Delta and United accused of giving flyers ‘windowless’ window seats


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Window seat lawsuits

Delta Air Lines and United Airlines are facing class-action lawsuits.

Alleged misleading practices

According to the lawsuits, Delta and United allegedly upcharged for seats claimed to be window seats even though these seats were next to a blank wall.

Plaintiffs’ goals

The lawsuits seek to recover the value of extra money or benefits paid by passengers for window seats that lacked a window.


Full story

Delta Air Lines and United Airlines each face a class-action lawsuit where passengers accuse them of charging more for window seats that didn’t have any windows. Law firm Greenbaum Olbrantz filed both suits in federal courts in New York and California.

“We have received a flood of interest from passengers who feel they have been harmed by this practice and who wish to join the lawsuits,” Casey Olbrantz, founding partner with Greenbaum Olbrantz, told Straight Arrow News. “It makes sense that people are upset. The majority of Americans fly on one of these airlines at some point and a large proportion of them want or need a window, and they pay good money for the privilege.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Delta lawsuit

The lawsuit against Delta accuses them of up-charging for window seats but are actually next to a blank wall.

“Plaintiff and the proposed class members paid valuable additional consideration to obtain a window to improve their flying experiences,” the lawsuit reads. “Delta indicated to the Plaintiff and class members that the particular seats they chose had a ‘window,’ even though Delta knew full well they did not.”

The lawsuit accuses Delta of this practice for several years. The court documents include several images of seats without a window compared to the offering on the Delta website.

“Inexplicably, however, Delta declines to disclose the presence of Windowless Seats,” the complaint reads. “Instead, it charges a premium for them, and routinely declines to refund passengers.”

The suit also cites Reddit and X as having numerous complaints about the issue, and claims other airlines like Alaska and American disclose rows that do not have windows.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs argue this is a breach of contract with customers.

Delta has not responded to Straight Arrow News’ request for comment.

United lawsuit

The lawsuit against United is very similar to the one against Delta.

“For many years, United has knowingly and routinely sold windowless ‘window’ seats to consumers,” the complaint reads.

Much like the Delta suit, these documents also have pictures of the windowless seats next to an image of the same seat on the United website.

The suit also cites several airline responses to customers on social media where the airline said “we never guaranteed you will get a window.”

The suit also included screen grabs of customer complaints on social media.

When asked about the lawsuit, United told Straight Arrow News they do not comment on pending litigation.

“The lawsuits seek to recover the value of the extra money or benefits that all passengers paid to United or Delta for the purpose of ‘upgrading’ to a window seat that was actually windowless,” Olbrantz said. “Discovery will reveal the precise numbers, but we estimate that the overall number of affected passengers is in the millions.”

Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don't just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Passengers have filed lawsuits against Delta Air Lines and United Airlines alleging that they were charged extra for window seats that did not have windows, raising questions about airline booking practices and consumer transparency.

Consumer rights

The lawsuits highlight concerns over whether airlines are providing accurate information and fair value to customers who pay extra for specific seat features.

Transparency in advertising

Allegations that airlines marketed windowless seats as window seats prompt scrutiny of how clearly companies disclose product details and any limitations to customers.

Legal accountability

The legal actions may set precedents for how airlines and other industries represent products and address customer complaints about misleading practices.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don't just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

36 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • United Airlines and Delta Air Lines face a potential federal lawsuit for allegedly misleading customers about window seats that lack actual windows, according to the Go Law firm.
  • Passengers are claiming this practice may violate their rights and could be considered false advertising, seeking compensation.
  • The law firm encourages California residents to join the lawsuit, with plans to file in the Northern District of California soon.
  • Attorney Casey Olbrantz stated they are holding United and Delta accountable for misleading practices that could be easily fixed.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Go Law Firm intends to file federal lawsuits around August 2025 against United and Delta Airlines, alleging they sold window seats without actual windows, with the cases expected to be filed in a California federal court.
  • Passengers paid extra fees, sometimes between $15 and $100, for window seats that due to aircraft design lack a window, prompting claims of misleading business practices and false advertising.
  • This issue is not new; Alaska Airlines explained in 2019 that certain Boeing 737 seats sit beside cabin walls housing air ducts, preventing window installation and leaving passengers facing blank walls.
  • Attorney Casey Olbrantz stated that they aim to challenge United and Delta over deceptive business practices that can be corrected quickly, while plaintiffs are pursuing compensation and the possibility of class action litigation.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™