California sues Trump admin for axing $4 billion high-speed rail grant


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Lawsuit announced

California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the termination of $4 billion in federal funding for the state’s high-speed rail project.

Federal government cites project failures

The administration cited years of delays, no completed track, and rising costs as reasons for the cut.

CaHSRA disputes claims

The California High-Speed Rail Authority disputes the claims, insisting significant progress has been made and pledging to fight the decision.


Full story

California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced the California High-Speed Rail Authority is suing the Trump administration over the termination of $4 billion in federal grants toward the project. The lawsuit claims that the government terminated federal funds out of political spite, not due to any legitimate issue. It argues that President Donald Trump specifically targeted California because he dislikes the state.

“Trump’s termination of federal grants for California high-speed rail reeks of politics. It’s yet another political stunt to punish California,” Newsom said in a statement. “In reality, this is just a heartless attack on the Central Valley that will put real jobs and livelihoods on the line. We’re suing to stop Trump from derailing America’s only high-speed rail actively under construction.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Transportation secretary cited project failures for funding termination

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy formally terminated the federal funds on Wednesday, July 16, citing 16 years of failure with no completed high-speed track and escalating costs.

“This is California’s fault,” Duffy said in a statement. “Federal dollars are not a blank check — they come with a promise to deliver results. After over a decade of failures, CHSRA’s mismanagement and incompetence has proven it cannot build its train to nowhere on time or on budget. It’s time for this boondoggle to die.”

Duffy’s announcement came after several months of investigation and a comprehensive compliance review. A February report from California’s Inspector General said the Merced-to-Bakersfield section of the high-speed rail was behind schedule and $6.5 billion over budget. The review revealed that, after ten years of effort, workers had not constructed any high-speed rail track. To keep funding flowing, Newsom in May proposed extending the state’s carbon cap-and-trade auction and devoting an additional $1 billion of that revenue to the rail project.

According to Duffy, the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) tried, but failed, to fix major problems with the project, leading the Trump administration to cancel support for the project.

CHSRA CEO disputes termination and progress criticism

Ian Choudri, the CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, strongly disagreed with a plan to end the funding agreements in June.

“Termination of the cooperative agreements is unwarranted and unjustified,” Choudri said in a statement. “I must also take this opportunity to dispute, in the strongest possible terms, the misleading claim that the Authority has made ‘minimal progress to advance construction,’” he added. “The Authority’s work has already reshaped the Central Valley. We have built many of the viaducts, overpasses, and underpasses on which the first 119 miles of high-speed rail track will run.”

In a post on X, Newsom said the project is entering the track-laying phase and the state “will be exploring all options to fight this illegal action.”

Newsom has noted that the California High-Speed Rail project is the only high-speed rail system currently under construction. However, it is important to acknowledge that Florida’s privately operated high-speed rail system, Brightline, has already completed construction and is now fully operational. Brightline opened its doors to passengers in January 2018 after starting construction in late 2014.

Zachary Hill (Video Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A dispute over the termination of $4 billion in federal grants for California's high-speed rail project highlights conflicts between state and federal governments, raises questions about project management and oversight, and may impact the future of large-scale infrastructure initiatives in the United States.

Federal-state relations

The lawsuit filed by California against the federal government illustrates tensions over control, funding, and political dynamics between state and federal authorities.

Project accountability and oversight

Disagreements over the progress and management of the rail project emphasize the challenges in overseeing major public infrastructure projects and ensuring effective use of taxpayer funds.

Infrastructure and economic impact

The potential loss of federal funding and delays in the rail project could affect job creation, regional economic development, and future investments in high-speed rail and other infrastructure nationwide.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 78 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The California high-speed rail project's costs have grown from an original estimate of $33 billion and $45 billion to a range between $89 and $135 billion, according to multiple sources and officials. The project has spent approximately $13-15 billion so far and was expected to receive an additional $4 billion in federal funding before the cut. The project has also created about 15,000 jobs.

Community reaction

Local responses are mixed but focus heavily on economic and employment concerns. According to multiple sources, some Central Valley communities express anxiety about job losses resulting from funding cuts. Proponents, including state officials, argue the project is vital for local economies and job creation, while opponents are frustrated with the project’s delays and ballooning expenditures.

History lesson

California’s high-speed rail faced federal funding cuts during Trump’s first term, which were later restored under the Biden administration. The American public sector has never completed a large-scale high-speed rail project, despite proposals dating back decades. Prior attempts at federally supported rail projects have often stalled due to funding, political, and regulatory barriers.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left prominently frame the Trump administration’s $4 billion funding cut to California’s high-speed rail as an illegal, politically motivated attack, emphasizing the project’s environmental benefits and portraying Gov. Newsom as a defender of innovation against a “woke” administration that “blasts” federal action and fears “handing China the future.”
  • Media outlet in the center adopt a procedural tone, emphasizing reports of no “viable path” forward and de-emphasizing emotive rhetoric.
  • Media outlets on the right vehemently deride the rail as a costly “boondoggle” and “train to nowhere,” spotlighting massive cost overruns and stalled progress to justify the funding termination as fiscally responsible, often using charged phrases like “failed” and “canceled.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

78 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • California is suing to challenge the Trump administration's cancellation of $4 billion in federal funding for the high-speed rail project linking San Francisco and Los Angeles.
  • Gov. Gavin Newsom claims the funding reversal is illegal and intends to fight it in court.
  • The California High-Speed Rail Authority maintains the project adheres to all federal funding rules and considers the funding cancellation illegal.
  • California's high-speed rail project aims to reduce pollution by using 100% renewable energy, potentially preventing over 150 million tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere in its first 50 years, according to the California High-Speed Rail Authority.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom filed the lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's termination of $4 billion in federal funding for California's high-speed rail project.
  • Following a review, the Department of Transportation report concluded the 300-page document found “no viable path” to completing the California high-speed rail, prompting threats to cancel $4 billion in June.
  • Newsom described the cut as `reeks of politics`, warning of 15,000 jobs at risk.
  • U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy said, "It’s time for this boondoggle to die," and said he would consult with the Department of Justice to recover funds.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced on July 17 that he would contest an illegal decision by the Trump administration to cancel $4 billion in federal funding for the high-speed rail project.
  • The high-speed rail project aims to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco with a three-hour ride and has faced delays since its inception, now estimated between $89 billion to $128 billion.
  • California Attorney General Rob Bonta indicated on July 17 that legal action would be imminent regarding the funding dispute.
  • Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy criticized the project for not laying any track after spending $15 billion over 16 years, while Newsom emphasized that the funding cancellation is illegal.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.