CMS increasing Medicaid oversight to prevent benefits for ‘noncitizens’


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

CMS to increase oversight

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced increased oversight to prevent states from using federal Medicaid funds for immigrants illegally in the U.S.

CMS to investigate

CMS will audit spending reports and state eligibility rules, warning that misused funds must be repaid.

State concerns

The move aligns with a Trump-era executive order and has prompted concerns from states like California.


Full story

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced Tuesday, May 27, that it is increasing federal financial oversight to ensure states are not using federal funds to provide full Medicaid benefits to people who are in the U.S. illegally. Medicaid is a government health insurance program for low-income individuals and families, jointly funded by the federal and state governments. 

Federal law prohibits Medicaid from covering people who are in the U.S. illegally, except in emergency situations.

“Medicaid is not, and cannot be, a backdoor pathway to subsidize open borders,” CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz said in a statement. “States have a duty to uphold the law and protect taxpayer funds. We are putting them on notice—CMS will not allow federal dollars to be diverted to cover those who are not lawfully eligible.”

Targeting improper spending

Drew Snyder, deputy administrator and director of CMS, sent a letter to some state governments, although it remains unclear which ones. In the letter, he explained that CMS will be taking a closer look at CMS-64 forms, which are reports that states regularly submit, showing how they are spending Medicaid funds.

The goal is to identify any suspicious or improper spending, particularly funds allocated to individuals who may not be eligible for the program. CMS will audit and investigate how states track and manage Medicaid money and will examine the rules that determine eligibility in each state.

Cracking down on loopholes

If CMS officials identify any loopholes that allow unauthorized immigrants to receive full Medicaid benefits, they will work to revise those rules and strengthen enforcement measures.

Currently, 14 states and Washington, D.C., offer some form of healthcare coverage for immigrant children, and about half that number offer it for adult immigrants.

California is one such state. As part of his budget plan, Gov. Gavin Newsom is asking the state legislature to reduce or eliminate some Medi-Cal coverage for immigrants illegally in the state to help control costs, KFF Health News reports.

Newsom warned that if the federal government reduces Medicaid funding, California may not have the funds to continue offering certain healthcare benefits, particularly for immigrants not authorized to be in the country. Officials may cut some of those benefits. He also argued that Congress might be overstepping its authority if it attempts to punish or restrict California for choosing to allocate its state funds to certain benefits.

States warned to ensure compliance

CMS is instructing all states to review and update their systems and procedures to ensure that Medicaid benefits are provided only to individuals who are legally eligible under federal law. If any state accidentally or improperly uses federal Medicaid funds for noncitizens who are not eligible, the federal government says it will demand that the money be returned. CMS stated this enforcement effort aligns with President Donald Trump’s executive order titled Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders.

Joey Nunez (Video Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' plan to strengthen oversight of Medicaid spending highlights ongoing debates over immigration policy, state versus federal control, and the safeguarding of taxpayer resources for federally defined eligible populations.

Federal oversight

Increased federal scrutiny aims to ensure that Medicaid funds are allocated according to federal law, particularly regarding eligibility and use of taxpayer dollars.

Immigration and healthcare policy

The CMS initiative addresses the contentious issue of health care provision for people without lawful immigration status and reflects broader national discussions about access to public benefits.

State-federal relations

CMS's enforcement efforts underscore tensions between states seeking to use their own funds for expanded health care coverage and federal mandates restricting the use of public money for non-eligible groups.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 14 media outlets

Context corner

Federal limits on benefits for non-citizens trace back to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, which established restrictions on public benefits for individuals without legal immigration status. This policy has shaped debates on health and welfare spending for decades and is regularly referenced as justification for federal Medicaid exclusion of immigrants illegally in the country.

Do the math

More than 71 million people are enrolled in Medicaid. According to government reports, over $16.2 billion was spent on Medicaid-funded emergency services for immigrants illegally in the U.S. in recent years. President Trump’s recent tax and spending bill penalizes states that use their own funds to extend Medicaid coverage beyond federally approved limits.

Policy impact

The policy to ramp up oversight may lead states to review their Medicaid eligibility processes more stringently, potentially limiting access to health care for non-citizens except in emergencies. States extending benefits beyond federal laws using their own funds could face federal penalties, affecting program funding and access for affected residents.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame increased Medicaid oversight as a concern over restricting immigrant healthcare access, subtly challenging policies that could harm vulnerable populations by using terms like “immigrant healthcare” and critiquing “crack down” language that suggests punitive measures.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize strict enforcement and taxpayer protection, deploying charged phrases such as “clamp down,” “illegal migrants,” and “beef up oversight,” which underscore a moral imperative to uphold immigration laws and prevent perceived abuses.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

14 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™