EPA defends deregulation efforts, says environment will not be harmed


Summary

What Does Zeldin Say?

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has stated his agency’s deregulation efforts under the Trump administration aim to balance environmental protection with economic growth and will not harm the environment or American public.

Policy Reversal

The EPA is reversing several Biden-era policies, including measures aimed at promoting electric vehicles, reducing coal use, and managing air pollution, which Zeldin claims imposed trillions of dollars in compliance costs on U.S. industries.

Environmental Groups Respond

Environmental groups, including the Sierra Club, have voiced opposition to the rollbacks, warning of increased public health risks as a result of these actions.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

What Does Zeldin Say?

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has stated his agency’s deregulation efforts under the Trump administration aim to balance environmental protection with economic growth and will not harm the environment or American public.

Policy Reversal

The EPA is reversing several Biden-era policies, including measures aimed at promoting electric vehicles, reducing coal use, and managing air pollution, which Zeldin claims imposed trillions of dollars in compliance costs on U.S. industries.

Environmental Groups Respond

Environmental groups, including the Sierra Club, have voiced opposition to the rollbacks, warning of increased public health risks as a result of these actions.


Full story

  • EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has stated that his agency’s deregulation efforts under the Trump administration aim to balance environmental protection with economic growth. He says they will not harm the environment or the American public.
  • The EPA is reversing several Biden-era policies, including measures aimed at promoting electric vehicles, reducing coal use and managing air pollution, which Zeldin claims imposed trillions of dollars in compliance costs on U.S. industries.
  • Environmental groups, including the Sierra Club, have voiced opposition to the rollbacks, warning of increased public health risks as a result of these actions.

Full Story

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin said Sunday, April 20, that his agency’s ongoing efforts to roll back regulations will not negatively impact the environment. Speaking on CBS News, Zeldin described the EPA’s current approach as an attempt to balance environmental protections with economic considerations.

“We have to both protect the environment and grow the economy,” Zeldin said.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

What has the EPA been working to deregulate?

Under the Trump administration, the EPA has been reversing several policies implemented under the Biden administration. These include initiatives aimed at increasing electric vehicle production, phasing out coal use and regulating air pollutants such as soot and mercury.

According to Zeldin, the repealed policies imposed compliance costs amounting to “trillions” of dollars across multiple U.S. industries. He argues that eliminating these regulations would lower those costs, which he said are currently being passed on to consumers.

How are environmental groups responding to these changes?

Environmental advocacy organizations have voiced opposition to the EPA’s rollbacks. The Sierra Club described the deregulation efforts as “deadly,” “dangerous,” and “a wholesale attack on the American people.” The group cited previous estimates from Biden-era officials, who claimed that the regulations could prevent thousands of premature deaths and save tens of billions of dollars in public health costs.

What happens next?

Zeldin maintains the changes will not result in harm to either the environment or public health. He also noted that a formal process for public comments will be available and encouraged Americans to submit feedback on the agency’s policy decisions.

Jake Larsen (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The story highlights the ongoing tension between environmental policies and economic growth, reflecting broader debates in U.S. policy-making.

Regulatory Rollback

The EPA's rollback of Biden-era regulations signals a significant shift in environmental policy, emphasizing economic considerations over strict regulatory frameworks.

Public Health Risks

The opposition from environmental groups underscores the potential public health implications of deregulation, raising concerns about air quality and related health outcomes.

Economic Debate

The argument for balancing economic growth with environmental protection illustrates the complexities of policy-making, as stakeholders navigate competing interests.

Get the big picture

Community reaction

Local community reactions include mixed feelings, with some residents expressing hope for better air quality and faster cleanup efforts at contaminated sites, while others remain skeptical of how enforcement changes might affect health and safety.

Context corner

Historically, the intersection of environmental regulation and economic development has been contentious, particularly during shifts in political leadership. The ongoing debate around the balance of these priorities reflects deeper societal values and the evolution of environmental policy in the U.S.

Global impact

U.S. environmental policy shifts significantly impact global climate agreements and energy markets. Zeldin's approach may influence international perceptions of U.S. commitment to addressing climate change while prioritizing national economic interests.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

79 total sources

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™