CNN deletes ‘tone deaf’ post about accused ISIS-inspired attackers in NYC


Full story

CNN has deleted a social media post that it says “failed to reflect the gravity” of an allegedly ISIS-inspired attack in New York City.

The alleged bombing attempt took place Saturday at a protest staged in front of Gracie Mansion, the official residence of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Two men, Emir Balat, 18, and Ibrahim Kayumi, 19, could be seen in videos dropping what was later described as an improvised explosive device at the feet of police and throwing another at anti-Muslim protesters.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The protest, called “Stop the Islamic Takeover of New York City,” organized by white supremacist Jake Lang, drew roughly 20 people, according to police and videos of the event.

Balat and Kayumi admitted to police that the attack was inspired by the terrorist group ISIS, according to a criminal complaint unsealed on Monday. 

They face charges of attempted provision of material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization, use of a weapon of mass destruction and three counts related to the possession and transportation of explosive material.

CNN’s Tuesday post to X led off with “Two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New York City Saturday morning for what could’ve been a normal day enjoying the city.”

“But in less than an hour,” the post read, “their lives would drastically change” after their arrests.

The post linked to a CNN story that took a straightforward approach to reporting the pair’s arrests, the protest and counterprotest and the potential devastation the explosive devices could have caused.

In a statement, CNN later said the post “failed to reflect the gravity of the incident, thereby breaching the editorial standards we require for all our reporting. It has therefore been deleted.”

Screen capture of the now-deleted social media post

The fallout

Reaction to the seemingly sympathetic framing of a terrorist-inspired attack came swiftly. 

Many criticized the description as “tone deaf” and said it was an example of media bias. Others used the post to resurrect an on-screen caption that CNN ran during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 describing demonstrations as “mostly peaceful” as the network’s correspondent stood in front of a large fire in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Others parodied CNN’s tone by using it to describe other infamous terror attacks.

“Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev – packed their backpacks for a fun day out at the Boston Marathon,” wrote Melissa Chen, vice president of the geopolitical intelligence firm Strategy Risks, in a reference to the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

CNN deleted a social media post about an ISIS-inspired bombing attempt after acknowledging it violated editorial standards by framing the suspects' actions in language critics described as sympathetic.

How news organizations frame terrorism

A major news outlet acknowledged its social media post failed to convey the seriousness of an alleged terrorist attack, drawing criticism for appearing to sympathize with suspects who admitted ISIS inspiration.

Public accountability for editorial choices

The network's decision to delete the post and issue a statement came after widespread criticism that the framing minimized the gravity of explosive devices deployed at a public protest.

Standards for covering extremist violence

The incident revived debate over how media outlets describe politically or ideologically motivated attacks, with critics citing the post as evidence of inconsistent editorial judgment.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

30 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.