El Salvador says US has legal jurisdiction over migrants deported to CECOT


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

El Salvador filing

El Salvador says the U.S. maintains legal jurisdiction over 140 Venezuelan migrants deported to its high-security CECOT prison.

Trump Admin’s stance

The Trump administration has previously argued responsibility transferred once the migrants entered El Salvador’s custody.

Questions remain

The conflicting filings could impact ongoing lawsuits seeking the return of the deported individuals.


Full story

The question of who holds legal jurisdiction over 140 Venezuelan migrants deported from the U.S. to El Salvador’s high-security CECOT prison remains unresolved, with court filings from both governments offering conflicting explanations. In its latest filing, the Salvadoran government stated that the United States is legally responsible for the individuals, despite prior statements from the Trump administration claiming that authority transferred once the migrants entered El Salvador’s prison system.

The March deportation operation drew international attention. The Department of Homeland Security placed more than 100 migrants — identified as Venezuelan gang members and criminals — on planes and flew them to El Salvador.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Shortly after the deportations, migrant advocacy groups and attorneys representing some of the deported families filed lawsuits. The legal teams argued that the deportations violated the law and demanded that the U.S. return the migrants.

Trump administration officials maintain they no longer have jurisdiction over the migrants, claiming the individuals are now under El Salvador’s authority.

Salvadoran government filing

In a court filing responding to a United Nations inquiry, the Salvadoran government stated that it played only a limited role in the deportations.

“The actions of the State of El Salvador have been limited to the implementation of a bilateral cooperation mechanism with another State,” the filing said.

El Salvador argued to the U.N. that since it was not involved in the early deportation process, legal questions regarding the deportations should be directed to the U.S.

“The jurisdiction and legal responsibility for these people lie exclusively with the competent foreign authorities, by virtue of international agreements signed and in accordance with the principles of sovereignty and international cooperation in criminal matters.”

ACLU lawyer responds

Lee Gelernt, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union and the lead counsel in one of the lawsuits filed against the Trump administration, responded to El Salvador’s statement. He said it’s proof that Trump officials do have the power to return the prisoners.

“El Salvador said out loud what everyone knew: The United States is in charge of the Venezuelans shipped off in the middle of the night back in March,” Gelernt said.

Impact on ongoing court cases

The Trump administration has not responded to media inquiries about the Salvadoran government’s filing. However, the White House previously asserted that U.S. jurisdiction applied only while the individuals remained in federal custody and that legal responsibility transferred once El Salvador took custody of them.

It remains unclear whether El Salvador’s statement will affect the outcome of the ongoing court cases. This includes whether the country with jurisdiction must return some or all of the deported individuals.

Harry Fogle (Video Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The unresolved legal jurisdiction over Venezuelan migrants deported from the U.S. to El Salvador raises questions about international responsibility, the legality of cross-border deportations, and the rights of those affected.

Jurisdictional responsibility

Determining which country is legally responsible for the deported individuals is central to the ongoing legal disputes and may influence future international cooperation on immigration enforcement.

Legal and human rights

Concerns over whether the deportations followed legal processes and addressed the rights of migrants highlight ongoing debates about compliance with international law and human rights obligations.

International cooperation and accountability

The case underscores the complexities and potential challenges in bilateral agreements and international coordination regarding the handling and treatment of migrants with criminal allegations.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 99 media outlets

Global impact

This case underscores how U.S. immigration policy decisions reverberate internationally, affecting diplomatic relations and legal interpretations of custody across borders. The involvement of the United Nations and cooperation between the U.S. and El Salvador amplifies scrutiny of cross-border agreements and sets a precedent for how other countries might handle similar deportation and detention arrangements.

Global impact

The Alien Enemies Act, invoked in this case, dates back to the 18th century and is historically associated with wartime powers used in exceptional national security circumstances. While previously applied during conflicts such as World War II, its invocation for peacetime immigration enforcement represents a rare and controversial development in American legal and immigration history.

Policy impact

By moving migrants to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, the U.S. administration sidestepped standard legal procedures. This shift has sparked multiple lawsuits and increased scrutiny of cross-border detention arrangements, affecting how future immigration enforcement and international agreements may be structured and overseen.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left emphasize the Trump administration’s alleged dishonesty and constitutional violations surrounding the deportation and control of migrants at the "notorious" CECOT prison, using charged terms like “immigration crackdown” and framing the policy as an abusive, archaic wartime maneuver.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right underscore legal authority and border security prerogatives, portraying the deportations as necessary to combat “hybrid criminal state” gangs and stressing government sovereignty, while de-emphasizing prison conditions.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

99 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • El Salvador's government has confirmed that the Trump administration maintains control over Venezuelan men deported to El Salvador's CECOT prison, contradicting previous claims from U.S. officials.
  • Lawyers representing over 100 migrants are challenging their deportations, asserting that their rights to due process were violated.
  • The Trump administration has invoked the Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport alleged gang members without due process protections.
  • ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt stated that the administration has not been truthful with the court or the public regarding control over these deported individuals.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • El Salvador told UN investigators that the U.S. controls over 100 Venezuelan men at CECOT, contradicting public claims by Salvadoran officials.
  • El Salvador told the U.N. it has no legal responsibility for the Venezuelan migrants deported by Trump under the Alien Enemies Act, contradicting U.S. claims of control.
  • El Salvador told the U.N. it controls over 100 Venezuelan migrants at CECOT, contradicting U.S. claims of exclusive control and raising legal and sovereignty disputes.
  • The U.N. investigates mid-March deportations; the U.S. claims it is powerless to return the men, citing lack of access to U.S. constitutional guarantees.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The government of El Salvador has told United Nations investigators that the Trump administration controls Venezuelan men deported to CECOT prison, contrary to prior claims by officials.
  • Lawyers for over 100 migrants are challenging their deportations to CECOT, a notorious Salvadoran prison.
  • The Trump administration claims it cannot return the men because they are now beyond U.S. court reach.
  • Immigrant rights groups have sued to invalidate the prison deal with El Salvador, stating it violates the Constitution.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.