DOJ sues Gavin Newsom, California Democrats to stop Proposition 50 redistricting


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Map uses Hispanics as a measure

Republican plaintiffs and the Department of Justice claimed California’s new congressional map used Hispanic residents as a way for determining how boundaries will be drawn.

Newsom's office: Challengers are 'losers'

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s press office called challengers “losers” and said they would lose in court.

Hearing set

A three-judge panel set a hearing on the Justice Department’s preliminary injunction for Dec. 5, nearly two weeks before candidates can seek inclusion on the primary ballot.


Full story

The Justice Department joined a lawsuit against California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, in an effort to block the use of new congressional maps that give Democrats an advantage in the 2026 midterms. California redrew its congressional districts to favor Democrats after President Donald Trump started a nationwide redistricting frenzy to secure Republican wins in the election.

DOJ attorneys intervened in a lawsuit Thursday that California Republicans filed last week to block the implementation of Proposition 50.  State Republicans and the DOJ claim the new map — a response to Texas’ high-profile redistricting — unfairly uses race as a factor. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“In the press, California’s legislators and governor sold a plan to promote the interests of Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections,” U.S. attorneys wrote in court papers. “But amongst themselves and on the debate floor, the focus was not partisanship, but race.”

The new map would likely reduce Republican representation in Congress. It would remain in use until after the 2030 Census, after which the California Citizens Redistricting Commission would draw new boundaries. The independent commission was created following a 2008 referendum.

“Newsom should be concerned about keeping Californians safe and shutting down Antifa violence, not rigging his state for political gain,” Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X Thursday.

According to unofficial results from the California Secretary of State, 7.3 million people voted in favor of the ballot measure, while 4 million voted against it. 

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

More than 7.3 million Californians voted in favor of Proposition 50, a ballot measure to redraw the state’s congressional map in Democrats’ favor.

The Justice Department’s move follows Trump saying in the summer that he’s urged Republican-controlled states to redraw congressional boundaries to create party strongholds throughout the country.

Corrin Rankin, chairwoman of the California Republicans, supported the Justice Department’s move on X. She said Proposition 50 “sorted Californians by race to lock in political power.” 

Newsom’s press office wrote on X that “these losers lost at the ballot box and soon they will also lose in court.”

Justice Department joins lawsuit

According to court records, the Justice Department echoed California Republicans’ claim that the new map, which state Democrats designed to only be used in the 2026 election, illegally used race as a factor to favor Hispanic voters. 

“Race cannot be used as a proxy to advance political interests, but that is precisely what the California General Assembly did with Prop 50,” Jesus Osete, an assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, said in a release, erroneously classifying the California State Legislature as a General Assembly. 

Attorneys later wrote in court papers that map drawer Paul Mitchell, of Sacramento-based Redistricting Partners, created a new “majority/minority Latino district.” They said that the new map bolsters Hispanic Californians’ voting power because of their race. 

They added that California voters passed a measure requiring that an independent citizen-driven redistricting commission would redraw congressional boundaries following the decennial census. It last drew a map in 2021, which was used in the 2022 and 2024 elections. 

A court hearing is set for Dec. 5 on the Justice Department’s request for a preliminary injunction. According to the California Secretary of State, candidates seeking inclusion on the June 2 primary ballot can start gathering signatures on Dec. 19. 

Alan Judd and Cassandra Buchman contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Legal and political challenges to California's new congressional redistricting could impact election outcomes and voting rights, raising questions about the use of race in drawing electoral boundaries for the coming midterms.

Redistricting and elections

Changes to congressional maps can shift political representation, influencing which party holds more power in future elections and affecting how communities are represented.

Race and voting rights

Allegations that race was used as a major factor in redrawing districts highlight ongoing debates over equal representation and compliance with federal laws governing electoral fairness.

Legal and political disputes

The involvement of the Justice Department and lawsuits from multiple parties illustrate the contentious legal and political environment surrounding redistricting and election laws.

Get the big picture

Community reaction

Many Democratic leaders and urban communities in California supported Proposition 50 as a way to counter Republican redistricting tactics in other states, while rural and conservative communities strongly opposed it, alleging undermining of fair representation.

Diverging views

Left-leaning articles often characterize Proposition 50 as a justified response to Republican gerrymandering and emphasize its democratic legitimacy through the ballot. Right-leaning articles stress accusations of a 'power grab' and racial gerrymandering, framing the measure as unlawful or illegitimate.

History lesson

Mid-decade redistricting is rare but not unprecedented in US political history. Legal precedent limits federal recourse for partisan gerrymandering, though race-based claims are still reviewed—recent Supreme Court cases have made proving racial predominance more difficult.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Justice Department's lawsuit as a "Trump Justice Department" partisan obstruction, a "last-ditch" effort to stop California from giving Democrats more House seats, even using "pot calls kettle black" rhetoric.
  • Media outlets in the center neutrally reports the lawsuit and allegations.
  • Media outlets on the right portray California's redistricting as a "brazen power grab" and "racial gerrymander" that "tramples on civil rights," highlighting the aim to capture five U.S. House seats.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

274 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Justice Department sued to block California's new congressional map approved by voters, which aims to help Democrats win five seats in the 2026 elections.
  • The lawsuit accuses California of racial gerrymandering, claiming the map favors Hispanic voters based on race, which violates the Constitution.
  • California Gov. Gavin Newsom's Proposition 50 allows Democrats to alter district boundaries, which Republicans claim is a political power grab.
  • The lawsuit, supported by the California Republican Party, is part of a broader national redistricting battle influenced by President Donald Trump.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Nov. 13, the United States Department of Justice filed to intervene in federal court to join the California Republican Party's challenge to Prop 50 and asked a judge to block the new congressional map's use.
  • Last week, California voters approved Proposition 50 by over 7.3 million yes votes, a measure backed by more than $171 million and former President Barack Obama to help Democrats win five House seats in the 2026 midterm elections.
  • The GOP complaint alleges the map boosted Hispanic voting power by creating two new districts, violating the 14th and 15th Amendments, while Attorney General Pam Bondi called it a brazen power grab and plaintiffs are represented by Dhillon Law Group.
  • A decision could come by next June or July and may prompt lower courts and potential re-redistricting in Republican-led states, weakening Black and Latino voters ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The U.S. Department of Justice, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, is suing California to block Proposition 50, which redistricts congressional boundaries and was approved by voters.
  • The lawsuit claims Proposition 50 creates racially gerrymandered districts, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution according to the DOJ.
  • California officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, allegedly prioritized racial demographics to secure a political advantage in upcoming elections.
  • The outcome of this lawsuit could reshape redistricting practices nationwide and potentially impact party control in the U.S. House of Representatives after the 2026 midterm elections.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.