization is not mentioned in the resolution.

Resolution defended

San Marcos City Council member Alyssa Garza defends the resolution, stating it is a response to the failure of big governments to address the Gaza conflict and that local governments must act.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Funding at risk

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott threatens to cut state funding from San Marcos if the city council approves a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and an arms embargo against Israel.

No mention of Hamas

Abbott criticizes the resolution for not condemning Hamas as the terrorist organization is not mentioned in the resolution.

Resolution defended

San Marcos City Council member Alyssa Garza defends the resolution, stating it is a response to the failure of big governments to address the Gaza conflict and that local governments must act.


Full story

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, R, has warned that he will cut state funding from the city of San Marcos if the City Council passes a resolution calling for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and an arms embargo against Israel. The resolution, which is set for a vote on May 6, has sparked significant controversy, with Abbott condemning it as “anti-Israel” and “anti-Texas,” while supporters say it’s a way to challenge big government over an international issue.

Governor’s letter to San Marcos mayor

In an April 29, 2025, letter to San Marcos Mayor Jane Hughson, Abbott expressed strong disapproval of the resolution, which advocates for a ceasefire in Gaza and recognition of Palestinian sovereignty. He specifically highlighted the failure of the council to condemn Hamas for the Oct. 7 massacre that triggered the war. Abbott noted that the resolution did not mention the actions of Hamas, which he described as a critical issue when considering the broader Middle East conflict.

“Israel is a stalwart ally of the United States and a friend to Texas,” Abbott wrote in his letter. “I have repeatedly made clear that Texas will not tolerate antisemitism. Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies.” His letter underscores the deep political divide over U.S. foreign policy toward Israel and the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestinian factions in Gaza.

Abbott’s letter stated that his administration had consistently taken steps to oppose the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which targets Israel economically. This includes signing a law banning Texas government entities from supporting BDS and requiring contractors to certify that they do not participate in boycotts against Israel. The law also states that any government entity that violates these provisions risks losing state funding.

Abbott posted on X, “Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies.”

The Texas law that could allow city funding to be stripped

The Texas law, specifically Texas Code § 2271.002, mandates that any state government entity entering into a contract worth $100,000 or more must certify that they do not engage in a boycott of Israel. Failure to comply with the law could result in the termination of state funding. In his letter, Abbott said his office was reviewing active grants to San Marcos to ensure compliance. If the city council moves forward with the resolution, Abbott warned that his office would not enter into future grant agreements with the city and would also terminate any active grants.

Council members defend resolution

San Marcos City Council Member Alyssa Garza, who introduced the resolution, said the city of San Marcos could not rely on the state or federal government “to stop a genocide.” At an April 15 City Council meeting, Garza spoke about the resolution. She framed it as a response to what she described as the failure of larger governments to address the situation in Gaza.

“[It’s] clear to me that when they fund bombs, but cut aid for housing and education and so on here, that’s connected. When they silence protests here and crush dissent abroad, that’s connected. When they defund local governments and nonprofits and they call us ‘distractive’ for standing up, that’s absolutely connected,” Garza said.

The resolution from the city reads in part that it will, “support an end to U.S. military funding and sales to the State of Israel, and an end to federal and local tax dollars contributing to the humanitarian catastrophe and genocide in Palestine.”

The resolution also identifies money from San Marcos that went toward Israel according to the United States Campaign for Palestinian Rights. The resolution states, “In 2024 alone, the U.S. sent Israel $18 billion to bankroll 70% of the ongoing genocide. According to the United States Campaign for Palestinian Rights, $1,405,468,510 from Texans’ tax dollars went to Israel’s purchase of weapons. $4,434,675 of this came from San Marcos residents’ taxes.”

Financial implications for San Marcos

As the City Council prepares for the May 6 vote, the dispute over the resolution is likely to continue to provoke strong reactions from both local and state officials. If the resolution passes, San Marcos could face the loss of millions of dollars in state funding, potentially affecting future projects and initiatives.

“If the City Council adopts this Resolution, the Office of the Governor will not enter into any future grant agreements with the City and will act swiftly to terminate active grants for non-compliance. I will further direct all other state agencies to review agreements with the City for possible breach,” Abbott said.

Mathew Grisham (Digital Producer) and Harry Fogle (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The conflict between Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and the San Marcos City Council highlights the tension between state laws on Israel boycotts and local government autonomy, raising questions about free speech and state funding implications.

State vs. local authority

The clash between Gov. Abbott and the San Marcos City Council underscores the tension between state-level policy enforcement and local governments seeking autonomy to take positions on international matters.

Free speech and boycotts

The potential withdrawal of state funding from San Marcos illustrates the financial risks local governments face when they oppose state laws and other mandates, which could affect local projects and services.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 21 media outlets

Context corner

Texas law prohibits government entities from boycotting Israel, rooted in a national trend of opposition to boycott, divestment and sanction legislation. These laws intend to curb financial movements against Israel, aligning with broader U.S. foreign policy that views Israel as a key ally.

Policy impact

If the city passes the resolution, San Marcos could lose state grant funding, impacting local programs reliant on state resources. This highlights national political tensions between state and local officials.

Quote bank

Gov. Abbott: “Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies.” San Marcos Councilmember Amanda Rodriguez: “This isn’t a political issue; this is a moral litmus test.”

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed Gov. Abbott's actions as a "threat" against San Marcos for "criticizing" Israel, emphasizing the city's intention to redirect funds to "local priorities" after $4.4 million in taxes went to Israel.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right used stronger language like "slams" to describe Abbott's response to the "antisemitic" resolution, highlighting its failure to condemn Hamas and citing his vow to withhold funds.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

21 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Texas Gov. Greg Abbott accused the San Marcos City Council of antisemitism for proposing to reduce funding of over $4 million to Israel, claiming it violates state law prohibiting boycotts against Israel.
  • Abbott threatened to terminate active grants and prevent future agreements if San Marcos passes the resolution, stating that compliance with state law is mandatory.
  • The San Marcos City Council considered reallocation of $4.4 million in funds for local problems, which Abbott claims supports anti-Israel policies that he labels as anti-Texas policies.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Texas Gov. Greg Abbott warned that he would withdraw state financial support from San Marcos if its City Council approves a resolution advocating for a ceasefire in the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict.
  • Abbott cited a Texas law enacted in 2017 that forbids governmental entities from contracting with entities that boycott Israel, requiring written verification against such boycotts for contracts above $100,000.
  • In his April 29 letter to Mayor Jane Hughson, Abbott wrote the resolution appears "calculated" to violate state law and stated, "Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies."
  • Abbott’s office will review and potentially terminate grants to San Marcos for non-compliance, signaling financial penalties if the council proceeds with the resolution as planned for May 6.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Gov. Greg Abbott condemned San Marcos' proposed resolution as antisemitic and threatened to cut state grants if it passes, stating that Texas will not tolerate antisemitism.
  • The San Marcos City Council is set to vote on a resolution advocating for a ceasefire in Palestine and an arms embargo against Israel on May 6, 2025.
  • Abbott's letter emphasizes that the city must comply with state law prohibiting support for boycotts of Israel when entering grant agreements.
  • Many San Marcos residents supported the resolution, claiming it addressed local tax dollars and foreign war involvement, while Abbott expressed it did not condemn Hamas' acts.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™