Bipartisan push in Congress to keep US out of Israel-Iran conflict


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Congressional resolutions

Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California and Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky have introduced a bipartisan War Powers Resolution in the House aimed at keeping U.S. forces out of the Israel-Iran conflict.

Presidential stance

President Trump appears reluctant to negotiate with Iran. He told reporters, “I’m not too much in the mood to negotiate” and posted on social media that “Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign” and called for the evacuation of Tehran.

White House response

White House Deputy Assistant Alex Pfeiffer stated on social media that U.S. forces are in a defensive posture and have not conducted offensive strikes on Iran. When President Trump was asked by reporters about alternatives to a ceasefire, he responded that something better would be “an end or [Iran] giving up entirely.”


Full story

As President Donald Trump returned to Washington early from the G7 summit in Western Canada to meet with his National Security Council on the escalating Israel-Iran conflict, two House lawmakers were busy trying to drum up support for legislation to keep the United States out of it. Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California and Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky are leading a War Powers Resolution aimed at keeping U.S. forces out of the conflict.

What does the House resolution call for?

“No war in Iran,” Khanna posted on X. “It’s time for every member to go on record. Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people? I am proud to co-lead this bi-partisan War Powers Resolution with Rep. Massie that is privileged and must receive a vote.”

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

Two House members are sponsoring bipartisan legislation aimed at keeping the U.S. out of the conflict between Israel and Iran. It would require Congress to explicitly authorize any U.S. involvement.

Massie echoed the sentiment, writing, “This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution. I’m introducing a bipartisan War Powers Resolution… to prohibit our involvement. I invite all members of Congress to cosponsor this resolution.”

What is Trump saying about Iran?

While Congress debates the path forward, Trump appears to be weighing his next move. 

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One early Tuesday, Trump said bluntly: “I’m not too much in the mood to negotiate” with Iran.

He also posted on his Truth Social that Iran missed its window to negotiate peace and urged people to flee the Iranian capital.

“Iran should have signed the ‘deal’ I told them to sign. What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!” Trump wrote.

In an earlier post, the president denied reports that peace talks were underway, saying: “I have not reached out to Iran for ‘Peace Talks’ in any way, shape, or form. This is just more HIGHLY FABRICATED FAKE NEWS.”

Senate joins the effort with its own resolution

Across the Capitol, Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia has introduced a similar War Powers Resolution in the Senate titled Resolution to Prevent War with Iran. As Straight Arrow News reported Monday, June 16, the measure raises concern about the “escalating violence in the Middle East and its potential to pull the U.S. into the conflict.”

“It is not in our national security interest to get into a war with Iran unless that war is absolutely necessary to defend the United States,” Kaine said in a statement announcing the resolution. “I am deeply concerned that the recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict.”

Like the House version, Kaine’s resolution is also privileged, requiring a timely vote. He emphasized that under the Constitution, only Congress has the power to declare war, and that any use of military force against Iran must come through a formal declaration or specific authorization.

White House response

Late Monday night, White House Deputy Assistant Alex Pfeiffer posted on X, saying U.S. forces remain in a defensive posture and have not conducted offensive strikes on Iran.

When asked by reporters what would be better than a ceasefire, Trump replied, “an end or [Iran] giving up entirely.”

Jack Henry (Video Editor), Jason Morrell (Morning Managing Editor), and Matt Bishop (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

Congressional efforts to restrict U.S. military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict highlight the constitutional question of war powers and growing concerns about potential American entanglement in another Middle East conflict.

War Powers Resolution

Legislation introduced by lawmakers in both the House and Senate seeks to assert congressional authority over decisions to engage in conflict with Iran, emphasizing the constitutional requirement for formal authorization before military action.

US involvement in Middle East

Lawmakers' efforts to prevent American military participation in the escalating Israel-Iran conflict reflect broader debates regarding the U.S. role in regional conflicts and concerns over entering another prolonged engagement.

Executive versus legislative authority

Statements from President Trump alongside congressional action illustrate ongoing tension between executive power and legislative oversight in decisions involving military force.