Appeals court rules Trump administration can’t withhold $4 billion in SNAP funding


Summary

SNAP funding

A federal appeals court says the Trump administration must full fund SNAP for November.

Back and forth

A Rhode Island court ruled the program must be fully funded, but Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson put a temporary hold on that until the appeals court could decide.

USDA wants money back

The appeals court's ruling came after the USDA ordered states to "immediately" undo steps taken to fund the program. It is unclear if that order will remain effective.


Full story

A federal appeals court has ruled the Trump administration must fully fund food assistance benefits during the ongoing government shutdown.

Late Sunday night, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston upheld a lower court order from Rhode Island requiring the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to release $4 billion to ensure Americans receive full Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The decision came after the USDA told states to “immediately undo” any steps taken to distribute full benefits, commonly known as food stamps, warning of possible financial penalties.

Several states began issuing payments Friday. However, on Saturday, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson temporarily paused the order while the appeals court reviewed the case.

Even with Sunday’s ruling, that pause stays in place for 48 hours, meaning payments won’t resume right away.

It’s still unclear whether the administration plans to follow through on its threat to penalize states it says acted without authorization.

Devan Markham (Morning Digital Producer) and Jason K. Morrell (Morning Managing Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal appeals court ruling on SNAP funding during a government shutdown highlights ongoing legal and administrative disputes over access to essential food assistance for millions of Americans.

SNAP benefits funding

The appeals court's directive regarding the release of funds for SNAP affects the availability of food assistance to those who rely on the program during the government shutdown.

Legal intervention

Court involvement demonstrates the judiciary's role in determining the provision of federal resources during administrative disputes between state and federal agencies.

Government shutdown effects

The ongoing shutdown raises issues about the continuity of government services and the impact on vulnerable populations dependent on federally administered programs.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.