Appeals court rules against Trump in Kilmar Abrego Garcia case


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • An appellate court panel unanimously ruled against the Trump administration’s request to reverse an order that they facilitate the return of Kilamar Abrego Garcia. Authorities mistakenly deported the Maryland man to his native El Salvador.
  • The Justice Department initially called the man’s deportation an error, but it later released information tying him to the MS-13 gang. 
  • The judges said Abrego Garcia was still owed due process even if he were affiliated with the gang.

Full Story

A federal appellate court unanimously rejected Thursday evening the Trump administration’s request to reverse an order saying they must bring back Kilmar Abrego Garcia on Thursday evening, April 17. The government previously admitted it wrongly deported Abrego Garcia to a prison in El Salvador.

The three-judge panel for the 4th Circuit called the federal government’s request “extraordinary and premature” in its denial. 

“It is difficult in some cases to get to the very heart of the matter. But in this case, it is not hard at all,” U.S. Circuit Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III said. “The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The legal battle between Abrego Garcia’s family and the federal government goes on as he resides in El Salvador’s maximum security CECOT prison. 

What’s are the allegations against Abrego Garcia?

After the Justice Department initially stated that Abrego Garcia’s deportation was in error, it released information tying him to MS-13, an international crime gang that President Donald Trump designated a foreign terrorist organization. Maryland police officers identified Abrego Garcia as a member of the MS-13 gang after a 2019 arrest, noting gang-symbolic clothing and a source identifying him as an active member.

This gang affiliation is the basis for Trump’s argument that his administration should be able to deport him without due process. 

The judges acknowledged these allegations but echoed the initial circuit court ruling by saying that Abrego Garcia wasn’t given his due process rights. 

“The government asserts that Abrego Garcia is a terrorist and a member of MS-13. Perhaps, but perhaps not. Regardless, he is still entitled to due process,” the ruling stated.

What have officials previously said about returning Abrego Garcia?

Trump said the earlier court ruling ordering Abrego Garcia’s return couldn’t be facilitated because he was on a plane over international waters en route to El Salvador at the time. In a meeting with Trump in the Oval Office, Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele said he couldn’t return the Maryland man. 

U.S. Attorney Pam Bondi said returning Abrego Garcia was now a decision for El Salvador to make, calling it a “foreign affairs” matter.

FCC chair on Abrego Garcia media coverage

Trump criticized media outlets’ coverage of Abrego Garcia’s deportation. On Wednesday, April 16, Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr claimed Comcast-owned news stations, including NBC and MSNBC, misled the American public about Abrego Garcia. He said the outlets covered the man’s deportation closely until information came out showing he might have been less than a model citizen.

“Comcast outlets spent days misleading the American public — implying that Abrego Garcia was merely a law-abiding U.S. citizen, just a regular ‘Maryland man,’” Carr wrote on X. “When the truth comes out, they ignore it.”

Tags: , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the court's ruling as a condemnation of the Trump administration's "shocking" "defiance" and warned of "lawlessness," emphasizing the potential for an "incipient crisis" between branches.
  • Media outlets in the center acknowledge the "blunt criticism" from the administration but focus on the legal process and the possibility of Supreme Court involvement, a topic de-emphasized by the right.
  • Media outlets on the right acknowledge the court's ruling but de-emphasize the left's characterizations and instead highlight Abrego Garcia's detention in a "terrorist prison" and described him as an "alleged MS-13 member," framing the situation through a lens of border security concerns.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

100 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously refused to suspend a judge's order for testimony from Trump administration officials regarding Abrego Garcia's return.
  • The panel criticized the Trump administration for claiming a right to keep residents in foreign prisons without due process.
  • The opinion noted that the judiciary is damaged by perceptions of illegitimacy, while the executive is affected by views of lawlessness.
  • The panel indicated that this case could lead to a crisis but also presents an opportunity for mutual respect.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A federal appeals court ruled against the Trump administration on Thursday regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
  • The ruling stemmed from Garcia's deportation to El Salvador despite a court order blocking it.
  • The Justice Department appealed Judge Paula Xinis' order for officials to testify regarding compliance with facilitating Garcia's return.
  • The court found the administration claimed it was powerless to free Garcia, which they deemed "shocking."
  • The panel asserted the executive branch risks appearing lawless and clashes with the judiciary.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously declined to suspend a ruling requiring testimony from Trump administration officials about facilitating Abrego Garcia's return from an El Salvador prison.
  • Judge Paula Xinis ordered sworn testimony from officials in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department.
  • The appeals court criticized the Trump administration's claim that it cannot assist in Garcia's return, stating it is shocking and undermines due process.
  • The panel noted that the conflict between the executive and judicial branches can harm both, affecting public perception and legitimacy of the government.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™