‘Barely legal type’: Megyn Kelly faces backlash following Epstein comments


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Backlash

Conservative podcaster Megyn Kelly is facing backlash following comments she made about Jeffrey Epstein.

The comments

Kelly said she was not making excuses for Epstein, but noted his victims were the “barely legal type,” not 8-year-olds.

Renewed

The comments come amid heightened pressure in Washington to release all the Epstein files.


Full story

Conservative podcaster Megyn Kelly is facing backlash after describing victims of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as “the barely legal type.” Kelly made the comments Wednesday on her SiriusXM talk show.

Kelly’s comments

“I do know somebody very, very close to this case who’s in a position to know virtually everything,” Kelly said. “This person has told me from the start … that Jeffrey Epstein, in this person’s view, was not a pedophile… that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Kelly added: “I realize this is disgusting. I am not trying to make an excuse for this; I’m just providing you with facts. He wasn’t into, like, 8-year-olds, but he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby. That is what I believed.”

She continued by addressing Attorney General Pam Bondi’s announcement earlier this year that the Justice Department was reviewing thousands of videos of alleged child sexual abuse material on Epstein’s computer. 

She said that was the first time she thought Epstein was “an actual pedophile.”

“For the first time, I thought, ‘Oh no, he was an actual pedophile. Only a pedophile gets off on young children abuse video,’” Kelly said. “I have to be honest, I don’t really trust Pam Bondi’s word on the Epstein matters anymore. I don’t know what is true about him. We have yet to see anybody come forward and say, ‘I was under 10, I was under 14 when I first came within his purview.’”

She went on to say there’s a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old — even though neither would be able to legally consent to sexual activity 

Criticisms arise online

Following the episode, Kelly was widely criticized on social media. One user, whose X bio says she is an English teacher turned librarian, wrote, “I teach 15-year-olds. They are literal children.”

Another user wrote, “‘He wasn’t a pedophile, he just liked 15-year-olds’ is not the defense you think it is, Megyn.”

Renewed Epstein discussions

Kelly’s comments come amid heightened pressure in Washington to release all files from the government’s investigation of the late financier’s alleged sex trafficking activities. The House Oversight Committee dropped over 20,000 emails and texts from Epstein this week. In one, Epstein said President Donald Trump “knew about the girls.” In another, he said Trump spent several hours at his home with one of the underage victims.

On Truth Social, Trump called the emails false and the document dump a “hoax.” He wrote that Democrats will “do anything at all to deflect on how badly they’ve done on the shutdown.”

He warned Republicans not to “fall into that trap,” adding, “there should be no deflections to Epstein or anything else, and any Republicans involved should be focused only on opening up our country.”

The Epstein case is not going away, however. The House will soon vote on a measure calling for the full release of files regarding his activities. 

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., was forced to allow the vote after Rep. Adelita Grijalva, D-Ariz., was sworn in on Wednesday. She provided the 218th signature on a bipartisan petition bringing the measure to the House floor. A vote could take place as early as next week.

Johnson confirmed he’ll bring it to the floor earlier than expected. It’s a shift in strategy that sources tell CNN came after GOP leaders realized the vote couldn’t be stopped.

Alan Judd contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Debate over how the media characterizes Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, as highlighted by Megyn Kelly's comments, intersects with renewed scrutiny of political figures and the release of new investigative documents, raising questions about accountability and public understanding of child exploitation.

Media framing of abuse

How public figures and media describe or distinguish sexual abuse of minors influences public perception and broader social understanding of consent, legality and the gravity of exploitation.

Political ramifications

Newly released Epstein-related documents, referenced by both major parties and implicating prominent individuals, show how allegations of abuse continue to affect political discourse and efforts toward transparency.

Accountability and legal definitions

Ongoing debate about legal and diagnostic terms like "pedophile" versus age of victims highlights challenges in holding perpetrators accountable and underscores the importance of precise language in laws and investigations.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 21 media outlets

Community reaction

There was intense backlash across social media and from advocacy groups, with multiple commentators and everyday users criticizing Megyn Kelly for her remarks and arguing that abuse of minors is unacceptable regardless of the victim's exact age.

Debunking

Medical and psychiatric definitions distinguish between 'pedophilia' (attraction to prepubescent children) and 'hebephilia' or 'ephebophilia' (attraction to pubescent or post-pubescent minors), but legally, sexual acts with anyone under the age of consent are considered child abuse or statutory rape.

History lesson

Past efforts to release Epstein-related documents have been met with political resistance and controversy, tracing back to his 2008 plea deal and subsequent federal investigations prior to his 2019 death.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Megyn Kelly's questioning of Jeffrey Epstein as a "pedophile" as "disgusting" and "downplaying" his crimes, using terms like "MAGA host" and asserting she was "not trying to make an excuse" — before doing exactly that, or "splitting hairs.
  • Media outlets in the center while reporting Kelly "casts doubt" and noting she called Epstein's actions "sick," also use sensational language like "career-ending" to describe the public "firestorm.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets on the right to provide a bias comparison.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

33 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Megyn Kelly stated on her show that a close associate believes Jeffrey Epstein was "not a pedophile" but preferred "barely legal" individuals, particularly 15-year-old girls.
  • Despite Epstein's history of convictions for sexual abuse, Kelly suggested that no victims have claimed they were under 14 when abused by him.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Wednesday, Megyn Kelly, conservative podcaster and former Fox News host, questioned whether Jeffrey Epstein was a pedophile on The Megyn Kelly Show, Sirius XM, citing an unnamed source "very, very close to this case" who said Epstein preferred "barely legal" 15-year-olds.
  • Earlier this year, Pam Bondi's disclosure that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was reviewing "tens of thousands" of Jeffrey Epstein videos prompted Kelly to reconsider his pedophilia claims, amid his prior convictions and accusations in Florida and New York where the age of consent is 18.
  • Medical experts noted the clinical distinction between pedophilia and attraction to pubescent adolescents, with Michael Seto saying, it's ages 13 to 15, while social critics on X called Megyn Kelly's remarks "disgusting" and warned of career-ending backlash.
  • Following the episode, major outlets sought comment and circulation increased as Newsweek reached out to Megyn Kelly's press team Thursday and Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released emails renewing scrutiny of Donald Trump and Epstein.
  • A House vote on releasing the Epstein files is set for next week, with victims recruited to his New York mansion and West Palm Beach estate and coerced by men 4 and 5 times their age.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.