Brown University reaches $50M deal with Trump admin to restore federal funds


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

The deal

Brown University has reached an agreement with the Trump administration in which the school will pay $50 million in grants to restore more than $500 million in frozen funds.

Investigations

Federal grant money had been on hold as the Trump administration investigated the university’s DEI policy and alleged antisemitism on campus.

Columbia University

The agreement comes after Columbia University agreed to a more than $220 million settlement with the Trump administration last week.


Full story

The Trump administration has reached a deal worth tens of millions of dollars with Brown University that will reinstate federal funding to the school. The move marks a second significant agreement with a renowned institution after a more than $220 million settlement during the week of July 20 with Columbia University.

In exchange for Brown agreeing to a number of stipulations which aim to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs, the Trump administration will reestablish all formerly frozen grants from the Department of Health and Human Services, reinstate the university’s eligibility for future federal funds and close all ongoing investigations into the school, a White House official told CNN.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Where will the money go?

As part of the agreement announced on Wednesday, July 30, the Rhode Island school will pay $50 million in grants over 10 years to the state’s workforce development organizations, according to a press release from Brown University President Christina Paxson.

Paxson noted in a letter that the university is not making “any payments or fines to the federal government.” 

How is it different from Columbia University’s deal?

The deal differs from Columbia’s agreement, which requires the school to pay $200 million to the Treasury Department over a three-year period. Columbia also has to pay $21 million to settle investigations led by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Paxson stressed that the deal does not give the Trump administration any power to “dictate Brown’s curriculum or the content of academic speech.”

“The University’s foremost priority throughout discussions with the government was remaining true to our academic mission, our core values and who we are as a community,” Paxson said.

Meanwhile, Education Secretary Linda McMahon released a statement declaring, “The Trump administration is successfully reversing the decades-long-woke-capture of our nation’s higher education institutions.” 

What will change?

The terms of the deal state that Brown must “not engage in unlawful racial discrimination in admissions or university programming.” The school is also required to provide yearly reports to the Trump administration with data related to the subject, including admissions data on race.

The university is also set to implement definitions of “male” and “female” following an executive order signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year. The order dealt with “women’s sports, programming, facilities and housing,” as reported by CNN.

The resolution agreement also states that the institution’s health centers “will not perform gender reassignment surgeries on minors or prescribe them puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones.” Additionally, Brown “will take steps to improve the campus climate for Jewish students.”

Part of those efforts to combat antisemitism include conducting a survey on campus life for its Jewish students. The survey is said to feature questions about whether Jewish students feel safe on campus and their comfort in reporting incidents of antisemitism. It’s also slated to include student recommendations on how Brown can reduce harassment on campus and through social media, according to the resolution agreement.

Paxson’s remarks

Paxson said most of the deal’s rules codify policies and practices already in place. But she did acknowledge that some changes were due to pressure from the Trump administration. 

“There are other aspects of the agreement that were not part of previous federal review of Brown policies but are priorities of the federal administration in resolving the funding freeze.”

What happens next?

The deal reportedly now frees up more than $500 million in previously frozen grants. The money was on hold as the Trump administration probed the university’s DEI agenda and its response to accusations of antisemitism on campus.

The Trump administration had reportedly aimed for Columbia’s agreement to be the blueprint for other schools, noting Brown and Cornell Universities were on the brink of deals, as Straight Arrow News reported just days ago.

Meanwhile, the administration has started an investigation into Duke University, including its medical and law schools. 

The White House also remains in a legal battle with Harvard. However, The New York Times reports that the school is considering a potentially half-billion-dollar settlement to resolve the lawsuits.

Alex Delia (Deputy Managing Editor), Jake Larsen (Video Editor), and Julia Marshall (Morning Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The agreement between Brown University and the Trump administration highlights the federal government's influence over university policies by leveraging funding, raising debates about academic independence, discrimination policies and campus protections for various groups.

Federal oversight of universities

This theme is crucial as it shows how federal funding can be used to enforce compliance with government policies at educational institutions, directly affecting university operations and autonomy.

Non-discrimination and admissions policies

The resolution requires Brown to remove race as a factor in admissions and implement merit-based criteria, impacting ongoing national debates about diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education.

Campus protections and student rights

Changes to protections for Jewish students, definitions of sex in sports and facilities, and limits on gender-affirming care for minors reflect broader discussions about the rights and safety of diverse student populations on university campuses.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 137 media outlets

Community reaction

Local community members and Brown affiliates expressed concerns over financial strain and academic independence while some Jewish groups have called for proactive steps to improve campus climate following high-profile allegations of antisemitism.

Oppo research

Opponents of the agreement, including some faculty and political figures, argue that such deals set a precedent for governmental intrusion, potentially undermining institutional autonomy and threatening academic freedom in the pursuit of federal policy goals.

Policy impact

The agreement will reshape future admissions and student services policies at Brown, affecting how race and gender are considered, and is likely to serve as a template for similar arrangements at other universities facing federal scrutiny.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Brown University deal as a correction of an unjust funding freeze, emphasizing government overreach and the administration’s effort to dismantle a “woke-capture” of academia, with emotionally charged terms like “bully” and “restore” signaling victimization and resistance.
  • Media outlets in the center adopt a more neutral tone detailing broader funding impacts and legal context, and both sides converge on the deal’s factual restoration of funds and rejection of formal wrongdoing, reflecting deeper ideological tensions concerning federal authority, campus culture and academic autonomy.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight the Trump administration’s enforcement success, portraying Brown as acquiescing to “Trump’s Demanded Reforms” and celebrating the preservation of “academic freedom” through a “voluntary agreement,” employing assertive language such as “wins” and “bows” to underscore institutional accountability.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

137 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Brown University reached a settlement with the U.S. government, agreeing not to engage in racial discrimination in admissions and to provide access to admissions data for compliance checks on merit-based admissions.
  • Under the agreement, Brown is prohibited from performing gender-affirming surgeries on minors or prescribing puberty blockers.
  • The Trump administration's settlement requires the National Institutes of Health to pay over $50 million in reimbursements to Brown University.
  • Brown President Christina H. Paxson stated that the agreement balances ethical obligations with the defense of academic freedom.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On July 30, 2025, Brown University announced it had reached an agreement with the Trump administration to restore federal research funding and resolve ongoing discrimination investigations.
  • The deal followed a funding freeze related to alleged antisemitism and discrimination, while similar scrutiny affected Duke and Harvard universities.
  • Brown agreed to adopt the administration’s definitions of male and female, bar gender-affirming care for minors, and provide admissions data for compliance monitoring.
  • Brown president Christina Paxson stated that the agreement reflects key goals of the federal government in addressing the funding freeze and balances the university's legal responsibilities with the protection of academic freedom.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Brown University announced a voluntary agreement with the federal government to restore research funding.
  • The agreement resolves reviews concerning Brown's compliance with federal nondiscrimination obligations, particularly regarding the harassment of Jewish students.
  • Brown will pay $50 million in grants to workforce development organizations in Rhode Island over ten years.
  • The agreement will restore medical and health science research funding and reimburse over $50 million in unpaid federal grant costs.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.