The recent conclusion of former President Donald Trump’s criminal trial in New York has not quelled the surrounding controversy. The latest stir involves a Facebook comment claiming that a juror’s cousin had prior knowledge of Trump’s guilty verdict. Now, that comment’s credibility is in question after the Facebook user who allegedly penned the comment claims it was all a joke.
The controversy began with a letter from Judge Juan Merchan, acknowledging a contentious comment posted on the Unified Court System’s public Facebook page.
Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™
Point phone camera here
“My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted,” the comment, made by a user identified as Michael Anderson, said. “Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!”
Merchan’s letter, dated Friday, June 7, confirmed the existence of the comment but did not verify its content. The comment, reportedly a week old, appeared before the jury’s conviction of Trump and has since been deleted.
While Anderson claimed to be related to a juror, he later described the comment as a joke designed to provoke a strong reaction with minimal effort. This response, shared widely on social media, urged people to “take it easy.”
The reaction to the comment was swift and significant. Several Republicans, including Trump, called for a mistrial based on the potential juror misconduct implied by the comment. However, legal analysts have suggested that there is a “relatively small chance” that the comment reflects any true inside information.
Court officials told The Washington Post that they have a duty to inform all parties of such online content, regardless of its credibility. This protocol aims to ensure transparency and maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
![Russia Today [🇷🇺-affiliated] logo](https://groundnews.b-cdn.net/interests/d3a6b2444d4740f3e75a430e54a0cb4d24ee6cc6.jpg)
