Dunkin’ ad sparks backlash over genetics after American Eagle controversy


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

'Golden summer'

Dunkin’ is facing backlash over a new ad referencing “genetics,” just days after American Eagle came under fire for similar themes in a campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney.

Themes around genetics

Critics say both ads promote Eurocentric beauty standards, while others point out that Dunkin’s messaging is confusing and contradictory.

Polling shows otherwise

Despite the controversy, TMZ reports that independent polling shows most viewers still find the American Eagle ad appealing.


Full story

Dunkin’ is under fire for its new summer ad featuring actor Gavin Casalegno, just days after American Eagle’s campaign with Sydney Sweeney sparked backlash online. Both ads have drawn criticism for promoting narrow beauty standards, particularly around genetics.

Critics question “genetics” messaging

In the Dunkin’ ad, Casalegno confidently declares at the beginning, “This tan? Genetics. Just got my color analysis back, and guess what? Golden summer.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Viewers were quick to point out that it could celebrate Eurocentric features. One user commented on TikTok, “Genuinely what does a drink have to do with genetics???” Another user celebrated, writing, “Yessss Dunkin!! We want to see more white attractive people.”

Even corporations are getting involved. Michaels Stores commented on their TikTok, “Dunkin… we have thoughts.” 

@dunkin

golden hour hits different with Dunkin’

♬ original sound – Dunkin’

Some also found the script unclear. Later in the ad, Casalegno adds, “Every time I drink a Dunkin’ Golden Hour refresher, it’s like the sun just finds me.”

On Instagram, one user wrote, “This copy is totally contradictory… It starts as genetics giving him his golden skin, but at the end says it’s due to the drink.”

Side-by-side backlash for brand campaigns

The controversy echoes the backlash American Eagle received after launching its denim campaign with Sydney Sweeney. Like Casalegno, Sweeney is white — an image that some critics said reinforces narrow beauty ideals.

In one ad, Sweeney says the traits she inherited through her “genes” make her feel confident, just before the camera pans toward her chest. She responds by quipping, “Hey! Eyes up here.”

Beyond the wordplay on “genes,” some critics took issue with how the American Eagle ad sexualizes Sweeney.

Campaigns become meme fuel

Online, the American Eagle campaign has become the subject of parody.

TikTok creators began mocking the Dunkin’ ad’s scripting and tone, sparking a wave of spoofs. One even reimagined the ad using a deepfake of Donald Trump. Another viral post showed a mock Levi’s commercial starring Beyoncé.

These parody ads suggest a growing online fatigue with brands using vague or aspirational language tied to identity, especially when the models shown all look the same.

The brand has not directly addressed the controversy. However, TMZ reports that internal polling shows 70% of viewers still find the ad appealing.

At the time of publication, neither brand has responded to Straight Arrow News’ request for comment.

Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The reaction to recent Dunkin’ and American Eagle ads highlights ongoing debate over beauty standards in advertising and how corporate messaging can prompt public backlash and online parody.

Beauty standards in advertising

Public criticism centers on the perceived reinforcement of narrow, Eurocentric beauty ideals, with viewers questioning the impact of genetic references and casting choices in brand campaigns.

Corporate responses and public backlash

The controversy demonstrates how major brands face scrutiny over their messaging and casting choices, with both Dunkin’ and American Eagle experiencing calls for accountability and online debate but remaining largely silent.

Online parody and culture

Public reaction has extended beyond criticism, with viral spoofs and memes reflecting cultural fatigue around repeated marketing tropes and the connection between aspirational brand language and identity.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.