DOJ admits full grand jury did not review final indictment against James Comey


Summary

Grand jury process

The Department of Justice admitted that the grand jury that charged FBI Director James Comey did not review the final indictment.

Defense arguments

Comey’s attorney argued in court that, given the limited grand jury involvement, “no indictment was returned.” He further claimed that the statute of limitations had expired on Comey for the charge of lying to Congress.

DOJ charges against Comey

The DOJ charged Comey with making false statements to Congress and obstruction of justice. He has pleaded not guilty.


Full story

The Department of Justice admitted Wednesday that the grand jury that charged former FBI Director James Comey did not review the final indictment. Lindsey Halligan, the U.S. attorney leading the case, said only the foreperson and another grand juror saw the document. 

The admission came as Comey asked a judge to dismiss the indictment, saying his prosecution is vindictive. Halligan sought Comey’s indictment after President Donald Trump forced previous U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert out after he refused to bring cases against Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Before taking the role, Halligan had no experience as a prosecutor.

What was said in court?

A judge previously raised concerns over the grand jury’s indictment. The judge said he could find no record in a grand jury transcript that the jurors reviewed the indictment that the DOJ presented against Comey.

Halligan admitted under questioning that only the grand jury foreperson and a second grand juror were present for the return of the indictment. 

Prosecutors said that instead of presenting a new indictment to the grand jury after it declined to approve one of the counts, Halligan brought an altered version for the foreperson to sign. 

Comey’s attorney argued that given this testimony, “no indictment was returned.” He also said the statute of limitations had expired on Comey for the charge of lying to Congress. 

The judge ordered the DOJ to address Halligan’s admission that she did not present the full grand jury with the final version of the indictment for approval. The department has until 5 p.m. ET Wednesday to respond. 

Before the hearing ended, the judge said he would not make a ruling on Wednesday since the issues are “too weighty and too complex.”

What is Comey charged with?

The DOJ charged Comey with making false statements to Congress and obstruction of justice. He has pleaded not guilty. 

The charges stem from a 2020 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. During the hearing, Comey testified about his handling of a case involving Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server and an investigation into the allegations that Russia interfered in the 2020 presidential election to help Trump.

Prosecutors allege he misled the Senate by saying he didn’t authorize a leak to the media about an FBI investigation. 

The indictment did not specify what statement was allegedly a lie. However, one key exchange was between Comey and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. Cruz asked Comey about testimony he gave in 2017 denying he was the source for stories about investigations into Trump or Clinton.

Some have said that was false, as former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe said Comey authorized him to leak information to the media.

Alan Judd contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The handling of the indictment against former FBI Director James Comey raises questions about legal procedures, prosecutorial conduct and the politicization of high-profile investigations involving former government officials.

Grand jury process

Allegations that the full grand jury did not review the final indictment document highlight concerns about adherence to proper legal processes and the integrity of criminal proceedings.

Prosecutorial conduct

Questions about the experience and actions of the U.S. attorney leading the case, as well as the circumstances under which the charges were pursued, underscore ongoing debates over prosecutorial responsibilities and impartiality.

Political influence in legal cases

Claims that the case was brought after external political intervention, and debates about whether the prosecution is vindictive, raise broader issues about the intersection of politics and justice in the United States.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 38 media outlets

Community reaction

Legal experts cited in coverage express concern over grand jury procedures and the lack of prosecutorial experience, while some commentators view the situation as reflecting broader debates over politicization of the justice system.

Context corner

Comey's prosecution follows his 2017 firing while overseeing an FBI investigation into potential ties between President Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia and has since been at the center of ongoing public and legal disputes.

Do the math

Court transcripts reveal that 12 out of 23 grand jurors need to agree for an indictment, and that the prosecutor secured the disputed indictment three days after taking office as the statute of limitations approached expiration.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame this as "botched paperwork" and "apparent lapses," emphasizing a judge who "grills" the government, questioning if Comey was "properly indicted" with a critical, accusatory tone.
  • Media outlets in the center maintain a neutral tone, stating the facts directly, though one instance attributes the admission to "Trump's DOJ," implying specific administration responsibility.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets on the right to provide a bias comparison.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

93 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Justice Department announced that the grand jury did not review the final indictment against James Comey, as acknowledged during a court session on Wednesday.
  • Comey's lawyers argue that the case is politically motivated and seek dismissal due to vindictive prosecution linked to President Donald Trump's animosity.
  • Comey has pleaded not guilty to charges of making a false statements to Congress.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Wednesday, the Justice Department acknowledged the grand jury that charged James Comey was not shown the final indictment, and prosecutors admitted this lapse under court questioning.
  • Michael Dreeben told the court that Comey's lawyers argue the prosecution is rooted in President Donald Trump's hatred and public demands urging Attorney General Pam Bondi to act.
  • U.S. Magistrate William Fitzpatrick criticized the case as a "disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps" and noted Justice Department misstatements to the grand jury; James Comey has pleaded not guilty to charges of false statement and obstructing Congress.
  • Multiple legal challenges now seek dismissal of the indictment, and the Justice Department denies the prosecution was vindictive, insisting the allegations support the indictment.
  • The rapid appointment and quick filing of charges, coming as the statute of limitations neared, involved Lindsey Halligan, a White House aide and interim U.S. attorney, who secured an indictment days later despite no prior prosecutorial experience.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Lindsey Halligan, the interim U.S. attorney, admitted that the full grand jury never reviewed the final version of the charges against James Comey, who is facing indictment for providing false statements to Congress and obstruction of justice.
  • Another prosecutor, Tyler Lemons, stated that the changes made to the indictment were minor and did not constitute a new indictment, as the grand jurors did not see the two-count version.
  • Defense attorney Michael Dreeben requested the case against Comey be dismissed, claiming the indictment was not properly secured before the statute of limitations expired on September 30, 2020.
  • Comey is scheduled for trial on Jan. 5, 2026, and has sought to have the case dismissed over claims of vindictive prosecution and improper appointment of Halligan.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.