
DOJ accuses Visa of monopolizing debit card market in new antitrust lawsuit
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor/Reporter), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor)
This report was created with support from enhanced software.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed an antitrust lawsuit against Visa. In the suit, it accused the company of monopolizing the debit card market through anticompetitive practices. The government claimed these actions have potentially cost consumers and businesses billions of dollars.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said that Visa controls over 60% of U.S. debit transactions. He said the alleged monopoly allowed the company to charge $7 billion annually in processing fees.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The DOJ alleged that Visa abused its dominant position for over a decade by forcing businesses to use its network and blocking new alternatives from entering the market.
“We alleged that to maintain this monopoly power, Visa deploys a web of unlawful and anticompetitive agreements to penalize merchants and banks for using competing payment networks,” Garland said. “At the same time, it coerces would-be market entrants into unlawful agreements not to compete by threatening high fees if they do not cooperate and promising big payoffs if they do. The result is a debit market where Visa has unlawfully amassed the power to extract fees that far exceed what it could charge in a competitive market. Merchants and banks pass those costs to consumers.”
The DOJ’s lawsuit reveals a range of alleged anticompetitive practices employed by Visa to maintain its market dominance.
Visa allegedly penalizes merchants and banks that opt for alternative payment processing technologies and imposes volume commitments on merchants, banks and financial institutions that issue debit cards. It also reportedly offers monetary incentives to potential competitors to become partners instead of rivals.
The DOJ argued that Visa’s practices inflated prices across a wide range of goods and services. Additionally, it argued Visa stifled competition through exclusivity agreements.
As a consequence, consumers may face higher prices or reduced quality of goods and services as businesses attempt to offset Visa’s fees.
Visa has not yet commented on the lawsuit.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FILED AN ANTITRUST LAWSUIT AGAINST VISA, ACCUSING THE COMPANY OF MONOPOLIZING THE DEBIT CARD MARKET THROUGH ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES. THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS THE COMPANY’S ACTIONS HAVE POTENTIALLY COST CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
US ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND SAYS VISA CONTROLS OVER 60% OF U.S. DEBIT TRANSACTIONS, ALLOWING IT TO CHARGE $7 BILLION ANNUALLY IN PROCESSING FEES.
THE DOJ ALLEGES THAT VISA HAS ABUSED ITS DOMINANT POSITION FOR OVER A DECADE BY FORCING BUSINESSES TO USE ITS NETWORK AND BLOCKING NEW ALTERNATIVES FROM ENTERING THE MARKET.
“WE ALLEGED THAT TO MAINTAIN THIS MONOPOLY POWER, VISA DEPLOYS A WEB OF UNLAWFUL AND ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS TO PENALIZE MERCHANTS AND BANKS FOR USING COMPETING PAYMENT NETWORKS,” GARLAND SAID. AT THE SAME TIME, IT COERCES WOULD BE MARKET ENTRANCE INTO UNLAWFUL AGREEMENTS NOT TO COMPETE BY THREATENING HIGH FEES IF THEY DO NOT COOPERATE AND PROMISING BIG PAYOFFS IF THEY DO. THE RESULT IS A DEBIT MARKET WHERE VISA HAS UNLAWFULLY AMASSED THE POWER TO EXTRACT FEES THAT FAR EXCEED WHAT IT COULD CHARGE IN A COMPETITIVE MARKET. MERCHANTS AND BANKS PASS THOSE COSTS TO CONSUMERS.”
THE DOJ’S LAWSUIT REVEALS A RANGE OF ALLEGED ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES EMPLOYED BY VISA TO MAINTAIN ITS MARKET DOMINANCE.
VISA ALLEGEDLY PENALIZES MERCHANTS AND BANKS WHO OPT FOR ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES, IMPOSES VOLUME COMMITMENTS ON MERCHANTS, BANKS, AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THAT ISSUE DEBIT CARDS, AND REPORTEDLY OFFERS MONETARY INCENTIVES TO POTENTIAL COMPETITORS TO BECOME PARTNERS INSTEAD OF RIVALS.
THE DOJ ARGUES THAT VISA’S PRACTICES HAVE INFLATED PRICES ACROSS A WIDE RANGE OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND STIFLED COMPETITION THROUGH EXCLUSIVITY AGREEMENTS.
AND AS A CONSEQUENCE, CONSUMERS MAY FACE HIGHER PRICES OR REDUCED QUALITY OF GOODS AND SERVICES AS BUSINESS ATTEMPT TO OFFSET VISA’S FEES.
VISA HAS YET TO COMMENT ON THE LAWSUIT.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M LAUREN TAYLOR.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
How does dyeing the Chicago River on St. Patrick’s Day impact fish?
Watch 1:599 hrs ago -
Getty Images
March Madness costs US economy $20 billion in lost productivity
ReadYesterday -
Reuters
Judge threatened with impeachment after blocking Trump deportation plan
ReadYesterday -
AP Images
Astronauts arrive at ISS
ReadYesterday