Arizona Gov. Hobbs vetoes bill banning China from owning land in state


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

The veto

Arizona Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed legislation that would have banned the Chinese government from owning land in the state.

Hobbs' reasoning

Hobbs said the bill would have been “ineffective” as a counterespionage tool and that it did not contain a clear procedure for implementation.

Criticism

Critics accuse the governor of failing to protect sensitive military sites and opening the door to Chinese espionage.


Full story

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed a bill that would have banned the Chinese government from owning a stake of 30% or more of any property in the state. Hobbs, a Democrat, disagreed with Republican lawmakers over whether the measure would prevent Chinese espionage.

The “legislation is ineffective at counterespionage and does not directly protect our military assets,” Hobbs wrote in a veto message on Monday, June 2. She argued that the bill “lacks clear implementation criteria and opens the door to arbitrary enforcement.”

It would take a two-thirds vote by both chambers of the state Legislature to override Hobbs’ veto.

National security concerns

The legislation, known as Senate Bill 1109, was sponsored by GOP Sen. Janae Shamp. She argued the measure was needed to protect military facilities in Arizona from spying efforts by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Military installations in Arizona include Luke Air Force Base, located outside Mesa, and the Marine Corps Air Station in Yuma.

Shamp accused Beijing of already committing espionage near the Air Force base.

“The actual Chinese government, our enemy, was trying to lease buildings near the (Luke Air Force) base,” Shamp said. “Not making sure we are protecting our national security or our men and women on the ground here in Arizona is ludicrous to me.” 

Shamp previously said the “protection of this state’s military, commercial and agricultural assets from foreign espionage and sabotage will place this state in a significantly stronger position to withstand national security threats.”

Chinese investors have purchased land near military bases in other areas, raising national security concerns. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2023 that the U.S. tracked roughly 100 cases involving Chinese nationals, sometimes posing as tourists, who tried to enter American military bases or installations. 

Concerns over proposal

State Democratic lawmakers argued the original version of Shamp’s bill was unconstitutional and discriminatory, the Arizona Mirror wrote.

In its first draft, the bill banned land ownership in Arizona by people and companies from any nation listed as an enemy of the United States, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. However, the proposal exempted small residential tracts more than 50 miles from a U.S. military facility. It was similar to an even more restrictive piece of legislation in Texas, as Straight Arrow News reported in May.

The heavily amended version of Shamp’s bill, which passed the House on May 6, alleviated some concerns by banning property ownership by the Chinese government or entities controlled by the CCP. Eight Democrats supported the bill in the House, but the Senate’s final approval came on a party-line vote.

Backlash to Hobbs’ veto

Shamp called Hobbs’ veto “politically motivated” and “utterly insane.” She accused the governor of obstructionism “against safeguarding our citizens from threats,” Fox News reported.

Hobbs also drew criticism from State Armor Action, a nonprofit organization that is pushing 70 bills targeting China in states across the country, according to The Wall Street Journal. The organization declines to identify its funding sources.

“Gov. Hobbs’s veto of SB 1109 hangs an ‘Open for the CCP’ sign on Arizona’s front door, allowing Communist China to buy up land near critical assets like Luke Air Force Base, Palo Verde nuclear power plant and Taiwan Semiconductor’s growing fabrication footprint,” Michael Lucci, the CEO and founder of State Armor Action, told Fox News.

“Allowing Communist China to buy up land near our critical assets is a national security risk, plain and simple,” Lucci said, adding that “Gov. Hobbs is substantively and completely wrong when she says that SB 1109 ‘is ineffective at counter-espionage and does not directly protect our military assets.’”

Cassandra Buchman (Digital Producer ), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor), and Alan Judd (Content Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The debate over Arizona's vetoed legislation concerning Chinese government property ownership highlights ongoing national security concerns, state-level policy responses and broader tensions regarding foreign investment in the United States.

National security

Concerns about potential Chinese espionage and proximity to U.S. military sites drive discussions on restricting foreign land ownership.

State legislative action

The Arizona state government's process of passing, amending and ultimately vetoing legislation reflects how individual states are addressing or contesting foreign investment issues amid partisan disagreements.

Scrutiny over foreign investments

The proposed restrictions and related national debates illustrate increased scrutiny and controversy over Chinese entities purchasing land near sensitive U.S. infrastructure.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 22 media outlets

Context corner

Concerns over foreign ownership of U.S. land, particularly by Chinese entities, have led to proposed or enacted laws in at least 22 states besides Arizona. These legislative efforts often arise after reports of attempted land purchases near sensitive U.S. military installations, reflecting broader U.S.-China geopolitical tensions and growing scrutiny of foreign investment in critical infrastructure.

Debunking

Some reports alleging Chinese land acquisition efforts near U.S. military bases, such as those referenced by supporters of the Arizona bill, have been contested or described as misleading. For example, according to AZ Mirror, Democrats and critics have noted that not all reported incidents of Chinese purchases near bases accurately reflect actual threats or successful transactions.

Oppo research

Opponents of SB 1109, including most of Arizona's Democratic lawmakers, argue the bill risks discrimination based on national origin and could violate constitutional property rights. Concerns are also raised about redundancy, given existing federal mechanisms that already scrutinize and restrict foreign investments near sensitive U.S. locations.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the veto as a cautious stance against potentially discriminatory legislation, emphasizing concerns about exclusionary impacts on Chinese nationals and questioning the bill’s effectiveness and fairness, often employing terms like “cutting off” that suggest unnecessary or xenophobic restrictions.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right deploy sharply partisan and emotive language such as “total disgrace,” “ripped,” and references to the “CCP” "buying up" land, casting the veto as a reckless endangerment of national security and a capitulation to communist influence.
  • Media outlets in the center present the facts with neutral, procedural language, emphasizing legal challenges and existing federal oversight.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

22 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On June 2, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed Senate Bill 1109, legislation that sought to prevent the Chinese government and its affiliated entities from purchasing land within the state.
  • Republicans backed the bill due to concerns about Chinese entities attempting to lease property near military bases like Luke Air Force Base.
  • The legislation was approved by the House with a 41-17 vote that included bipartisan backing and passed the Senate along party lines following a May amendment that limited its focus specifically to interests tied to the Chinese government.
  • Hobbs argued the bill lacked enforceable guidelines and could lead to arbitrary enforcement, while Senate Majority Leader Janae Shamp called it a "commonsense measure to ensure enemies would not have easy access" to military bases.
  • The veto means Arizona will continue to depend on federal oversight through a Treasury Department body responsible for reviewing foreign investments, which has the authority to prevent property acquisitions near critical military installations, reflecting that national security concerns are still addressed at the federal level.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed SB 1109, which aimed to restrict Chinese ownership of land near military bases, citing concerns over its effectiveness and clarity.
  • State Seb. Janae Shamp criticized Hobbs, accusing her of obstructing national security measures and citing recent attempts by Chinese entities to lease property near military sites.
  • Despite the veto, the Arizona legislature may attempt to override it, and 27 other states are considering similar restrictions on foreign land ownership.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.