DOJ sues New York over law shielding immigrants from federal detention


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

DOJ files lawsuit against New York

The DOJ is suing New York over a law that restricts federal immigration arrests at state courthouses, claiming it obstructs enforcement.

Supporters' arguments

Supporters argue the law protects due process and public safety by ensuring court access.

ICE enforcements at courts nationwide

The lawsuit follows a nationwide ICE operation targeting undocumented immigrants at federal court hearings.


Full story

The U.S. Department of Justice has sued New York over its “Protect Our Courts Act,” arguing the law intentionally shields even dangerous individuals from lawful federal detention. The agency also criticized the law for criminalizing federal agents who violate the protections, essentially arguing it punishes them for doing their job.

“Through these enactments, New York obstructs federal law enforcement and facilitates the evasion of federal law by dangerous criminals, notwithstanding federal agents’ statutory mandate to detain and remove illegal aliens,” the complaint states.

The department argued that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which gives federal law priority over state and local statute, should nullify the New York law.

The lawsuit came as nationwide enforcement operations by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement got underway. One tactic included targeting immigrants residing in the United States illegally who showed up for routine hearings at federal immigration courts.

Supporters say law ensures due process

Supporters of New York’s Protect Our Courts Act said the law is vital for maintaining public safety and due process, ensuring people aren’t afraid to appear in court.

Jess D’Amelia, a spokeswoman for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, told The New York Times the lawsuit was an apparent “waste of federal resources.”

“It’s important that witnesses, victims, and ordinary people can make use of our court system and feel safe in our courthouses and other state facilities,” D’Amelia said in a statement. “There is no sanctuary in New York for people who commit crimes.”

Immigrant Defense Project condemns DOJ lawsuit

The Immigrant Defense Project, an organization focused on protecting immigrant rights, strongly condemned the DOJ’s legal action.

“The Trump administration has not hesitated to use the courthouse trap. Recently, people who appear at mandatory immigration court hearings and check-ins have been ripped from their loved ones and detained. As a result, the hallways of federal buildings are lined with families crying, scared, and confused,” officials with the organization said in a statement.

Federal enforcement expands beyond New York

The DOJ was actively pursuing legal action against other local governments it believed were interfering with the federal government’s authority over immigration enforcement. The department has sued Chicago, as well as four cities in New Jersey and others across the country.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) and Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The lawsuit between the U.S. Department of Justice and New York over the Protect Our Courts Act highlights conflicts between federal and state authority regarding immigration enforcement and access to the justice system.

Federal vs. state authority

The dispute underscores ongoing tensions over jurisdiction between federal immigration enforcement and state laws designed to protect individuals interacting with the courts.

Access to justice

Supporters of the law argue that safeguarding courthouses from certain immigration enforcement actions ensures that witnesses, victims, and others can safely participate in legal proceedings.

Immigration enforcement policies

The story reflects broader national debates over how, where, and when federal authorities should detain undocumented immigrants, especially in contexts involving local and state legal systems.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 39 media outlets

Context corner

Immigration enforcement in courthouses has been contentious for years. States like New York and California have enacted laws to limit federal arrests at state courthouses, citing the need for open access to justice and public safety for all residents. Such efforts reflect longstanding debates between federal supremacy and states' rights within the U.S. legal system.

Diverging views

Articles in the "left" category emphasize the law's role in protecting immigrant rights and judicial access, criticizing federal enforcement as disruptive and harmful to due process. The "right" category focuses on claims that sanctuary policies obstruct federal law, arguing these laws enable criminal behavior and undermine immigration enforcement. These are competing narratives about safety versus access to justice.

Do the math

The Protect Our Courts Act is statewide policy in New York, which, according to some sources, is home to nearly 40% foreign-born residents. Enforcement in courthouses has been a focus, with federal officials arguing arrests there are safer due to security screenings, but the articles do not provide specific arrest or cost figures.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

39 total sources

Powered by Ground News™