College football expansion debate re-ignited by Big 12 commissioner


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Yormark “doubling down”

Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark is “doubling down” on his desire to see a “5-11” CFP model in 2026.

Expansion on docket

Yormark spoke at the Big 12 media day and said conference commissioners have until December to decide what format to use.

Big Ten, SEC at odds

The SEC and Big Ten have a different idea when it comes to how many automatic bids a conference should have.


Full story

Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark has re-ignited the debate over the expansion of the College Football Playoff and how it should be structured. He leaned into his preferred format choice just a few minutes into his opening address at the conference football media day event.

What format is the Big 12 proposing?

Yormark said, “5-11 is fair,” adding, “We want to earn it on the field. It might not be the best solution today for the Big 12, but long term, knowing the progress we’re making, the investments we’re making, it’s the right format for us. And I’m doubling down today on 5-11.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The term “5-11” refers to a format with five automatic bids for conference champions and 11 at-large bids, filling out what would be a 16-team playoff field starting with the 2026 season. The Big 12 and ACC are the two conferences proposing this format in an attempt to head off what the Big Ten and the SEC believe is the best solution.

The Big Ten and the SEC hold the most sway in expansion talks, and they want to see four automatic qualifiers earn bids from each of their leagues, along with two each from the Big 12 and the ACC. Adding Notre Dame as an automatic would leave just three at-large bids in that scenario.

The initial 12-team playoff kicked off in 2024 and ended four weeks later with the National Championship game between Ohio State and Notre Dame. Ohio State won the title, 34-23. The format featured four teams that earned first-round byes after winning their conference championships. All four teams lost their first matchups in the playoffs.

What do some of the coaches think about expansion?

During the Big 12 media interview sessions, Kansas State head coach Chris Klieman didn’t have an opinion on how the playoff should be set up going forward but brought up another expansion concern.

The wear and tear on the athletes is real,” Klieman said. “I don’t think we help that at all by knocking the roster size down. I don’t think that was a good move at all, but that’s control what you can control. So, that’s going to be a concern when you have fewer players playing that amount of games. But I’m excited about what I was able to watch last year of the playoff and the potential expansion here in another year.”

The Big 12 Conference had only one representative — league champion Arizona State — in the inaugural playoff last year. The Sun Devils lost to Texas in the quarterfinals in double overtime. Yormark said that reaching a point where several teams are in the discussion each year is how his conference can maximize whatever format the new playoff may take.

“I think parity matters, and I think ultimately over time, and it’s hopefully sooner than later, there’ll be a couple of our schools that will emerge as elite schools that are always part of the conversations at the highest levels, and that’s what we’re working towards,” Yormark said. “But it starts with parity and being competitive top to bottom. And I think we’re there.”

The conference opens play with a rivalry game on Saturday, August 23, between Kansas State and Iowa State in Dublin, Ireland.

What are the next steps in the expansion process?

Yormark believes the Big 12 is the “deepest conference in America” and said that in addition to schedule strength, “new metrics” will be added to the selection process to ensure fairness.

“I have a lot of faith in the selection process,” Yormark said. “They are doing a full audit to figure out how they can modernize and contemporize and how they use data and how certain metrics can be more heavily weighted.”

He also said he was confident conference commissioners will eventually settle on the 5-11 model. They have until December of this year to decide which 16-team format to adopt.

Joey Nunez (Video Editor), Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor), and Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Debate over the future format of the College Football Playoff reflects ongoing power dynamics and differing priorities among major conferences, potentially shaping the competitiveness and structure of college football for years to come.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 23 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The key numbers discussed involve the expansion of the College Football Playoff (CFP) from 12 to potentially 16 teams. The 5+11 model means five automatic bids to conference champions and eleven at-large spots. Financially, ESPN's $7.8 billion contract for the CFP starting in 2026 is a substantial driver behind conversations about structure and inclusion.

Context corner

The current debate emerges from recent shifts in college football's landscape, with conference realignment and expansion altering traditional power dynamics. The Big 12 has undergone major changes, adding former Pac-12 schools and losing Texas and Oklahoma. This context shapes Yormark’s emphasis on parity, competitiveness and resistance to a professional NFL-style model for college football.

Policy impact

Altering the CFP format will directly affect recruiting, revenue sharing, and national exposure for member schools. A shift to either the 5+11 or another model will determine which conferences reliably access playoff and associated financial benefits, reaffirming or disrupting existing hierarchies in college athletics.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frames Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark’s firm endorsement of the 5-11 College Football Playoff format with subtle skepticism, using the phrase “doubles down” to suggest stubbornness and highlighting opposition to the Big Ten’s “professional model,” characterized as a threat to college football’s amateur ethos.
  • Media outlets in the center adopt a more descriptive tone, emphasizing competitive balance and the Big 12’s strategic challenges post-Texas/Oklahoma departures while de-emphasizing ideological conflict.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets on the right to provide a bias comparison.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

23 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark is 'doubling down' on the 5-11 College Football Playoff model, which includes five automatic qualifiers and eleven at-large bids, in contrast to a 16-team proposal from the Big Ten.
  • The Big 12's 5-11 model assigns five bids to conference champions and eleven to at-large teams, countering a 16-team plan proposed by the Big Ten.
  • Yormark expressed confidence that the 5-11 model will be adopted for the 2026 season, despite acknowledging it might not currently benefit the Big 12 optimally.
  • He emphasized the importance of competitiveness in college football, stating, 'We do not need a professional model because we are not the NFL.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark reaffirmed his strong support for the 5-11 College Football Playoff expansion during Big 12 Media Days on Tuesday in Frisco, Texas.
  • Yormark emphasized that the conference must maintain its position in the Power Four and act like college football, not the NFL, to protect its unique identity and competitiveness.
  • He emphasized the league’s strong quarterback depth this season, noting that the Big 12 leads the Power Four conferences in returning starters at the position and anticipates securing multiple playoff spots.
  • Yormark emphasized that no conference matches their level of competitive parity and expressed strong belief that the 5-11 playoff format is equitable and represents the proper long-term approach.
  • He indicated that new revenue sharing and NIL regulation by the College Sports Commission will help the Big 12 close the gap with other conferences and foster elite programs.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.