Big city papers struggle with AI after fake books found on summer reading list


Summary

List includes fake books

At least 10 books in a syndicated list that ran in major newspapers such as the Chicago Sun-Times was not real. The writer of the list said he used artificial intelligence for research.

Sun-Times responds

A spokesperson for the Chicago Sun-Times said the content was not approved by the newsroom. Still, the spokesperson said, this was an "unacceptable" error.

Writer of list fired

King Features Syndicate, which supplies content to newspaper around the country and produced the list, fired the writer responsible.


Full story

If you picked up the Chicago Sun-Times or another major newspaper recently and checked out the “Heat Index: Your Guide to the Best of Summer” book list, you might have had trouble finding many of the recommended titles. That’s because at least 10 of them, like “Tidewater Dreams” by Isabel Allende and “The Last Algorithm” by Andy Weir, don’t actually exist.

The list, which also featured names of other well-known authors, was part of a special 56-page advertising supplement produced by King Features Syndicate, a division of the Hearst Corporation. King Features supplies content like comics, puzzles, games and lifestyle features to newspapers around the country. The same summer reading list, created using artificial intelligence, also appeared in The Philadelphia Inquirer and may have been featured in other outlets as well.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

Italian daily newspaper Il Foglio was the first newspaper in the world to publish an entire edition written by AI as part of a monthlong experiment on how the technology is reshaping journalism.

Writer failed to fact-check AI bot

The list’s author, Marco Buscaglia, a contract writer for King Features, took full responsibility for the mistake. The problem started, he said, when he relied too heavily on AI for research and didn’t double-check what it produced.

“A really stupid error on my part,” Buscaglia wrote on Facebook, according to ABC News.

“This time, I did not (fact-check) and can’t believe I missed it because it’s so obvious,” Buscaglia told 404 Media. “No excuses … On me 100 percent and I’m completely embarrassed.”

Speaking to The Atlantic, Buscaglia said he typically gathers book recommendations from reputable sources and includes proper citations.

“I’ll find things online and say, ‘Hey, according to Oprah.com, a mai tai is a perfect drink.’ I’ll source it; I’ll say where it’s from,” Buscaglia said.

However, in this case, the AI-generated list was submitted and approved by the syndication company without any editorial review or human fact-checking.

One of the authors on the list, Rebecca Makkai, confirmed on Bluesky that she did not write a book called “Boiling Point.”

“This was not the day I expected to have,” Makkai said.

Enough blame to go around

“This is licensed content that was not created by, or approved by, the Sun-Times newsroom,” Victor Lim, a spokesperson for the Chicago Sun-Times, said in a statement to NPR. “But it is unacceptable for any content we provide to our readers to be inaccurate.”

Lisa Hughes, publisher and CEO of The Philadelphia Inquirer, gave a similar response, according to the New York Post.

“The Inquirer newsroom is not involved in the production of these syndicated features, nor was it involved in creating Heat Index,” Hughes said.

The Inquirer has worked with King Features for over 40 years to provide content like comics and puzzles.

King Features has since fired Buscaglia. Still, the incident highlights growing concerns about the use of AI in journalism, especially as more media companies turn to automation to fill content gaps caused by layoffs and budget cuts.

The Sun-Times’ parent company, Chicago Public Media, is currently facing a projected $3-5 million budget shortfall. In March 2025, the Sun-Times Guild confirmed that seven union members accepted buyouts and would be leaving the newsroom.

In response to the summer reading list, the Guild said it is “deeply disturbed that AI-generated content was printed alongside our work.”

“We take great pride in the union-produced journalism that goes into the respected pages of our newspaper and on our website,” the Guild wrote on X, adding that “the fact that it was sixty-plus pages of this ‘content’ is very concerning — primarily for our relationship with our audience but also for our union’s jurisdiction.”

A growing trend

Other outlets have faced similar issues with AI-generated content. In 2023, Sports Illustrated cut ties with a content provider after it was discovered that stories were published under fake bylines. Although the company denied the stories were written by AI, the damage had been done. That same year, CNET corrected 41 out of 77 AI-generated articles after an internal review found numerous factual mistakes.

Even smaller newsrooms have been caught in AI-related controversies. A reporter at the Cody Enterprise in Wyoming resigned after it was revealed he had used AI to invent quotes in his articles.

So if you’re at your local library looking for “Hurricane Season” by Brit Bennett, don’t bother — the title is real, but the author is Fernanda Melchor.

Cassandra Buchman (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

Why this story matters

The incident of newspapers publishing AI-generated content with nonexistent books highlights the risks and challenges of integrating artificial intelligence into journalism without adequate review or fact-checking.

AI in journalism

The use of AI in producing news content is increasing, raising concerns about the accuracy and reliability of information published without thorough human oversight.

Fact-checking lapses

The failure to properly fact-check AI-generated content led to the publication of false information, underscoring the ongoing need for rigorous editorial review in newsrooms.

Media industry pressures

Budget cuts and staffing shortages in the news industry are prompting greater reliance on automation, which can result in errors that undermine public trust.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 21 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Of the 15 books included in the Chicago Sun-Times' published summer reading list, only five were real, according to NPR and other sources. This illustrates the potential impact of unchecked AI-generated content on reader trust and publisher credibility.

Community reaction

Many community members, especially journalists and authors, expressed concern and disappointment. According to statements from the Chicago Sun-Times Guild and professional book critics, the publication of fabricated book titles hurt the reputation of the newsroom and raised alarms about the erosion of trust, the dangers of AI misuse, and the reduction of professional editorial review.

The players

Key figures include Marco Buscaglia (freelance writer and creator of the list), King Features (content distributor), Hearst Newspapers (King Features’ parent), Chicago Sun-Times and The Philadelphia Inquirer (newspapers), Victor Lim (Chicago Public Media spokesperson), and the Sun-Times Guild (employees’ union).

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the AI-generated fake book list primarily as a cultural and epistemological crisis, emphasizing the erosion of human elements in knowledge and journalistic integrity through terms like "backlash," "fake" and warnings that AI "eliminates the human element," signaling broader threats to truth and learning traditions.
  • Media outlets in the center adopted a more dispassionate tone, stressing practical newsroom ethics and AI’s "hallucination" tendency, advocating structured human oversight.
  • Media outlets on the right focused on individual culpability. They labeled the writer "lazy" and mocked the error as an avoidable failure, portraying AI misuse as a personal lapse rather than systemic.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

24 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Chicago Sun-Times and other major newspapers published an AI-generated summer reading list that included multiple nonexistent book titles and received strong backlash.
  • The Chicago Sun-Times Guild expressed deep concern over the publication of AI-generated content, highlighting its impact on their journalism reputation.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Chicago Sun-Times published an AI-generated 2025 summer reading list including many nonexistent book titles, drawing major backlash in Chicago and beyond.
  • The list was produced by a third party using artificial intelligence without newsroom approval, reflecting wider cuts and loss of expertise in book criticism.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • King Features has fired Marco Buscaglia for using AI to create a summer reading list that included nonexistent books.
  • Both the Chicago Sun-Times and The Philadelphia Inquirer have removed the inaccurate supplement from their digital editions.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™