CA sues Trump for federalizing National Guard after violence at ICE protests


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

California files suit

California has sued President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for deploying National Guard troops without state coordination amid immigration-related protests.

Back-and-forth

Tensions escalated after Trump backed a suggestion by "border czar" Tom Homan to arrest Gov. Gavin Newsom, who challenged Homan to follow through.

Weekend protests

Violent demonstrations in Los Angeles and San Francisco led to injuries, arrests and widespread unrest over the weekend.


Full story


California has filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth after Trump federalized the National Guard on Sunday, June 8, in response to protests that ultimately turned violent in major California cities. Trump backed “border czar” Tom Homan’s idea to arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom, after Newsom dared him to “get it over with.”

California files lawsuit over federal deployment

California Attorney General Rob Bonta and the state of California have filed a lawsuit against Trump and Hegseth for deploying National Guard troops from San Diego to Los Angeles.

“Let me be clear: There is no invasion. There is no rebellion. The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends,” Bonta said in a statement. “Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the president’s authority under the law — and not one we take lightly. We’re asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order.”

Protests also turned violent in San Francisco and escalated Sunday evening. Two police officers were injured and approximately 150 people were arrested, ABC 7 reported.

Federal forces deployed without state coordination

On Sunday, Trump federalized the National Guard and deployed 2,000 troops to California. He placed an additional 500 Marines on standby. Newsom had not requested federal assistance and said the federal government never coordinated with him or his administration.

The governor echoed Bonta’s statement and said Trump deployed the troops “to manufacture chaos and violence.” By Sunday evening, Newsom was asking Homan to follow through on an alleged threat of arresting him.

Homan weighs legal actions against state officials

NBC reporter Jacob Soboroff had asked Homan if Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass were at risk of being arrested.

“I’ll say it about anybody, if you cross that line,” Homan said. “It’s a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It’s a felony to impede law enforcement from doing their job.”

Soboroff followed up and asked Homan if he thought the Los Angeles mayor was committing a felony.

“If she crosses that line, we’ll ask the DOJ to prosecute,” Homan responded. “Do I think she’s crossed the line? I don’t think she’s crossed the line yet.”

Then the NBC reporter asked Newsom about Homan not ruling out the possibility of arresting an elected official if they break the law and commit a felony.

“Come after me, arrest me,” Newsom said. “Let’s just get it over with, tough guy. You know? I don’t give a damn.”

Homan responded to Newsom Monday morning, June 9, during an appearance on “Fox & Friends,” claiming the reporter had been dishonest.

“Then the reporter asked me ‘Well could Governor Newsom or Mayor Bass be arrested?’ I said ‘Well, no one is above the law. If they cross that line and commit a crime, absolutely they can.’ So there was no discussion about arresting Newsom.”

Trump weighs in: ‘I would do it’

Meanwhile, a different reporter told Trump that Newsom was daring Homan to arrest him.

“I would do it if I were Tom,” Trump said. “I think it’s great.”

Newsom addressed the president’s comments in a post on X and said, “The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don’t care if you’re a Democrat or a Republican — this is a line we cannot cross as a nation. This is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.”

Protests spark violence after ICE detentions

Protests turned violent in Los Angeles over the weekend after ICE agents detained dozens of immigrants who were in the country without proper documentation on Friday, June 6. People gathered at a federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles to show support for the individuals being detained, demanding their release.

City officials originally characterized the protests as peaceful, but they ultimately turned violent.

In response, the police declared the gathering an “unlawful assembly” and warned the protesters that if they did not leave, they could be arrested. Police used forceful crowd-control methods, including tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades to help break up the civil unrest.

According to the Los Angeles Police Department, a small number of people became violent and threw large pieces of concrete at officers. The violence continued into Saturday at multiple protests in which demonstrators lit cars on fire, vandalized property and blocked highways over the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

Harry Fogle (Video Editor), Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer), and Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

A legal and political conflict over federal authority and state sovereignty has emerged after President Trump federalized the California National Guard without state consent during protests, leading to a lawsuit and raising concerns about executive power and civil liberties.

Federal versus state authority

The dispute highlights constitutional questions about the limits of presidential power in deploying federal troops to states without coordination or consent from state officials.

Civil liberties and protest response

The deployment of troops and aggressive law enforcement tactics during protests following ICE detentions raises concerns about civil rights, crowd control and government accountability.

Political escalation

Statements and actions by federal and state leaders, including discussions about arresting elected officials, reflect a heightened level of political conflict that can influence public trust in democratic institutions.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 27 media outlets

Context corner

The federalization of a state’s National Guard without gubernatorial consent is rooted in rarely used legal provisions, typically reserved for extreme cases like invasions or rebellions. Historically, this tactic was employed during notable civil rights confrontations in the 1960s. This context informs the current dispute over federal versus state authority in crisis management.

Diverging views

"Left" category articles frame the deployment as unlawful and an overreach by the federal government, arguing that it escalated tensions and infringed on state sovereignty. In contrast, the "right" category tends to emphasize the necessity of restoring law and order and support the view that local authorities failed to manage the protests, justifying federal intervention.

Quote bank

Gavin Newsom stated, "There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner…is a serious breach of state sovereignty." President Trump responded, "If we had not done so, Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated." Attorney General Rob Bonta called the deployment "unlawful and unnecessary."

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the National Guard deployment as an "unlawful, unprecedented" overreach by the Trump administration, emphasizing legal challenges and portraying the intervention as politically motivated theater that escalates tensions.
  • Media outlets in the center adopted a more measured stance, emphasizing legal nuance and the human impact of immigration raids, thereby de-emphasizing the polarized blame narratives.
  • Media outlets on the right highlighted the necessity and legality of the deployment to restore order amid what they depict as violent “riots” and “insurrectionists,” stressing law-and-order themes and criticizing California officials as weak or obstructionist.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

27 total sources

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline