Amid demolition backlash, White House says it will seek approval for ballroom


Summary

Announcement

The White House says it intends to go through the proper channels and submit plans for a new ballroom soon.

Concerns

The move comes after critics raised concerns over the White House’s lack of transparency during demolition of the East Wing.

Response

The Trump administration has dismissed concerns and contended that past presidents have renovated the White House as needed.


Full story

A day after beginning demolition on the East Wing of the White House, the Trump administration announced Tuesday it will submit blueprints for President Donald Trump’s $250 million White House ballroom to the agency that oversees federal building construction in Washington. The announcement followed criticism by Democrats and historians who argued a review process should have been conducted before the project began.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The White House said it will eventually send its plans for the ballroom to the National Capital Planning Commission, which oversees construction in the District of Columbia and nearby states, according to a statement from a Trump administration official to Reuters.

“Construction plans have not yet been submitted to the National Capital but will be soon,” the White House official said, adding that the commission has no authority over demolition work.

Concerns among preservationists and Democrats

The National Trust for Historic Preservation requested that the White House halt the demolition until the commission can conduct an assessment. In a letter to the Trump administration, the organization noted concerns that the planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom would “overwhelm the White House itself.” The White House currently covers about 55,000 square feet over six floors.

Pictures of demolition crews dismantling parts of the East Wing — first published by The Washington Post on Monday — raised concerns among preservationists and sparked anger among Democrats, who claimed the effort is an overreach by the Trump administration and lacks transparency.

According to the Post, the Treasury Department ordered staff not to share pictures of the demolition without permission. Some of the department’s offices sit in view of the East Wing.

Trump administration’s response

The Trump administration dismissed concerns as “manufactured outrage” and contended that past presidents had modified the White House as needed.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

The White House, which opened in 1800, has 132 rooms and 35 bathrooms, and the last major renovation of the structure was between 1948 and 1952.

The bulk of the East Wing was added to the building in 1942 under President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Roosevelt also added an indoor pool. A bowling alley and a balcony were constructed as part of a 1952 remodeling overseen by President Harry Truman, and President Barack Obama added an outdoor basketball court in 2009. No other project has transformed the structure to the extent of Trump’s ballroom, however.

A White House source told the Post that certain historic artifacts are being preserved during the demolition.

Demolition company flooded with negative reviews and comments

As the demolition continues, the company in charge of the project, ACECO of Silver Spring, Maryland, has been flooded with negative online reviews and social media posts, according to The Baltimore Banner.

Online critics are urging others to do the same, as some accuse Trump of using the project to further his personal desires.

The White House says the project is privately funded, but it has not released a full list of donors.

Mathew Grisham (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The proposed demolition and major addition to the White House under President Trump has sparked debates over historic preservation, government transparency and the role of private funding in significant government projects.

Historic preservation

Concerns from historians and preservationists highlight fears of irreversible changes to an iconic national site, raising questions about how much the White House's historic character should be altered.

Government transparency

The demolition has prompted claims of inadequate review and a lack of openness, with critics arguing the project began before appropriate oversight and public notification.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.