DOJ opens investigation into Tim Walz, Jacob Frey: reports


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

DOJ investigation

The Department of Justice opened a federal inquiry into Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, reportedly over statements they’ve made about a surge of federal immigration authorities into the state.

ICE in Minnesota

Thousands of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and Border Patrol agents have been deployed to Minnesota in recent weeks, something local officials have criticized.

Walz and Frey respond

Walz and Frey called the DOJ’s investigation an attempt to “weaponize” the government and “intimidate” them. Both said they have not received subpoenas connected to the probe.


Full story

The Department of Justice is reportedly investigating Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, as well as other officials in the state, over allegations they conspired to slow federal immigration agents.

CBS News first reported the story, attributing “multiple sources familiar with the matter.” A U.S. official told the news outlet that the investigation stems from remarks Walz and Frey made about the almost 3,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and Border Patrol agents recently deployed to Minneapolis. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

This surge of federal immigration authorities to the state, as well as the fatal shooting of 37-year-old Renee Good by an ICE agent on Jan.7, have been condemned by local leaders including Walz and Frey and led to protests not only in Minnesota but nationwide. 

Federal inquiry

A U.S. official told CBS that the inquiry is focused on 18 U.S.C. § 372. The law says it’s a crime for two or more people to conspire to prevent federal officers from carrying out their duties “by force, intimidation, or threat.”

One source confirmed to The Washington Post that the DOJ planned to serve Frey and Walz with subpoenas Friday, though a spokesperson for Frey said he had not been served with one as of that evening. Walz said in a statement Friday that the office of the governor has not received any notice of the investigation.

“Two days ago it was Elissa Slotkin. Last week it was Jerome Powell. Before that, Mark Kelly. Weaponizing the justice system and threatening political opponents is a dangerous, authoritarian tactic,” he said. “The only person not being investigated for the shooting of Renee Good is the federal agent who shot her.”

Frey, in a statement of his own, called the investigation “an obvious attempt to intimidate me for standing up for Minneapolis, local law enforcement, and residents against the chaos and danger this Administration has brought to our city.”

“I will not be intimidated,” he said. “My focus remains where it’s always been: keeping our city safe.”

Straight Arrow News reached out to the Department of Justice for comment. Though it has not specifically commented on the probe publicly, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X Friday: “A reminder to all those in Minnesota: No one is above the law.”

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, earlier this week, addressed Walz and Frey in a tweet, calling them a “FAILED governor and a TERRIBLE mayor.”

“Walz and Frey — I’m focused on stopping YOU from your terrorism by whatever means necessary. This is not a threat. It’s a promise,” he said.

Aaron Terr, director public advocacy for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said if elected officials’ basis for investigating Minnesota officials is for their criticism of federal immigration enforcement operations, “it is blatantly unconstitutional.”

“The right to condemn government action without fear of government punishment is the foundation of the First Amendment,” Terr said in a statement. 

There are only a few exceptions to the First Amendment, he added, and these are narrow for a reason: “to prevent the government from wielding its power to squash dissent.”

“If criticism of government policy can be rebranded as a crime, then constitutional protections become meaningless and the government becomes unaccountable,” he said. “That is precisely the danger the First Amendment is meant to prevent, and it is a line no administration may cross.”

Tags: , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The reported Department of Justice investigation into Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey raises questions about the boundaries between federal authority and state or local dissent, with implications for free speech and government accountability.

Federal-state relations

The inquiry illustrates ongoing tensions between federal immigration enforcement and state or local government actions, highlighting the complexity of navigating jurisdictional boundaries.

Free speech and dissent

According to Aaron Terr of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, investigating officials for their criticism of federal policy could threaten First Amendment protections and discourage lawful dissent.

Government accountability

Statements from Walz and Frey, as well as national public debate, reflect growing concerns over the application of investigative powers and the importance of ensuring oversight of both federal and local authorities.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 225 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The Department of Homeland Security stated that nearly 3,000 federal immigration agents have been deployed to Minnesota resulting in more than 2,500 arrests as part of the largest immigration enforcement operation in the state's history.

Community reaction

Local community members, particularly immigrants and activists, have organized protests and patrols in response to federal immigration operations. State and local leaders repeatedly urge peaceful demonstrations while expressing concerns about federal tactics and community safety.

Debunking

Legal experts cited by both left and right sources say that criticizing federal immigration enforcement and refusing cooperation does not legally constitute obstruction or conspiracy unless there is direct coordination to impede law enforcement activity.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frames the DOJ investigation as a politically motivated "intimidation tactic" and "weaponizing the justice system," emphasizing officials' "decry" and link it to the "Trump administration's crusade." This perspective often provides context regarding prior ICE actions.
  • Media outlets in the center maintain a neutral tone, using "probing" and "alleged" without endorsing political motives.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize a "conspiracy to impede" federal agents, using terms like "far-left" and "Sanctuary Showdown" to imply criminal defiance, sometimes introducing unverified allegations.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

225 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The U.S. Justice Department is investigating Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for allegedly obstructing federal immigration enforcement through public statements, according to individuals familiar with the investigation.
  • Walz's office stated it has not received any formal notice regarding the investigation, affirming a commitment to public safety amid escalating tensions in Minneapolis and St. Paul.
  • Frey described the DOJ investigation as an intimidation tactic against his administration, asserting his dedication to protecting local law enforcement and residents from perceived chaos brought by the federal government.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice opened an investigation into Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey over possible obstruction, with a grand jury issuing subpoenas as sources say the probe is in early stages.
  • Nearly 3,000 ICE and Border Patrol agents were deployed to Minneapolis after the Jan. 7 shooting of Renee Good, intensifying protests and prompting Walz and Frey to publicly rebuke the federal surge.
  • Prosecutors are focusing on 18 U.S.C. § 372, which targets conspiracies to impede federal officers through force or threats, as investigators examine whether Walz and Frey's statements encouraged obstruction.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Justice Department has opened an investigation into Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for allegedly obstructing immigration enforcement efforts.
  • The investigation includes potential grand jury subpoenas related to claims of obstruction and a fraud scheme in Minnesota, as stated in a report by CBS News.
  • Both officials have publicly criticized federal immigration enforcement and asserted that the investigation is a political intimidation tactic.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.