Skip to main content
Military

China and Russia are pushing into the Arctic. Will NATO shift focus too?


  • Russia and China have been pushing their military capabilities in the Arctic zone, including a recent large-scale exercise. It included nearly 100,000 troops and over 400 warships and submarines.
  • The addition of Sweden into NATO has brought new capabilities into the fray.
  • With Russia and China focusing on the Arctic, should the U.S. and its allies focus on the northern region, too?

Full Story

When considering the activities of the Chinese and Russian militaries, an analyst’s initial reaction might be to focus on the Russian invasion of Ukraine and China’s consistent boundary pushing in the Indo-Pacific. While this is understandable, limiting the view of these conflicts to just these areas can be a mistake.

Both countries have increasingly aimed to develop a presence in the Arctic. This deepening collaboration between the world’s second- and third-largest militaries has captured the full attention of those responsible for defending North America’s northern frontier.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Russia and China flex their Arctic muscle

In mid-September 2024, Russia and China launched “Ocean-24,” a large-scale naval and air exercise that spanned the Pacific and Arctic Oceans. The exercise involved over 400 warships, submarines and support vessels, along with more than 120 aircraft and 90,000 troops.

Around the same time, NORAD tracked four Russian military aircraft entering Alaska’s air defense identification zone.

Maj. Gen. Chris McKenna, the Canadian NORAD region commander, discussed this violation during a panel at this year’s AFA Warfare Symposium called “Northern Tier Defense.” The panel addressed the looming threat of Russian and Chinese incursions in the Arctic.

“This summer, we had the Alaska region and myself countering the combined bomber patrol with the Chinese and the Russians, to take a run at the air defense identification zone for Alaska and Canada,” McKenna said. “The U.S. was shoulder to shoulder in that deterrent moment, and we were in position for that deterrent moment.”

McKenna emphasized that Arctic security is economic security, not just for Canada and the U.S., but for Euro-Atlantic partners as well.

“These are the threats, and this is the context that I sort of live and fight in,” he added.

In 2018, China declared itself a “near-Arctic state” as part of a strategy to gain regional influence. This title is self-proclaimed and not officially recognized by Arctic nations or international bodies. Nonetheless, China’s northward push appears to be part of a broader strategy to assert dominance at the top of the world.

Sweden in NATO

Maj. Gen. Jonas Wikman, chief of staff of the Swedish Air Force, expressed concerns about the urgency of speeding up the pace and investing in capabilities to operate in the Arctic as allies and partners.

“The assessment part and the operational part are, to me, the most important right now for us,” he said.

Wikman highlighted the importance of Sweden’s inclusion in NATO for defending northern regions from Russian and Chinese incursions.

“We also add geography when it comes to early warning capabilities,” he explained. “We cover from 55 to 69 degrees north, which is a wide area for early warning. We have air bases and a spaceport north of the polar circle, and we know how to operate that.”

The diversity of defenses from the northern Pacific to the northern Atlantic potentially gives the U.S. and its allies an edge in the Arctic. Russia and China generally operate from a single system, but they will have to deal with far more than that.

Diversifying technology in the Arctic

Scott Gilloon, senior director of mission architecture at General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, noted the advantage of having multiple systems.

“Imagine an adversary having to approach it from, ‘Hey, what does Saab’s system do?’ They have to approach it from all of us,” Gilloon said. “That is very powerful, not only in terms of generating and processing information but also in attacking the problem.”

A shifting focus?

The Arctic has not been a significant focus for U.S. defense spending in the past, likely because most countries with claims in the region were U.S. allies, except for Russia. China only started developing its Arctic strategy in the last six years.

While global politics in the Arctic are shifting, especially as climate change makes the waters easier to navigate, the perception that the U.S. is falling behind in Arctic policy could soon change. NATO continues to strengthen its defense plans in the region.

Access the full Weapons and Warfare episode here.

Access all Weapons and Warfare podcast episodes here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

[Ryan Robertson]

WHEN IT COMES TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE CHINESE AND RUSSIAN MILITARIES, YOUR INITIAL REACTION COULD BE TO AUTOMATICALLY TURN YOUR ATTENTION TO RUSSIA’S ILLEGAL INVASION OF UKRAINE, AND CHINA’S CONSISTANT BOUNDRY PUSHING IN THE INDO PACIFIC. AND WHILE WE’D FORGIVE YOU FOR DOING THAT,  LIMITING YOU FIELD OF VIEW TO THOSE REGIONS WOULD BE A MISTAKE. 

THAT’S BECAUSE BOTH COUNTRIES ARE INCREASINGLY INTENT ON DEVELOPING A PRESENCE IN THE ARTIC. SO MUCH SO THIS DEEPENING COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WORLD’S SECOND- AND THIRD-LARGEST MILITARIES HAS THE FULL ATTENTION OF THOSE CHARGED WITH DEFENDING NORTH AMERICA’S NORTHERN TIER. AND THAT’S THE SUBJECT OF THIS WEEK’S DEBRIEF.

IN MID-SEPTEMBER OF LAST YEAR, RUSSIA AND CHINA LAUNCHED “OCEAN-24,” A LARGE-SCALE NAVAL AND AIR EXERCISE THAT SPANNED THE PACIFIC AND ARCTIC OCEANS. IT INVOLVED OVER 400 WARSHIPS, SUBMARINES, AND SUPPORT VESSELS WITH MORE THAN 120 AIRCRAFT AND 90,000 TROOPS.

AND OH YEAH, AROUND THE SAME TIME, NORAD TRACKED FOUR RUSSIAN MILITARY AIRCRAFT ENTERING ALASKA’S AIR DEFENSE IDENTIFICATION ZONE.

[Maj. Gen. Chris McKenna, Canadian NORAD Region Commander]

“This summer, we had the Alaska Region and myself countering the combined bomber patrol with the Chinese and the Russians conducting a bounce to Ranadier to take a run at the air defense identification zone for Alaska and Canada. And the US were shoulder to shoulder in that deterrent moment, and we were in position for that deterrent moment.”

[Ryan Robertson]

MAJOR GENERAL CHRIS MCKENNA, THE CANADIAN NORAD REGION COMMANDER, WAS PART OF A PANEL AT THIS YEAR’S AFA WARFARE SYMPOSIUM CALLED NORTHERN TIER DEFENSE, THAT ADDRESSED THE LOOMING THREAT OF RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INCURSIONS IN THE ARCTIC.

[Maj. Gen. Chris McKenna, Canadian NORAD Region Commander]

“Arctic security, in my view, is economic security, not just for Canada and the US, but for our Euro Atlantic partners, fundamentally economic security. So these are the threats, and this is the context that I sort of live and fight in.”

[Ryan Robertson]

IN 2018, CHINA DECLARED ITSELF A “NEAR-ARCTIC STATE” AS PART OF ITS STRATEGY TO GAIN INFLUENCE.  WE SHOULD NOTE THAT THIS TITLE IS SELF-PROCLAIMED AND NOT OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZED BY ARCTIC NATIONS OR INTERNATIONAL BODIES. NONETHELESS, CHINA’S NORTHWARD PUSH APPEARS TO BE PART OF A BROADER STRATEGY TO ASSERT DOMINANCE AT THE TOP OF THE WORLD

[Maj. Gen. Jonas Wikman, Chief of Staff of the Swedish Air Force]

“In my mind, I think my biggest concern is this, that we fail to recognize. Is the urge to speed up the pace, to get back on track when it comes to the Arctic, when it comes to invest, invest in our capability, in our capability to operate in Arctic as allied and partners, and fail to really assess the atmosphere in the Arctic. I think that’s the assessment part, and the operational part is, to me, the most important part right now for us.”

[Ryan Robertson]

FOR MAJOR GENERAL JONAS WIKMAN, CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE SWEDISH AIR FORCE, WHOSE COUNTRY IS ONE OF THE NEWEST MEMBERS OF NATO, THE TIMING OF THEIR INCLUSION IS A CRITICAL FACTOR IN DEFENDING THE NORTHERN TIER FROM RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INCURSIONS. 

[Maj. Gen. Jonas Wikman, Chief of Staff of the Swedish Air Force]

We also add geography when it comes to to early warning. Early Warning capabilities. I mean, we cover from, I think, 55 to 69 degrees north. That’s, that’s kind of wide area for early warning. We bring in place geography when it comes to bases. We have air bases and we have space port north of the polar circle, and we know how to operate that.”

[Ryan Robertson]

AND IT’S THAT DIVERSITY OF DEFENSES, FROM THE NORTHERN PACIFIC TO THE NORTHERN ATLANTIC, THAT POTENTIALLY GIVES THE U.S. AND ITS ALLIES AN EDGE IN THE ARCTIC. WHERE RUSSIA AND CHINA GENERALLY OPERATE FROM A SINGLE SYSTEM, THEY, IN TURN, WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH FAR MORE THAN THAT.

[Scott Gilloon, Sr. Dir. Mission Architecture, General Atomics, aeronautical systems]

“Now, imagine an adversary having to approach it from, Hey, what is Saab system do? What are the maybe, if there’s, what is it? What is it that this system is going to look like to my to my screen, to my, you know, to the sensing apparatus, they have to approach it from all of us. And I think that’s very, very powerful, not only in terms of kind of the way we generate information or process information, but also the way that we can then attack the problem, because you can’t just get to one of us without bypassing the others, right? And so I think that, again, that that, to me, seems like a great way to collaborate, and just something that you know, again, being the retired guy, love to see kind of that expansion of NATO, bringing Sweden and Finland to the mix.”

[Ryan Robertson]

IF ALL OF THIS SOUNDS NEW TO YOU, THERE’S A REASON FOR THAT. THE ARCTIC HASN’T BEEN A MAJOR FOCUS FOR U.S. DEFENSE SPENDING IN THE PAST. THIS IS PROBABLY BECAUSE, EXCEPT FOR RUSSIA, MOST COUNTRIES WITH CLAIMS IN THE REGION WERE U.S. ALLIES. BEYOND THAT, CHINA ONLY STARTED DEVELOPING ITS ARCTIC STRATEGY IN THE LAST SIX YEARS. 

WHILE THERE’S NO DENYING THE GLOBAL POLITICS IN THE ARCTIC ARE SHIFTING, ESPECIALLY AS CLIMATE CHANGE IS MAKING THE WATERS EASIER TO NAVIGATE, IT MIGHT FEEL LIKE THE U.S. IS FALLING BEHIND IN ARCTIC POLICY, BUT THAT’S A PERCEPTION THAT COULD SOON BE CHANGING. ESPECIALLY AS, AT LEAST FOR NOW, NATO CONTINUES STRENGTHENING ITS DEFENSE PLANS IN THE REGION.