Babylon Bee gets California law banning political deepfakes struck down


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Blocked

A federal judge blocked a California law banning political deepfakes, ruling it violated the First Amendment.

Challenged

The law was challenged by The Babylon Bee and others, who argued it censored protected speech.

Overly broad

The judge said the law was overly broad and could have targeted only harmful or false content.


Full story

A federal judge has blocked a California law banning political deepfakes after critics said it restricted free speech. The judge made this decision after The Babylon Bee, a conservative Christian satire website, and others filed a lawsuit arguing that the law violated free speech rights.

In September 2024, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two bills into law: Assembly Bill 2839 and Assembly Bill 2655. Both laws aimed to restrict the creation and use of deepfake content featuring political figures, especially during election periods, to prevent misinformation.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Judge sides with satire site in First Amendment case

U.S. District Judge John Mendez sided with The Babylon Bee and decided that the California laws violate the First Amendment.

Mendez ruled that California’s AB 2839 unlawfully censors speech before any actual harm occurs, lacks precedent under the First Amendment, and could have been narrowly tailored to target only false speech causing real, legal harm.

“To be sure, deepfakes and artificially manipulated media arguably pose significant risks to electoral integrity,” Mendez wrote, “but the challenges launched by digital content on a global scale cannot be quashed through censorship or legislative fiat.”

The decision goes on to say, “Rather than targeting content that procures tangible harms or materially benefits a speaker, AB 2839 attempts to stifle speech before it occurs or actually harms anyone as long as it is ‘reasonably likely’ to do so and it allows almost anyone to act as a censorship czar.”

The Babylon Bee and the other plaintiffs in the case were represented by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a conservative legal organization.

“Our job is hard enough when our jokes keep coming true, as if they were prophecies,” The Babylon Bee’s CEO Seth Dillon said in a statement. “But it becomes significantly more difficult when self-serving politicians abuse their power to try to control public discourse and clamp down on comedy. We’re pleased the court recognized the First Amendment secures our right to tell jokes, even ones the government doesn’t like.”

In July 2024, after Newsom saw a parody video of Vice President Kamala Harris and said it “should be illegal,” the California Legislature quickly passed two bills aimed at restricting such content. Newsom signed those bills into law on Sept. 17, 2024.

Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal judge's decision to block California's law targeting political deepfakes highlights ongoing tensions between combating misinformation and protecting free speech rights, especially during election cycles.

First Amendment rights

The court's ruling emphasizes the protection of free speech, finding that California's attempt to restrict deepfakes unlawfully censors speech before any harm is proven.

Election misinformation

The case centers on concerns about the potential impact of deepfakes on electoral integrity, raising questions about how to address misinformation while balancing constitutional freedoms.

Legislative responses to technology

California's legislative effort to curb deepfake content illustrates broader challenges lawmakers face in regulating new technologies without infringing on constitutional rights.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.