Despite court orders, Trump says he won’t pay SNAP benefits during shutdown


Summary

SNAP funding threats

President Donald Trump threatened to withhold Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits until after the government shutdown has ended.

Court interventions

Courts in Rhode Island and Massachusetts ordered the administration to fund SNAP, compelling officials to consider using contingency and tariff revenues to pay benefits for November.

Nonprofit legal actions

Nonprofit organizations refiled cases in federal court seeking full and prompt distribution of November SNAP benefits. However, this was before Trump's social post.


Full story

Despite his administration saying it would comply with court orders, President Donald Trump is threatening to withhold SNAP benefits. He said the government would fund the food assistance program only when “the Radical Left Democrats open up government.”

The president’s threat comes after the administration agreed on Monday to two court orders requiring the government to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. The administration said it would partially fund the program using emergency funds previously approved by Congress. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Trump’s post on Truth Social seems to defy the two court orders. The White House has yet to comment on the president’s post.

In his post, Trump claimed the number of SNAP beneficiaries increased under former President Joe Biden, saying he “haphazardly” gave out benefits to anyone who asked instead of those who actually needed them. He did not elaborate on that accusation. 

What did the administration previously say?

On Monday, the administration said it would use the nearly $5 billion in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s contingency funds to partially fund the program for November. The administration did not say who would receive benefits in November or how much they would disperse per person. 

The court orders, issued in Rhode Island and Massachusetts, required the administration to fully fund the program. The judges said USDA officials would need to decide whether to tap into $17 billion in tariff revenue to pay for the rest of November’s benefits.

Lawyers who filed the cases against the administration stated that partial funding would be insufficient. They argued that recipients would receive only about half of the benefits they typically receive if the government funded it partially.

What happens next?

Before Trump posted, nonprofits had refiled in federal court, hoping to get a better answer from the courts and possibly force the Trump administration to pay benefits quickly and in full. 

The groups claimed the court had not anticipated that millions of people could be left without food assistance for several weeks. Consequently, they requested that the judge order the administration to “release the unlawfully withheld funding, in its entirety, for November SNAP benefits.”

A federal court has scheduled a hearing on Thursday for those groups. The hearing was scheduled before Trump threatened to deny the benefits entirely.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The potential withholding of SNAP benefits linked to a political dispute and ongoing legal proceedings highlights concerns about food security for millions and the intersection of governmental actions, judicial mandates, and public welfare.

SNAP benefits and food security

Delays or reductions in SNAP benefits could immediately affect millions of people who rely on this program for basic food assistance, raising concerns about hunger and stability for vulnerable communities.

Judicial intervention

Federal court orders have required the government to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, emphasizing the role of the judiciary in checking executive actions and protecting public welfare.

Political strategy

President Donald Trump's statements link essential services to broader political standoffs, illustrating how government functions and social programs can become leveraged in wider partisan disputes.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.