California Supreme Court to decide fate of cuts to rooftop solar payments


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Rooftop solar compensation

The California Supreme Court is hearing arguments regarding how homeowners are reimbursed for excess electricity generated from rooftop solar panels, after a 2023 rule significantly reduced the compensation utilities provide.

Solar adoption down

According to a February 2024 press release from the California Solar and Storage Association, there has been an 87% reduction in new rooftop solar installations and 17,000 industry layoffs since the rule change took effect in April 2023.

California’s energy goals

California aims to generate 100% of its energy from zero-emissions sources by 2045. Rooftop solar advocates say that keeping higher payments supports that goal while lowering costs. The utilities commission is concerned non-solar owners are paying too much.


Full story

A lawsuit before the California Supreme Court is pitting homeowners with rooftop solar against the state public utility commission and major private utility companies. The case centers on a 2023 rule that significantly reduced how much utilities pay for power generated by homes and small businesses.

The Center for Biological Diversity, along with two other environmental groups, filed a lawsuit at the end of 2022 against the California Public Utilities Commission over changes to the state’s net-metering policy, which determines how much rooftop solar owners get reimbursed on their utility bills. Major private utility companies Pacific Gas and Electric, San Diego Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison are defendants in the suit, along with the utilities commission.

California has some of the highest electricity costs in the country. At the same time, the state is pursuing a policy of generating 100% of its energy from zero-emission sources by 2045. Advocates for rooftop solar say it helps keep energy costs down while helping the state reach its environmental goals.

Utility companies have argued that rooftop solar owners were receiving excessive compensation at the expense of electric ratepayers without solar systems. The court decision could affect the trajectory of rooftop solar adoption, which has doubled in California since 2020.

How did the commission change solar rates?

The commission and utility companies have stated that the previous net energy metering program disproportionately shifted maintenance costs, effectively increasing electricity bills for homes that do not have solar panels. In official documents, the commission stated it made the changes to “control costs for all ratepayers” while still encouraging rooftop solar adoption.

“The former (net metering) system was unsustainable because of the burden that it was placing on customers without solar,” Mica Moore, an attorney for the utilities commission, said in an article for CalMatters

California has more rooftop solar than any other state, with 24% of homes having solar panels, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association.

Before the changes took effect, utility companies paid homeowners the retail rate — the same rate they charged other customers — for electricity generated from rooftop solar. With the new rules, the owners of any rooftop solar system installed after mid-April 2023 are only eligible to receive the “avoided costs” for the utility, which is a calculation of how much money the utility company would have had to spend to generate that amount of electricity on its own.

What are California rooftop solar advocates saying?

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

California leads the nation in rooftop solar installation, with 24% of homes equipped with solar panels, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association.

The shift from retail value to avoided cost led to a 70%–80% drop in compensation for rooftop solar owners, according to the California Solar and Storage Association.

Roger Lin, a senior attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, said the dramatic reductions are due in part because the utilities commission’s calculations for the avoided costs are a “big black box.” 

“The avoided cost calculator was never intended to measure the benefits of rooftop solar,” Lin said in an interview with Straight Arrow News.

He said the new policy has “severely diminished” new rooftop solar development, particularly for less affluent communities where the cost of installing solar panels is no longer worth the savings on electricity.

In a February 2024 press release, the California Solar and Storage Association said that since April 2023, it has seen an 87% reduction in new rooftop solar installations, resulting in the industry laying off 17,000 workers. 

Where does the lawsuit go next?

The California Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday, June 4, on whether to give deference to the utilities commissions’ decision to change net metering. The plaintiffs maintain that the commission overreached its regulatory authority by unilaterally making such changes. They also argued that the commission failed to properly consider the broader benefits of rooftop solar.

If the plaintiffs win both of their arguments, the commission will have to revert to the previous net metering rules. If the court rules entirely in the commission’s favor, the 2023 changes to net metering will remain in effect.

A split outcome could trigger additional legal processes to determine if the 2023 rules effectively weighed the costs and benefits of rooftop solar. To force the commission to revert to previous net metering rules, the plaintiffs would have to win. The court has 90 days to issue a ruling.

Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

A pending California Supreme Court decision on rooftop solar compensation could influence the future of clean energy adoption, electricity costs, and regulatory authority across the state.

Rooftop solar policy

Changes to net metering rules and homeowner compensation directly affect the affordability and attractiveness of rooftop solar installations, shaping the state's clean energy landscape.

Regulatory authority

The lawsuit challenges the California Public Utilities Commission's authority to alter energy compensation schemes, raising questions about the balance of regulatory power and oversight.

Energy equity and costs

Debates over how electricity costs and benefits are distributed between solar and non-solar customers highlight the broader issue of fairness and affordability within California's high-cost energy market.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 19 media outlets

History lesson

California’s net metering started in the late 1990s and evolved through several versions to encourage solar growth. Over the past decade, similar cost-shifting debates prompted policy revisions in other U.S. states. Historical outcomes show incentive reductions often lead to immediate declines in new solar installations and industry employment.

Policy impact

The new policies reduce compensation for new solar customers, lengthening payback periods for installations and lowering home resale values tied to older solar contracts. This deters further rooftop solar adoption, which some warn may undermine the achievement of California’s future carbon-free energy targets. Ratepayers unaffiliated with solar may see slight relief in grid-related charges.

Underreported

While much attention is given to solar company losses and policy battles, the direct impact on disadvantaged and low-to-moderate income groups — who face barriers to adopting solar or benefiting from incentives — receives less focus. There's limited discussion of alternative pathways to expand access to renewables among these communities apart from net metering reforms.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the CPUC’s cuts to rooftop solar incentives primarily as a legal and environmental violation, emphasizing broken promises to solar users and portraying the “cost shift” argument as a dismissible “red herring,” underscoring concerns about social equity and runaway utility profits.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight the legality and necessity of the cuts, stressing the need to address financial burdens on non-solar customers and framing AB 942 as a “billion-dollar saver” that “promotes equity,” using positive, authoritative language like “thoroughly reasoned decision.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

19 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The California Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the state's rooftop solar panel policies, focusing on a decision that reduced rates for excess energy by around 75% for solar customers.
  • Three environmental groups argue that the California Public Utilities Commission did not consider important benefits for customers and disadvantaged communities.
  • The California Public Utilities Commission stated that the new policy balances affordability for all customers and encourages renewable energy, despite resulting in a significant drop in solar installations this year.
  • The California Assembly passed a bill that could change contracts for solar customers, potentially harming rates for future homeowners with existing solar agreements.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Tuesday night, California lawmakers approved Assembly Bill 942, which aims to modify the compensation structure for rooftop solar customers throughout the state.
  • The bill responds to rising electricity costs and concerns about cost shifts from solar to non-solar ratepayers but faces disagreement on its fairness and effects.
  • AB 942 would reduce electricity bills for 10 million Californians by $423 million in 2026, but would end grandfathered net metering rates for new owners of solar-equipped homes.
  • The bill’s passage could hinder California’s clean energy goals by reducing solar investments, while utilities’ high profits and overspending remain contested causes of high energy rates.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Environmental groups argued that the California Public Utilities Commission violated state law by reducing financial incentives for residential rooftop solar panels in 2022, as presented before the California Supreme Court.
  • The commission's policy cut credits for power sent to the grid by up to 80%, affecting over two million solar systems in California.
  • Attorney General Rob Bonta's lawyers defended the commission's decision, while the justices are set to issue a decision in the next 90 days.
  • Assemblywoman Lisa Calderon introduced a bill to potentially save $2.5 billion for electric customers by amending the program for solar owners who installed their systems before April 2023.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™