America Bikes Act gains traction, but critics pump the brakes


This recording was made using enhanced software.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers is pushing new legislation aimed at expanding bicycle access, improving safety and reviving domestic manufacturing. However, critics question whether key parts of the proposal are economically realistic.

Reps. Mike Thompson, D-Calif., and Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., co-chairs of the Congressional Bike Caucus, introduced the “America Bikes Act,” a measure that would increase federal support for bicycle infrastructure, promote cycling education and create incentives to bring bike manufacturing back to the United States.

Supporters say the bill responds to growing demand as more Americans turn to cycling for transportation and recreation. Thompson, an avid cyclist, framed the legislation as a long-term investment in both infrastructure and industry.

“The bottom line is, we would like to encourage and incentivize the production of bicycles … in the United States, but you just can’t flip a switch,” Thompson said in an interview with Straight Arrow.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

The legislation calls for expanding federal funding to help local governments build safer roads and trails, creating programs that connect bicycles with public transit and promoting youth cycling education. Lawmakers say safety improvements are central as bicycle commuting has grown significantly in recent decades.

“We know that … bicycle commuting has grown some 60% nationwide,” Thompson said. “Americans say they want to ride more … but they feel the roads aren’t safe enough to do it.”

The bill’s supporters argue that investing in safer routes for cyclists and pedestrians could reduce traffic congestion, improve public health and cut emissions. Thompson said building out bicycle infrastructure would also respond to increasing demand.

“We should be doing everything we can to make sure we provide safer routes for everyone,” he said.

A key component of the proposal focuses on rebuilding U.S.-based bicycle manufacturing, an effort lawmakers say would help stabilize supply chains after pandemic-era disruptions. Thompson pointed to challenges faced by manufacturers when overseas production slowed or shifted.

“Anything we can do to make for a more stable supply chain … the better off we’ll be,” he said.

Still, critics question whether the economic realities of the industry support that goal. Stewart Munson, a Missouri bicycle retailer, told Straight Arrow domestic manufacturing is “simply not economically viable” under current conditions and warned that making it competitive could require substantial taxpayer subsidies.

Skepticism also surrounds programs intended to increase bike ownership. Munson pointed to mixed results from subsidy initiatives, including e-bike incentives, saying some past efforts have created complications for retailers.

The bill’s emphasis on safety has drawn broader agreement, though some note that road conflicts between cyclists and drivers are complex. Munson said responsibility lies on both sides, citing distracted driving and cyclists ignoring traffic rules as contributing factors.

Lawmakers and advocates also highlight potential economic benefits. Thompson pointed to trail development projects that have generated millions in local revenue, arguing that safe cycling infrastructure can boost tourism and small businesses.

Still, critics question whether the United States can match the extensive bike networks seen in parts of Europe. While acknowledging progress in some regions, Munson said replicating those systems nationwide would be difficult.

Thompson, however, expressed optimism that continued investment could build momentum over time.

“You can’t have 50% of Americans saying they want to ride a bike more … without seeing that trickle into the political space,” he said. “It’s the build it and they will come.”


Round out your reading

Tags: ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A bipartisan bill proposes expanding federal funding for bicycle infrastructure, safety programs and domestic manufacturing incentives, with critics contesting whether parts of the proposal are economically workable.

Road safety funding proposed

The bill would direct federal money to local governments to build safer roads and trails, responding to what lawmakers describe as a 60% growth in bicycle commuting nationwide.

Manufacturing incentives contested

A Missouri retailer told Straight Arrow that domestic bike manufacturing is "simply not economically viable" and warned competitive production could require substantial taxpayer subsidies.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Sources

  1. American Bikes Act
  2. Rep. Mike Thompson, D-Calif.
  3. Stewart Munson, Bike retailer

Sources

  1. American Bikes Act
  2. Rep. Mike Thompson, D-Calif.
  3. Stewart Munson, Bike retailer