DC’s attorney general sues Trump admin. over ‘unlawful’ police takeover


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Trump administration sued

Washington, D.C., Attorney General Brian Schwalb sued the Trump administration, alleging violations of the D.C. Home Rule Act and the Constitution.

Attorney general critical of takeover

The district’s top lawyer previously criticized the Trump administration’s takeover of Washington’s police department, calling it "unlawful."

No response from defendants

President Donald Trump, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and other defendants have not responded to the lawsuit.


Full story

The District of Columbia regained some control of its police department late Friday, hours after suing the Trump administration for its “unlawful” takeover. Following a court order, the district and federal government agreed that the city’s police chief — not an “emergency” commander appointed by the administration — would command the department. 

Both sides also agreed, however, that D.C. police officers would increase cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, a policy change U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi instituted late Thursday.

D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb announced the lawsuit on Facebook, saying the takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department compromised residents’ safety and violated the Home Rule Act, which granted district voters the right to elect a mayor and city council.

“We are going to court to defend Home Rule, block these orders, and maintain MPD under District control,” Schwalb wrote. “This is the gravest threat to Home Rule DC has faced, and we are fighting to stop it.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Judge conducts hearing

U.S. District Court Judge Ana Reyes conducted a hearing on Friday afternoon on Schwalb’s request for a temporary restraining order. She adjourned the hearing around 5 p.m. Eastern time, requesting the parties to present evidence before entering a ruling.

“I do think that section one of the order is plainly contrary to the statute,” Reyes said in the hearing, referring to Bondi’s order. “Not going to reach the constitutional issue, but I don’t want to issue a decision unless I have to.”

Reyes didn’t. Instead, Justice Department attorney Yaakov Roth said the Trump administration agreed to change Bondi’s order, The Washington Post reported. It would state Drug Enforcement Administrator Terrance Cole is the “designee of the attorney general for the purposes of requesting services,” Roth told the judge.

If the order isn’t changed by 6:30 p.m., Reyes would block that section of Bondi’s order.

The suit names President Donald Trump, Bondi, Cole, U.S. Marshals Service Director Gadyaces Serralta and their respective agencies as defendants. 

The lawsuit comes nearly five days after Trump federalized the Washington police to “take our capital back.” Trump claimed that crime is rising in the district, even though the Justice Department and MPD said in January that the city’s violent crime rate in 2024 was the lowest in 30 years.

The lawsuit revealed that Bondi issued an order on Thursday evening, unbeknownst to the city’s police, that directed Mayor Muriel Bowser and Police Chief Pamela Smith to:

  • Eliminate the department’s sanctuary city policy.
  • Install Cole as the “emergency” police commissioner.
  • Reverse MPD’s orders that limited inquiries on a person’s immigration status and prevented arrests for federal immigration warrants.
  • Enforce a city law that made it illegal for people to continue demonstrations when it’s been previously declared unlawful or when they were told to disperse.

According to court papers, Schwalb sought to repeal Bondi’s order that extended control of MPD, prevent the administration from further action on MPD and declare that Trump’s executive orders violated the Home Rule Act and the Constitution. 

“These unlawful assertions of authority will create immediate, devastating, and irreparable harms for the District,” attorneys wrote in the lawsuit. “Most critically, the order threatens to upend the command structure of MPD and wreak operational havoc within the department, endangering the safety of the public and law enforcement officers alike.”

Schwalb’s office didn’t immediately respond to Straight Arrow News’ request for comment. None of the agencies has commented on the litigation.

This is a developing story.

Mathew Grisham (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The legal battle over federal control of Washington, D.C.'s police department highlights a dispute over the limits of presidential authority and the governance of the U.S. capital, raising questions about emergency powers and local autonomy.

Federal versus local authority

This theme is central as District of Columbia officials and the Trump administration dispute whether the president can assume operational control over the city's police force, reflecting unresolved questions about local self-governance and federal oversight.

Impact on civil governance

The shift in police command structure and suspension of sanctuary city policies may directly affect public safety operations, day-to-day law enforcement, and the rights and expectations of D.C. residents regarding their city's governance.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 87 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Local officials and federal agencies cite different figures on crime rates in Washington, D.C. while Attorney General Brian Schwalb says violent crime has dropped by 26% since 2024.

Community reaction

According to articles from left-leaning and center sources, many D.C. community members and leaders express concern and opposition, with local officials emphasizing the importance of home rule and public safety, while protests and tension have arisen in busy city areas due to heightened federal presence.

Quote bank

"By declaring a hostile takeover of MPD the Administration is abusing its limited temporary authority… and putting the safety of DC residents and visitors at risk" — Attorney General Brian Schwalb. “There is no statute that conveys the District’s personnel authority to a federal official” — Mayor Muriel Bowser.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

202 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The District of Columbia challenged President Donald Trump's control over its police department in court, claiming it exceeded his legal authority.
  • Attorney General Brian Schwalb stated that Trump's actions insult the dignity of D.C. Residents and threaten their safety.
  • Schwalb's lawsuit demands that control of the police department remain with local authorities.
  • Schwalb's office argued that Trump's actions infringe on self-governance and could risk safety for residents and visitors.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Friday, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb initiated legal action against the Trump administration in response to its federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department and the installation of DEA chief Terry Cole as the emergency police commissioner.
  • This legal action came after Attorney General Pam Bondi's Thursday order gave Cole full control of MPD, required ending sanctuary city policies, and mandated MPD approval from Cole for all directives amid a declared crime emergency.
  • Schwalb and Mayor Muriel Bowser argued the takeover violates the Home Rule Act by exceeding the president's authority to remove police leadership or control local enforcement priorities, undermining local self-governance.
  • Schwalb informed Chief Smith that the Bondi directive lacks legal authority and does not compel compliance, while Bowser emphasized that no law grants a federal official control over the District's personnel decisions.
  • The lawsuit reflects strong city resistance to the federal intervention as 800 National Guard troops began missions in the capital, with Trump's takeover authority limited to 30 days before congressional review is required.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump's police takeover efforts, calling them illegal and an infringement on self-governance rights.
  • Schwalb argued that the order stripping authority from D.C. Police Chief Pamela Smith was unlawful and does not permit the federal government to control local policing.
  • Schwalb labeled the federalization as 'the gravest threat to Home Rule' D.C. Has faced and emphasized the need to block Trump's actions.
  • The lawsuit claims Trump's statements about crime are 'hyperbolic and inconsistent with the facts' based on available data.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.