EPA to cut program that puts energy efficiency stickers on your appliances


Summary

Energy Star elimination

According to a report, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to eliminate the Energy Star program, which has labeled energy-efficient appliances since 1992.

Program cost and savings

The Energy Star website claims that the program has helped families and businesses save over $500 billion in energy costs since its inception, costing $32 million to run, while reportedly saving consumers $40 billion per year.

Public and industry response

In March, a number of companies and organizations urged EPA administrator Lee Zeldin to maintain Energy Star, arguing that its elimination would not benefit the public.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Energy Star elimination

According to a report, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to eliminate the Energy Star program, which has labeled energy-efficient appliances since 1992.

Program cost and savings

The Energy Star website claims that the program has helped families and businesses save over $500 billion in energy costs since its inception, costing $32 million to run, while reportedly saving consumers $40 billion per year.

Public and industry response

In March, a number of companies and organizations urged EPA administrator Lee Zeldin to maintain Energy Star, arguing that its elimination would not benefit the public.


Full story

For more than three decades, energy-efficient appliances such as washers, dryers, refrigerators and dishwashers have been easy to find at home improvement and big box stores. Customers can always see the products displaying the Energy Star blue label and symbol.

Now, The New York Times has reported that the Environmental Protection Agency plans to eliminate the Energy Star program, which former President George H. W. Bush created in 1992.

During a staff meeting on Monday, May 5, the EPA announced that it would eliminate the divisions overseeing climate change and energy efficiency as part of a reorganization. The offices being eliminated include the division that controls Energy Star.

What did the notice from top managers supposedly say?

The report quoted Paul Gunning, the director of the Office of Atmospheric Protections, as saying, “The Energy Star program and all other climate work, outside of what’s required by statute, is being de-prioritized and eliminated.”

Energy

Energy Star has saved families and businesses $500 billion in energy costs since George H. W. Bush created the program in 1992.

The blue label signified that an appliance met government energy efficiency standards. Many American shoppers look for the label to use less electricity, while at the same time reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.  

A money saver?

Paula Glover, the president of the Alliance to Save Energy, told the Times that the program costs about $32 million a year to implement but saves $40 billion on utility bills each year.

“Eliminating the Energy Star program is counterintuitive to this administration’s pledge to reduce household costs,” she said.

The Energy Star website touts that it has helped families and businesses save more than $500 billion in energy costs since its inception.

Why is the change coming now?

President Donald Trump has criticized energy-efficient appliances since taking office in January. He already signed an executive order eliminating federal standards on low-flow toilets and showerheads, which are designed to conserve water. He tried, unsuccessfully, to cut funding for Energy Star during his first administration, believing that the private sector could run it.

A spokeswoman for the EPA did not confirm for the NYT that they are eliminating Energy Star, but said they are making “organizational improvements to the personnel structure that will directly benefit the American people and better advance the agency’s core mission.”

In March, several companies and organizations urged new EPA administrator Lee Zeldin to keep Energy Star, telling him that eliminating the program would not serve the American people. 

On Friday, May 2, Zeldin announced that the EPA is also cutting staff to levels seen in the 1980s when there were between 11,000 and 14,000 employees. It currently has a workforce of about 15,000 people.

“This reorganization will bring much-needed efficiencies to incorporate science into our rulemakings and sharply focus our work on providing the cleanest air, land and water for our communities,” Zeldin said.  

Zeldin claimed the moves would save $300 million a year for the American people.

Americans have come to recognize the blue label of Energy Star since its introduction in 1992. According to energy efficiency advocates, the program has enjoyed support from all presidents and administrations, except for President Trump.

Alex Delia (Senior Managing Editor), Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer), and Bast Bramhall (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

The EPA's plan to eliminate the Energy Star program could influence consumer energy costs, environmental policy, and the federal government’s approach to regulating energy efficiency and climate initiatives in the United States.

Energy efficiency standards

Eliminating the Energy Star program would remove a widely used federal mechanism that helps consumers identify and purchase energy-efficient appliances, potentially affecting household energy consumption and costs.

Climate policy and emissions

The proposed cuts are part of a broader reduction in climate-focused programs at the EPA, which, according to multiple sources including CNN and The Washington Post, could undermine efforts to monitor and regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 27 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The Energy Star program reportedly costs $32 million annually but is credited with helping Americans save over $40 billion a year in energy expenses, returning roughly $350 for every federal dollar invested. Since its inception in 1992, the program claims to have reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 4 billion metric tons.

Debunking

No definitive confirmation from the EPA has been given regarding the immediate termination of the Energy Star program. Some coverage suggests Congress would need to approve its official end.

Oppo research

Critics of the move argue that eliminating Energy Star would contradict stated goals to lower household energy costs and would undercut consumer access to reliable energy efficiency information. Trade groups, NGOs and bipartisan lawmakers have voiced opposition, citing both environmental and economic rationale for the program’s continuation.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the Trump administration’s plan to end the Energy Star program as an environmentally detrimental and “incredibly shortsighted” attack on climate progress, highlighting potential increases in energy costs and regulatory “overreach,” and often framing it within a broader culture war narrative.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right de-emphasized environmental consequences, treating deregulation as a practical rollback of government intervention without overt condemnation, subtly framing Energy Star’s elimination as part of agency restructuring or regulatory relief.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

60 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Environmental Protection Agency plans to eliminate the Energy Star program, known for certifying energy-efficient appliances, according to two sources briefed on the matter.
  • The Energy Star program has saved American families over $500 billion since 1992 by reducing energy costs, according to a 2023 federal report.
  • Officials stated that the program, which has helped save American families over $500 billion in energy costs since 1992, will be eliminated as part of broader budget cuts.
  • Bipartisan groups are urging the administration to preserve Energy Star, which has widespread recognition among U.S. Households.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Trump administration plans to shut down two major EPA offices that handle climate initiatives and promote energy efficiency, such as the Energy Star program, by early 2025.
  • This plan follows earlier efforts by President Trump to dismantle or privatize Energy Star and comes amid broader rollback of Biden-era pollution rules and uncertainty about employee impacts.
  • Energy Star certifies appliances that use less energy, such as refrigerators and air conditioners, making it easier for consumers to access eligible products and tax incentives, and contributing to lower energy bills for more than 90% of households in the United States.
  • Energy Star costs $32 million annually but saves American families over $40 billion each year with a federal return of $350 per dollar invested, and is nearly universally supported.
  • Closing these divisions may weaken official U.S. Efforts to measure and reduce greenhouse gases like methane, potentially hindering EPA’s authority to combat pollution driving global warming.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™