
Biden’s use of autopen and the legality of his pardons: Bias Breakdown
By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter), Ian Kennedy (Video Editor Manager)
- A new political controversy has emerged as President Donald Trump and conservative outlets raise concerns over former President Joe Biden’s use of an autopen to sign official documents and pardons. The Heritage Foundation initiated the controversy by suggesting Biden’s signatures on multiple documents appear identical, raising questions about their authenticity.
- Right-leaning media emphasize concerns over Biden’s mental acuity and potential abuse of power, while left-leaning media downplay the controversy, framing autopen use as legally sound and consistent with historical precedent.
- Legal opinions on whether autopen-signed pardons could be overturned vary, with right-leaning experts suggesting potential legal challenges and left-leaning experts arguing that autopen-signed pardons remain official acts.
Full Story
A new political controversy has emerged, President Donald Trump and conservative outlets raise concerns over former President Joe Biden’s use of an autopen to sign official documents. The allegations, first brought forward by Heritage Foundation, a conservative government watchdog group, question the validity of Biden’s signatures on official documents and pardons. Media coverage has framed the issue in contrasting ways, reflecting partisan perspectives.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- President Donald Trump claimed that former President Joe Biden's pardons are invalid because they were allegedly signed using an autopen, a machine that duplicates signatures, but provides no evidence for this claim.
- The Oversight Project has been a key source of the narrative about Biden's use of an autopen for signing documents, although legal experts disagree on the validity of this claim.
- Legal experts stated that nothing in the Constitution requires a pardon to be hand-signed, and therefore it cannot be rescinded based on the signature method.
- Biden's use of an autopen for signing documents is common among presidents, with past examples including Barack Obama, who used one to sign legislation while abroad.
- Donald Trump is accusing Joe Biden of not physically signing key pardons, claiming they were signed with an autopen, according to analysis from The Heritage Foundation.
- Legal experts affirmed that pardons signed by an autopen are valid under U.S. law, contrary to Trump's claims.
- Professor Erin Delaney stated that Trump's attempt to rescind Biden's pardons would violate constitutional norms.
- Biden issued several pardons on Jan. 19, including those for Hunter Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci, just before Trump took office.
- The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project claimed former President Joe Biden used an autopen to sign pardons.
- President Donald Trump asserted that the pardons are void since Biden did not personally sign them.
- Trump indicated that the legality of the pardons could be challenged in court.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Understanding the autopen
An autopen is a machine that replicates signatures with real ink, enabling public officials, including U.S. presidents, to sign documents remotely. The practice dates back centuries, with Thomas Jefferson using a similar device. More recently:
- In 2005, President George W. Bush’s Office of Legal Counsel affirmed a president could lawfully authorize an autopen signature.
- In 2011, President Barack Obama became the first known president to sign legislation using an autopen while abroad.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Heritage Foundation autopen allegations
🚨 Autopen Update 🚨
— Oversight Project (@OversightPR) March 11, 2025
We analyzed Biden's Jan. 19, 2025 "pardons" for:
-Biden Family Members
-Anthony Fauci
-General Milley
-J6 Committee
-Gerald Lundergan
They all have the same exact Biden autopen signature https://t.co/jc6mkx37il pic.twitter.com/8VeBDwLNv7
The Heritage Foundation initiated the current controversy by releasing videos on X showing Biden’s signatures on multiple documents appearing identical. Their report suggests:
- Biden and his staff may have used an autopen for preemptive pardons, including for family members and Jan. 6 committee members.
- The authenticity of Biden’s involvement and knowledge of these signatures is uncertain.
- “Whoever controlled the autopen controlled the presidency,” the group stated on X.
The group’s findings rely on documents from the Federal Register. However, the National Archives clarified in a statement to Snopes that digital copies of presidential signatures are standardized using a single graphic file for online records. Other media outlets found identical signatures from previous presidents in the same database, further complicating the claims.
Fox News Digital also examined the signatures on President Donald Trump’s executive orders, which are often signed in public or in front of the media, during his first administration and second administration and found the signatures were also the same.
Fox News
Media coverage and diverging narratives
Coverage of the autopen allegations differs significantly across political lines.
Right-Leaning Media:
- The Daily Wire: “Biden Pardons Were Signed With Autopen While He Was On Vacation, Watchdog Finds.”
- The New York Post: “Biden used ‘autopen signature’ on many official WH docs, raising concerns over his awareness.”
- Fox News: “Biden’s ‘autopen signature’ appears on most official docs, raising concerns over who controlled the WH: report.”
These outlets emphasize concerns over Biden’s mental acuity and suggest that someone else may have been making presidential decisions without his knowledge. Fox News also referenced past criticisms of Biden’s cognitive abilities, including statements from House Speaker Mike Johnson expressing concerns over Biden’s awareness of his own executive actions.
Left-Leaning Media:
- NPR: “Trump tries to void Biden’s pardons, blaming autopen. Many presidents have used it.”
- Snopes: “Biden may have signed documents with autopen — like many presidents before him.”
- Associated Press: “Presidents have used autopens for decades. Now Trump objects to Biden’s use of one.”
These outlets downplay the controversy, framing autopen use as legally sound. NPR’s coverage notes that Trump’s objections lack supporting evidence and that previous presidents have utilized the autopen.
Legal debate over pardons
Experts consulted by different media outlets provide conflicting opinions on whether Biden’s pardons could be invalidated.
- Right-leaning experts: Suggest that Biden’s preemptive pardons may be legally challenged due to the lack of specified crimes.
“It’s certainly a clever argument, but I think that some of these pardons were so broad and unprecedented that the only way to determine the legality of them would be to attempt to charge some of those folks and have a court weigh in on that.”
Katie Cherkasky, Constitutional Law Attorney on Fox News
- Left-leaning experts: Argue that autopen-signed pardons remain official acts and that courts have upheld broad presidential pardon authority.
“We’ve had autopen for decades, no presidential action has ever been invalidated or undone because it was signed by autopen. While the pardon power itself is extremely broad, there is no such thing as an un-pardon power.”
Elie Honig, Former Federal Prosecutor on CNN
President Trump’s response
President Trump has criticized Biden’s autopen usage, posting on Truth Social that any pardons signed this way are “void, vacant, and of no further force or effect.”
Trump questioned whether Biden was aware of the process, implying that an unauthorized individual could have been controlling the White House.
“It looked like we had an autopen for a president. The whole subject of autopen, did he know what he was doing? Did he authorize it or did somebody maybe a radical left lunatic just sign what that person wants.”
President Trump
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to the press’ questions over Trump’s claims, saying he was “begging the question” whether the pardons should be void. Trump said Sunday night on Air Force One that courts should decide the legality of Biden’s autopen signatures.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Conclusion
While it remains unclear how frequently the Biden administration used the autopen, the controversy highlights how media outlets shape public perception. The right frames it as a potential abuse of power and a sign of Biden’s diminished capacity, while the left presents it as a non-issue consistent with historical precedent.
Legal opinions on whether autopen-signed pardons could be overturned vary, leaving the matter open for debate. For now, Biden officials have not provided a direct response to media inquiries regarding his use of autopen, and any legal challenge would ultimately be decided by the courts. The public discourse surrounding the issue continues to be driven by speculation over what will happen next.
To see more Bias Breakdown, click here.
WELCOME TO BIAS BREAKDOWN.
I’M YOUR HOST KARAH RUCKER.
ANOTHER WEEK –
ANOTHER CONTROVERSY.
IN THE SPOTLIGHT – PRESIDENT TRUMP IS QUESTIONING FORMER PRESIDENT BIDEN’S USE OF WHAT’S CALLED “AN AUTOPEN SIGNATURE.”
A CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT WATCHDOG GROUP WAS FIRST TO BRING FORTH ALLEGATIONS OF BIDEN USING AN AUTO-SIGNATURE TO SIGN OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS –
ALLEGING SOMEONE ELSE COULD HAVE BEEN PUTTING THE INK TO PAPER –
AND POSING THE QUESTION – WAS IT BIDEN WHO PARDONED A SLEW OF PEOPLE BEFORE HEADING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE – OR – WAS IT SOMEONE ELSE USING BIDEN’S SIGNATURE?
AND IF IT WAS SOMEONE ELSE – ARE THE PARDONS VALID?
THESE QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ECHOED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP AND CONSERVATIVES.
AND THE ANSWER – WIDELY DIFFERS AMONG NEWS OUTLETS WITH A LEFT AND RIGHT POLITICAL BIAS.
THAT’S THE FOCUS OF TODAY’S BIAS BREAKDOWN.
SINCE THIS STORY REVOLVES AROUND THE TERM “AUTOPEN” –
LET’S QUICKLY DEFINE IT AND THEN GET INTO WHY IT’S MAKING HEADLINES.
AN AUTOPEN IS A MACHINE THAT REPLICATES SIGNATURES USING REAL INK, ALLOWING PUBLIC FIGURES – LIKE PRESIDENTS – TO SIGN DOCUMENTS IN BULK –
OR SIGN PAPERS WITH THEIR EXACT SIGNATURE WITHOUT THEM HAVING TO BE PRESENT.
It’s not a new concept – with reports dating back to the early 1800’s of Thomas Jefferson using a form of “autopen” – a polygraph – to make copies of his signature.
IN 2005, PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH’S OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL ISSUED A 29 PAGE OPINION CLARIFYING THAT A PRESIDENT COULD LAWFULLY DIRECT A SUBORDINATE TO APPLY A PRESIDENT’S SIGNATURE USING AN AUTOPEN.
BARACK OBAMA BECAME THE FIRST KNOWN PRESIDENT TO SIGN LEGISLATION WITH AN AUTOPEN IN 2011, WHEN HE APPROVED A PATRIOT ACT EXTENSION WHILE IN FRANCE.
HERE’S WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT THE RECENT AUTOPEN CLAIMS SURROUNDING BIDEN.
THIS STORY FIRST GAINED TRACTION THROUGH THE CONSERVATIVE WATCHDOG GROUP “THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION,” WHICH WAS A SOURCE OF CONTROVERSY LAST YEAR WITH ITS “PROJECT 2025” PROPOSAL.
AS PART OF AN “OVERSIGHT PROJECT” – THE GROUP POSTED SEVERAL VIDEOS ON X –
SHOWING BIDEN’S SIGNATURES ON EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS –
ALIGNING PERFECTLY WITH HIS SIGNATURES ON PRESIDENTIAL PRE-EMPTIVE PARDONS – FOR SOME OF HIS FAMILY MEMBERS AND MEMBERS OF THE JANUARY 6TH COMMITTEE –
SUGGESTING BIDEN AND HIS STAFF USED THE AUTOPEN.
IN A POST ON X THE GROUP SAYS –
“WHOEVER CONTROLLED THE AUTOPEN CONTROLLED THE PRESIDENCY.”
IN A 29 PAGE DOCUMENT DETAILING ITS INVESTIGATION SO FAR –
THE FOUNDATION WROTE
“We are reviewing additional official documents containing President Biden’s signature. We reviewed Executive Orders and other documents in the Federal Register bearing President Biden’s signature. We found the signatures on those records were identical and appear to be digital signatures of an autopenned signature.”
HERITAGE SAYS HERE THAT ITS SOURCE FOR AT LEAST SOME DOCUMENTS IS THE FEDERAL REGISTER – WHICH FALLS UNDER THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES.
HOWEVER, THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES TOLD SNOPES THE DIGITAL DATABASE, WHERE THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION PULLED THE IMAGES, USES A **COPY OF THE PRESIDENT’S SIGNATURE THAT “COMES FROM ONE GRAPHIC FILE” FOR ONLINE POSTINGS OF SIGNED DOCUMENTS
HERE’S THEIR STATEMENT –
“At the beginning of each administration, the White House sends a sample of the President’s signature to the Office of the Federal Register, which uses it to create the graphic image for all Presidential Documents published in the Federal Register.”
IN OTHER INDEPENDENT REVIEWS FROM SEVERAL OUTLETS –
THEY FOUND SIGNED DOCUMENTS FROM OTHER PRESIDENTS – INCLUDING TRUMP – FEATURED IDENTIcAL SIGNATURES ON THE FEDERAL REGISTER’S DATABASE.
ITS STILL UNCLEAR AT THIS TIME HOW OFTEN THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION USED THE AUTOPEN –
WITH BIDEN OFFICIALS NOT RESPONDING TO MEDIA COMMENT OVER AUTOPEN QUESTIONS AT THE TIME OF THIS RECORDING.
BUT REPORTS OF ITS USAGE IN GENERAL – CAUGHT THE ATTENTION OF TRUMP – WHO HAD THIS TO SAY MONDAY.
“It looked like we had an autopen for a president…we would’ve been better off if we had probably.”
“The whole subject of autopen, did he know what he was doing? Did he authorize it or did somebody maybe a radical left lunatic just sign what that person wants.”
“To sign pardons and the things he signed with an autopen is disgraceful.”
THE PRESIDENT’S COMMENT CAME AFTER THIS POST FROM TRUMP ON TRUTH SOCIAL SUNDAY –
SAYING BIDEN’S PARDONS ARE “VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THEY WERE DONE BY AUTOPEN.”
CNN’S KAITLIN COLLINS ASKED WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY KAROLINE LEAVITT– ABOUT TRUMP’S TRUTH SOCIAL POST – ASKING TO CLARIFY WHETHER TRUMP WAS TRYING TO VOID BIDEN’S PARDONS OVER THE ALLEGED AUTOPEN SIGNATURES.
LEAVITT RESPONDED SAYING TRUMP WAS ONLY BEGGING THE QUESTION.
TAKE A LISTEN.
“That would propose perhaps criminal or illegal behavior if staff members were signing the president of the united states autograph without his consent.
Kaitlin: “the president is on the record talking about issuing preemptive pardons to these people.”
“But was he aware of the signature being used on every single pardon? That’s a question you should ask the biden white house.”
“Is there any evidence of that?”
“Youre a reporter, you should find out. Sean?”
LET’S TAKE A LOOK AT SOME OF THE HEADLINES AND FRAMING OF THE STORY – FIRST FROM NEWS OUTLETS WITH A RIGHT POLITICAL BIAS.
THE DAILY WIRE – “Biden Pardons Were Signed With Autopen While He Was On Vacation, Watchdog Finds”
THE NEW YORK POST “Biden used ‘autopen signature’ on many official WH docs, raising concerns over his awareness.”
FOX NEWS – Biden’s ‘autopen signature’ appears on most official docs, raising concerns over who controlled the WH: report.
WHILE NEWS OUTLETS ON THE RIGHT – **EMPHASIZED “CONCERNS” OVER BIDEN’S USE OF THE AUTOPEN –
NEWS OUTLETS ON THE LEFT – DISMISSED ANY LEGALITY ISSUES.
HERE’S HEADLINES FROM NEWS OUTLETS WITH A LEFT POLITICAL BIAS:
NPR – “Trump tries to void Biden’s pardons, blaming autopen. Many presidents have used it”
AND FROM SNOPES – “Biden may have signed documents with autopen — like many presidents before him.”
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS – “Presidents have used autopens for decades. Now Trump objects to Biden’s use of one”
THERE ARE PATTERNS IN THE WAY THE RIGHT TOLD THE STORY –
AND THE WAY THE LEFT TOLD IT.
RIGHT-LEANING OUTLETS – FOCUSED IN ON BIDEN’S MENTAL ACQUITY AND SUGGESTIONS THAT SOMEONE ELSE COULD HAVE BEEN MAKING PRESIDENTIAL DECISIONS UNDER THE GUISE OF THE AUTOPEN.
LEFT-LEANING OUTLETS – FOCUSED ON THE USE OF AUTOSIGNATURES – AND THE ACT OF PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS – BEING LAWFUL AND NOTHING NEW.
THIS ANGLE WOULD LARGELY DISMISS ANY SUGGESTIONS OF MALFEASANCE OVER BIDEN’S USE OF THE AUTOPEN.
IN FOX NEWS’ WRITE UP –
THE OUTLET HIGHLIGHTED SEVERAL INSTANCES WHEN BIDEN’S MENTAL FITNESS WAS QUESTIONED DURING HIS PRESIDENCY.
FOX WROTE “Biden’s 81 years of age and mental acuity fell under public scrutiny after years of conservatives questioning the commander in chief’s mental fitness.”
“Special counsel Robert Hur” CALLED “biden a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”
“Biden faced backlash for a handful of gaffes and miscues in the days leading up to his ill-fated debate against Trump.”
“when the big debate day arrived, Biden missed his marks repeatedly.”
FOX NEWS MADE MENTION OF AN EXCHANGE HOUSE SPEAKER MIKE JOHNSON SAYS HE HAD WITH BIDEN THAT CONCERNED HIM –
“Speaker Johnson recounted that Biden didn’t remember signing an order freezing new liquid natural gas exports in 2024.”
“I walked out of that meeting with fear and loathing because I thought, ‘We are in serious trouble – who is running the country?’” Johnson said.”
IN NPR’S WRITE UP – THE OUTLET HIGHLIGHTED A PRECEDENT OF THE AUTOPEN BEING USED –
AND DISMISSED CONCERNS.
NPR WROTE – “President Trump is claiming without evidence that some of former President Joe Biden’s actions are invalid because he allegedly used a machine to automate signatures on documents, which is a longstanding practice in the White House.”
“Trump’s rhetoric fans the flames of conspiracies about Biden not really being in charge during his presidency. While concerns about Biden’s fitness for office forced him to call off his reelection campaign, the right has taken that to an extreme.”
“claims that autopen signatures could be nullifying are more unusual, especially since multiple presidents have used the devices over the years.”
IN THE FOX NEWS STORY – THERE WAS NO MENTION OF PRIOR PRESIDENTS USING THE AUTOPEN.
IN NPR’S STORY – EXAMPLES OF BIDEN’S MENTAL FITNESS BEING QUESTIONED WERE OMITTED.
IT’S THE SAME STORY – BUT TOLD WITH TWO DIFFERENT NARRATIVES.
WHEN IT COMES TO WHETHER OR NOT BIDEN’S PARDONS CAN BE RESCINDED –
NEWS OUTLETS SPOKE WITH DIFFERENT EXPERTS – WHO HAD DIFFERENT OPINIONS.
THE RIGHT’S SOURCE – SAYING THE PARDONS COULD BE THROWN OUT IN COURT.
THE LEFT’S SOURCE SAYING – THE PARDONS ARE OFFICIAL ACTS – AND LAWFUL.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS – A LEFT OUTLET – WROTE – On whether pardons must be in writing or by the president’s own hand, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has said the ”plain language of the Constitution imposes no such limitation.” Biden’s statement accompanying those pardons make clear they **were official acts, said Carl Tobias, professor at the University of Richmond law school.
THE NEW YORK POST SPOKE WITH A DOJ OFFICIAL WHO “told The Post that they believed the preemptive pardons by Biden were vulnerable on an entirely different basis because they did not specify what crimes were being pardoned. That ex-official said that courts were likely to uphold the use of the autopen, but could find that the years-long legal reprieves for unspecified past crimes were impermissibly broad.”
THE SAME SENTIMENT PLAYED OUT ON THE NETWORKS.
CNN ON THE LEFT SPEAKING TO A FORMER PROSECUTOR WHO DISMISSED ANY LEGAL PATHWAY.
“Can he do this? Can he say the pardons are void?” “no.”
“We’ve had autopen for decades…there is no such thing as an unpardon power.”
AND FOX NEWS ON THE RIGHT SPEAKING TO AN ATTORNEY WHO SEES A PATH TO UNDO BIDEN’S PARDONS.
“Can these pardons be invalidated…charge some of these folks and have a court weigh in on that.”
IN SUMMARY – A CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT WATCHDOG GROUP WAS FIRST TO POSE THE ALLEGATIONS – THAT THE USE OF THE AUTOPEN MAY HAVE BEEN ABUSED BY THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION.
RIGHT NOW – THE WHITE HOUSE SAYS ITS SOMETHING TO LOOK INTO–
AND PRESIDENT TRUMP SAYS WHETHER BIDEN’S AUTOPEN SIGNATURE ON CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ARE VALID “WOULD BE UP TO A COURT” TO DECIDE — THOUGH HE DID DECLARE SOME PARDONS “VOID” IF THEY WERE SIGNED WITH AN AUTOPEN
WHILE THE GOVERNMENT WATCHDOG SUGGESTED DOZENS OF DOCUMENTS WERE SIGNED BY AUTOPEN –
THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES RELEASED A STATEMENT SAYING ITS STANDARD PRACTICE TO NOT REFLECT ORIGINAL SIGNATURES IN DIGITIZED VERSIONS OF DOCUMENTS.
SO THE ANSWER TO HOW VIGOROUSLY THE AUTOPEN FEATURE WAS USED BY THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IS STILL INCONCLUSIVE.
MUCH OF THE NEWS COVERAGE SURROUNDING BIDEN’S USE OF THE AUTOPEN HAS BEEN DRIVEN BY **SPECULATION OVER ITS LEGALITY, WHETHER BIDEN KNEW OF HIS SIGNATURE BEING STAMPED, AND POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES – SUCH AS THE POTENTIAL OF PARDONS BEING REVOKED.
MEDIA OUTLETS ARE PRESENTING **CASES FOR AND AGAINST.
THESE SPECULATIVE OPINIONS ARE OFTEN OVERSHADOWING THE FACTS OF THE STORY.
AND THAT’S YOUR BIAS BREAKDOWN.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- President Donald Trump claimed that former President Joe Biden's pardons are invalid because they were allegedly signed using an autopen, a machine that duplicates signatures, but provides no evidence for this claim.
- The Oversight Project has been a key source of the narrative about Biden's use of an autopen for signing documents, although legal experts disagree on the validity of this claim.
- Legal experts stated that nothing in the Constitution requires a pardon to be hand-signed, and therefore it cannot be rescinded based on the signature method.
- Biden's use of an autopen for signing documents is common among presidents, with past examples including Barack Obama, who used one to sign legislation while abroad.
- Donald Trump is accusing Joe Biden of not physically signing key pardons, claiming they were signed with an autopen, according to analysis from The Heritage Foundation.
- Legal experts affirmed that pardons signed by an autopen are valid under U.S. law, contrary to Trump's claims.
- Professor Erin Delaney stated that Trump's attempt to rescind Biden's pardons would violate constitutional norms.
- Biden issued several pardons on Jan. 19, including those for Hunter Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci, just before Trump took office.
- The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project claimed former President Joe Biden used an autopen to sign pardons.
- President Donald Trump asserted that the pardons are void since Biden did not personally sign them.
- Trump indicated that the legality of the pardons could be challenged in court.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
Boeing 737 Max, adorned with a Chinese airline’s logo, returns to US soil
Read4 hrs ago -
AP Photo/Joseph Frederick
Thousands turn out for nationwide ‘50501’ protests against Trump
Read7 hrs ago -
AP Images
Joe Rogan jokes about Katy Perry’s Blue Origin flight, Wendy’s clarifies online jab
Read10 hrs ago -
Universal Images Group via Getty Images
CT scans, often used to diagnose illness, could cause 5% of cancer: Study
ReadYesterday