Skip to main content
Politics

Ed Dept gives schools ultimatum: End DEI programs or lose funding


  • The U.S. Department of Education has given K-12 schools 10 days to certify they don’t offer DEI programs, or risk losing federal funding. State commissioners must confirm schools comply with anti-discrimination rules under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
  • The National Parents Union and others argue the directive undermines local control and violates free speech rights.
  • The department’s letter references the Supreme Court’s Students v. Harvard ruling, which mandates eliminating racial discrimination in school programs.

Full Story

The U.S. Department of Education has issued a new directive to K-12 schools nationwide, demanding compliance with the Trump administration’s anti-discrimination policies or risk losing federal financial assistance.

Media Landscape

See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn more
Left 45% Center 43% Right 10%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Department of Education says funding is a ‘privilege, not a right’

In a notice sent Thursday, April 3, state commissioners overseeing education agencies were given ten days to certify that the schools under their purview do not offer any programs or curricula tied to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). By returning the signed document, officials confirm that the schools comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color or national origin.

“Federal financial assistance is a privilege, not a right,” said Craig Trainor, assistant secretary for the Department of Education’s Civil Rights Office. “When state education commissioners accept federal funds, they agree to abide by federal anti-discrimination requirements.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The federal government contributes to public school funding. According to the most recent Census data from 2022, nearly 14% of public school funding comes from federal sources. Some states are more reliant than others. Mississippi, for example, gets about 23% of its revenue from federal funds, while Michigan’s public school system receives about 14% of its funding from the government.

National Parents Union weighs in

Organizations like the National Parents Union have been vocal in ensuring families have a say in these educational policies.

President Keri Rodrigues responded to the new directive, asking, “Is this what the Trump administration calls local control? You can’t say you’re giving control back to states and then dictate how they run their schools.”

New directive from the Department of Education

In its letter, the Department of Education also cites the landmark Students v. Harvard case, in which the Supreme Court ruled that race-specific admissions policies violate the U.S. Constitution, particularly the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law.

The letter references Chief Justice John Roberts’ words from the 2023 decision, “Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it.”

Two months ago, the Department of Education sent out a “Dear Colleague” letter mandating that schools cease using race as a factor in admissions, hiring, promotion, scholarships, discipline and other programs or activities.

ACLU and union challenge the letter

In response, the largest education union and the ACLU filed a lawsuit, arguing that the letter violates teachers’ free speech rights and imposes a vague, potentially harmful directive on schools.

Following the lawsuit, the Department of Education released a Q&A document to address some questions and clarify the letter’s intent.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

[Kalé Carey]

THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SENT A NEW LETTER TO K-12 SCHOOLS NATIONWIDE…. SAYING SCHOOLS MUST EITHER COMPLY WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ANTI-DISCRIMINATION RULES OR RISK LOSING THEIR FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.

ON THURSDAY, STATE COMMISSIONERS IN CHARGE OF EDUCATION AGENCIES RECEIVED A NOTICE GIVING THEM TEN DAYS TO SIGN AND CERTIFY THE SCHOOLS THEY OVERSEE DO NOT OFFER ANY PROGRAMS OR CURRICULUM RELATED TO DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION.

BY RETURNING THE DOCUMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THEY ARE CONFIRMING NOTHING IN THE SCHOOLS’ PROGRAMS VIOLATES TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, WHICH BANS DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, COLOR OR NATIONAL ORIGIN.

ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION’S CIVIL RIGHTS OFFICE SAID, “Federal financial assistance is a privilege, not a right. When state education commissioners accept federal funds, they agree to abide by federal antidiscrimination requirements.”

ACCORDING TO THE MOST RECENT CENSUS DATA FROM 2022, CLOSE TO 14% OF PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING COMES FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. SOME STATES RELY MORE ON FEDERAL FUNDING THAN OTHERS—FOR EXAMPLE, MISSISSIPPI GETS ABOUT 23% OF ITS REVENUE FROM FEDERAL SOURCES. IN CITIES, DETROIT’S PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM GETS NEARLY HALF OF ITS FUNDING FROM THE GOVERNMENT.

WITH FEDERAL FUNDING PLAYING A CRUCIAL ROLE IN SCHOOLS, ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE NATIONAL PARENTS UNION ARE MAKING SURE FAMILIES HAVE A VOICE IN THESE DECISIONS.

 IN RESPONSE TO THE ORDERS, THE PRESIDENT QUESTIONED, “Is this what the Trump administration calls local control? You can’t say you’re giving control back to states and then dictate how they run their schools.”

ONCE AGAIN, THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CITES THE STUDENTS V. HARVARD CASE, WHERE THE SUPREME COURT RULED THAT RACE-SPECIFIC ADMISSIONS VIOLATE THE U.S. CONSTITUTION—PARTICULARLY THE 14TH AMENDMENT.

THE LETTER QUOTES CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS FROM THE 2023 DECISION, STATING, ‘ELIMINATING RACIAL DISCRIMINATION MEANS ELIMINATING ALL OF IT.’

IN FEBRUARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SENT OUT A ‘DEAR COLLEAGUE LETTER’ MANDATING SCHOOLS END THE USE OF RACE IN ADMISSIONS, HIRING, PROMOTION, SCHOLARSHIPS, DISCIPLINE AND OTHER PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES.

THE LARGEST EDUCATION UNION AND THE ACLU CHALLENGED THE LETTER IN COURT, ARGUING IT VIOLATES TEACHERS’ FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AND ISSUES A VAGUE, POTENTIALLY HARMFUL DIRECTIVE TO SCHOOLS.

FOLLOWING THE LAWSUIT, THE DEPARTMENT LATER RELEASED A Q&A DOCUMENT ADDRESSING SOME THE QUESTIONS AND CLARIFYING THE LETTER’S INTENT. 

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M KALÉ CAREY 

FIND MORE OF THE LATEST STORIES RIGHT NOW ON THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS MOBILE APP.