Blake Lively asks to drop two emotional distress claims in Justin Baldoni lawsuit


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Emotional distress claims

Blake Lively has filed to dismiss her emotional distress claims against Justin Baldoni, citing privacy concerns over her medical records.

Legal battle continues

Baldoni alleges Lively’s move is a tactic to avoid disclosure and possibly refile the claims later, calling her original lawsuit a publicity stunt.

Other claims pending

The case still includes 13 other accusations, including civil conspiracy, breach of contract and sexual harassment, pending a trial set for March 2026.


Full story

Blake Lively wants to pull back two emotional distress claims in her high-profile lawsuit against actor and director Justin Baldoni. But with over a dozen other accusations still standing, the legal drama is far from over.

According to Variety, Lively filed to dismiss claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress on Monday. The decision came shortly after Baldoni’s legal team requested access to Lively’s medical records, including therapy notes, via a HIPAA release.

What do the emotional distress claims mean?

The Cornell Legal Information Institute defines intentional infliction of emotional distress as when someone purposely or recklessly acts in a way that causes another person extreme emotional suffering, such as threatening to harm them.

Meanwhile, the State Bar of Michigan describes negligent infliction of emotional distress as when someone’s careless actions, without any physical contact, cause stress so severe that it results in a physical injury. According to court documents obtained by Newsweek, Lively alleges she still suffers from such injuries.

Baldoni’s response

In a letter filed by Baldoni’s attorneys and obtained by Variety, the legal team argues Lively wants to sidestep disclosure requirements.

“Ms. Lively wants to simultaneously refuse to disclose the information and documents needed to disprove that she suffered any emotional distress and/or that the Wayfarer Parties were the cause,” the letter states.

Baldoni’s attorneys also suggest Lively may be trying to preserve the right to refile the emotional distress claims at a later time, accusing her of using the original lawsuit as a publicity tactic.

Timeline of the dispute

The legal conflict began in December 2024 when Lively sued Baldoni, accusing him of sexual harassment and orchestrating a smear campaign during the production of “It Ends With Us.”

Since then, the case has pulled in additional high-profile names, including Taylor Swift and Ryan Reynolds, Lively’s husband.

Involvement of Taylor Swift and Ryan Reynolds

Baldoni alleged that Lively tried to pressure longtime friend Swift into making a public statement of support. However, a judge recently granted Lively’s team’s motion to dismiss that claim, per Deadline.

Reynolds, while not speaking out publicly, has filed to be removed from the case. In March, he submitted a motion to dismiss the claims made against him. Baldoni had countersued both Lively and Reynolds for civil extortion, defamation and invasion of privacy.

In a letter obtained by People in March, Reynolds’ lawyers said Baldoni’s countersuit was on the basis of Reynolds calling Baldoni a “predator” in private conversations.

“Mr. Reynolds has a First Amendment right to express his opinion of Mr. Baldoni, which should be comforting to a group of people who have repeatedly called Ms. Lively and Mr. Reynolds ‘bullies’ and other names over the past year,” Reynolds’ legal team said.

With the trial set for March 2026, Lively’s move to withdraw two claims still leaves 13 others on the table. Those include allegations of civil conspiracy, breach of contract and sexual harassment.

Matt Bishop (Digital Producer) and Harry Fogle (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

The Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni controversy highlights legal complexities surrounding defamation and emotional harm in Hollywood — and how deeply personal disputes can affect public figures’ reputations and careers.

Legal process

The withdrawals and ongoing nature of numerous claims in the case underscore the complexities of legal proceedings in disputes involving public figures.

Privacy and disclosure

Debates over access to personal records, such as Lively's medical documentation, illustrate challenges surrounding privacy and evidentiary requirements in court cases with emotional distress components.

Public scrutiny

The involvement of celebrities and related publicity raises broader questions about how high-profile lawsuits can affect reputations and shape public narratives.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 40 media outlets

Context corner

In U.S. civil litigation, when a plaintiff alleges emotional distress, it is standard legal procedure for the defense to request access to relevant medical records to assess the validity and extent of the claims. The historic tension between privacy and legal disclosure of such records is central to disputes like the current one between Lively and Baldoni.

Terms to know

Dismissal With Prejudice: When a legal claim is dismissed permanently and cannot be filed again. Dismissal Without Prejudice: The claim is withdrawn, but the plaintiff retains the right to refile it in the future. HIPAA Release: Consent required to access an individual’s protected medical information, often sought during litigation involving health claims.

Underreported

Few articles examine the potential long-term professional and reputational consequences this case could have for the broader entertainment industry, including working relationships and contracts on sets. Coverage also underplays the possible psychological toll ongoing public litigation may have on those involved and their families.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Blake Lively’s withdrawal of emotional distress claims as a calculated litigation strategy against aggressive, retaliatory tactics from Justin Baldoni’s team, employing emotionally charged terms like “press stunt” and “tired round of tabloid coverage” to cast Baldoni’s actions as manipulative and unjust.
  • Media outlets in the center remain procedural and cautious, highlighting ongoing legal complexities without dramatization.
  • Media outlets on the right focus more heavily on Baldoni’s $400 million countersuit, portraying Lively’s claims as potentially “frivolous” and emphasizing ties to high-profile figures like Taylor Swift, with rhetoric such as “outrageous and intentionally salacious” to discredit her.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

40 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Justin Baldoni's legal team sought access to Blake Lively's medical records as part of their case.
  • Lively continues to pursue other claims against Baldoni, including sexual harassment and retaliation, according to her lawyers.
  • Baldoni has countersued Lively, accusing her and her husband of trying to destroy his career, which he denies.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Blake Lively has withdrawn two claims in a federal lawsuit against Justin Baldoni and others on December 31, 2024, related to their work on "It Ends With Us."
  • The lawsuit emerged following Lively’s initial complaint to California’s Civil Rights Department and involves a counter $400 million suit filed by Baldoni alleging civil extortion and privacy invasion.
  • Recently, Lively decided to withdraw her intentional infliction of emotional distress claims, though without prejudice, prompting Baldoni’s team to request medical records and seek dismissal with prejudice.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Justin Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, stated they reached an impasse over medical records crucial to Lively's allegations.
  • Lively continues to allege severe emotional distress as part of various claims, including sexual harassment against Baldoni during the making of "It Ends With Us."
  • Baldoni has denied all accusations, emphasizing that Lively's claims are false and intended to harm his public image.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline