DNI Tulsi Gabbard making 3 criminal referrals to DOJ for alleged leaking


Summary

Criminal referrals made

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has sent two criminal referrals to the Department of Justice regarding an alleged leak of classified information, with a third on the way.

Leaked information allegations

Gabbard claimed that the leaks to the media were meant to undermine President Trump’s agenda and posed risks to national security.

Pentagon firings linked

The criminal referrals coincide with the firing of senior advisers by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth amid an ongoing leak investigation.

Defense officials' response

Fired officials claimed they were not informed of the reasons for their terminations and defended their service in a joint statement.


Summary

Criminal referrals made

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has sent two criminal referrals to the Department of Justice regarding an alleged leak of classified information, with a third on the way.

Leaked information allegations

Gabbard claimed that the leaks to the media were meant to undermine President Trump’s agenda and posed risks to national security.

Pentagon firings linked

The criminal referrals coincide with the firing of senior advisers by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth amid an ongoing leak investigation.

Defense officials' response

Fired officials claimed they were not informed of the reasons for their terminations and defended their service in a joint statement.


Full story

Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard sent two criminal referrals to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for an alleged leak of classified information. There is also a third referral “on its way.” 

What is Gabbard saying?

Gabbard said in a statement that there was a recent illegal leak to The Washington Post, and that classified intel was leaked for “partisan political purposes” to undermine President Trump’s agenda. 

“Politicization of our intelligence and leaking classified information puts our nation’s security at risk and must end,” Gabbard announced. “Those who leak classified information will be found and held accountable to the fullest extent of the law.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Gabbard did not specify who she was accusing of leaking or what information was disclosed. She said last month that she would be aggressively pursuing leakers. 

Is this connected to Pentagon investigations?

Gabbard’s announcement comes a few days after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth fired some of his top advisers amidst an ongoing leak investigation.

Senior adviser Dan Caldwell, Deputy Chief of Staff Darin Selnick and Deputy Secretary Chief of Staff Colin Carroll were all fired. Hegseth’s Chief of Staff Joe Kasper changed roles. 

Hegseth said in an interview on “Fox and Friends” that if the investigation discovers any of them leaked, they will be referred to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution. 

“In this point, those folks who are leaking, who have been pushed out of the building, are now attempting to leak and sabotage the president’s agenda and what we’re doing. And that’s unfortunate,” Hegseth said. 

What did the fired officials say in their defense?

In a joint statement, the three fired officials said they still hadn’t been told what they were being investigated for or if there was a leak investigation. 

“We are incredibly disappointed by the manner in which our service at the Department of Defense ended. Unnamed Pentagon officials have slandered our character with baseless attacks on our way out the door,” they said in a joint statement.  

“All three of us served our country honorably in uniform – for two of us, this included deployments to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And, based on our collective service, we understand the importance of information security and worked every day to protect it,” the statement said. 

Criminal referrals are made to the Justice Department by federal officials and members of Congress. The department has no obligation to take action.

Snorre Wik (Photographer/Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

Why this story matters

This story is significant as it highlights the ongoing issues of classified information leaks and accountability within high-level government agencies.

Accountability

Accountability for leaking classified information is crucial to maintaining trust in governmental institutions and safeguarding national security.

Political Implications

Political motivations behind leaks or investigations can exacerbate divisions in governance and impact policy implementation.

Free speech and press

The story highlights how the new administration is taking a hard line against federal employees speaking with journalists, with many civil servants now hesitant to speak on the record.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 30 media outlets

Do the math

The exact costs mentioned are not specified in the documents, but if convicted, individuals implicated in leaks could face penalties of up to 10 years, stressing the serious implications of leaking classified information.

Policy impact

Gabbard’s policies intend to enforce strong repercussions for leaks. This could deter future disclosures, potentially limiting transparency within the intelligence community, while also challenging traditional protections for whistleblowers currently in place to encourage oversight of governmental operations.

Underreported

The potential collateral effects on whistleblower protections amidst the crackdown on leaks are not widely addressed. The focus remains largely on the accountability of the alleged leakers without discussing how this may chill future whistleblowing within the intelligence community.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

33 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™