Court blocks Trump’s use of Alien Enemies Act to deport migrants


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Legal challenge

A federal appeals court in New Orleans ruled that President Donald Trump's administration wrongly used the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport migrants.

Gang-related deportation

The Trump administration sought to fast-track the removal of suspected members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang by framing migration as an "invasion" and labeling the group a threat.

Supreme Court implications

The appeals court ruling sets the stage for a possible Supreme Court case on the extent of presidential emergency powers in immigration matters.


Full story

President Donald Trump faces a new legal setback for his immigration crackdown. A federal appeals court in New Orleans ruled the administration wrongly invoked a 200-year-old law to deport Venezuelan migrants.

Trump has framed migration as an “invasion.” Last spring, he turned to the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to fast-track the removal of suspected members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

However, the court ruled that the administration’s claims that the gang was part of a warlike invasion were false.

“Our analysis leads us to GRANT a preliminary injunction to prevent removal because we find no invasion or predatory incursion,” the panel’s majority wrote.

Trump administration’s previous efforts

The ruling comes months after the State Department designated Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization. In March, the White House said the gang was “conducting irregular warfare and undertaking hostile actions” against the U.S. that include “mass illegal migration.”

The latest ruling paves the way for a showdown at the U.S. Supreme Court over how far presidents can go in using emergency powers on immigration.

Trump scored a limited victory with the same court. It ruled that the administration’s seven-day notice of deportation did comply with a previous high court order.

The seven-day notice came after the Supreme Court halted the administration’s plans to deport alleged members of the gang with just 24 hours’ notice.

Tren de Aragua drug boat attack

On the same day as the ruling, Trump announced the U.S. conducted a military strike on board a drug boat connected to the Tren de Aragua gang.

Trump said the gang and the boat were operating under the control of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. He noted that 11 people were killed, but no Americans were injured in the operation.

Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal appeals court ruling limits the president's use of emergency powers for immigration enforcement, highlighting ongoing legal and political debates over the scope of executive authority in handling migration and alleged security threats.

Executive power limits

The court's decision clarifies legal boundaries on how presidential emergency powers can be applied, especially in immigration cases, which may influence future actions by current and future administrations.

Immigration policy

The ruling addresses the federal government's approach to expediting deportations and labels of organizations as security threats, affecting U.S. immigration enforcement and migrant rights.

Legal challenges

Ongoing court disputes demonstrate the contested nature of immigration policy, with Supreme Court involvement possible, affecting how broadly or narrowly executive authority can be interpreted in future cases.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left emphatically frame the appeals court ruling as a just rebuke of Trump’s “unlawful” invocation of a wartime statute during peacetime, highlighting immigrant rights gains and employing morally charged language like “rightly shut down.”
  • Media outlets in the center adopt a more measured tone, emphasizing historical context of the Alien Enemies Act and detailing contentious administration claims — such as deporting gang members to a “notorious prison” — without overt judgment.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets on the right to provide a bias comparison.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

110 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal appeals court ruled that President Donald Trump cannot use the Alien Enemies Act to expedite deportations of alleged Venezuelan gang members, blocking an administration initiative.
  • The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, sided with immigrant rights lawyers and lower court judges who contested the law's application to gangs.
  • Lee Gelernt of the ACLU stated, "The Trump administration’s use of a wartime statute during peacetime to regulate immigration was rightly shut down by the court."
  • The ruling can be appealed to the full 5th Circuit or the U.S. Supreme Court for the final decision on the issue.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Tuesday, a group of three judges from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decided that President Trump is not permitted to invoke the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to accelerate the deportation of suspected members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
  • This ruling followed the Trump administration's invocation of the wartime statute in March to target Tren de Aragua members, claiming gang ties justified emergency deportations despite peacetime conditions.
  • The administration sent individuals identified as members of the Tren de Aragua group to a well-known prison in El Salvador and maintained that U.S. courts lacked authority to intervene in their release, a position the court criticized for circumventing due process.
  • Lee Gelernt of the ACLU, who represented the case, stated that the court appropriately blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to apply a wartime law in a period without war to control immigration, underscoring the significance of the ruling.
  • The ruling reined in the administration's view that it could declare emergencies without court oversight and is likely to face appeals at the full 5th Circuit or the U.S. Supreme Court for a final decision.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.