‘Everyone hates it’: EPA head to target ‘start-stop’ vehicle function


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Start-stop technology

According to the article, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) previously provided federal credits for equipping new vehicles with start-stop technology, which is designed to reduce emissions from idling vehicles and save gas.

Public reception

The article notes that start-stop technology has been widely criticized by drivers, with reactions to the announcement described as largely positive. Many drivers find the feature inconvenient and some have compared it to other unpopular eco-friendly measures.

Functionality concerns

Some drivers and mechanics have expressed concerns about the impact of start-stop technology on vehicle performance and component lifespan. According to anecdotal accounts from mechanics cited in the article, vehicles equipped with start-stop technology may require parts like starters and alternators to be repaired earlier than vehicles without the technology.


Full story

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin said on Monday morning, May 12, that the “start-stop” function in vehicles will no longer be supported by the federal government. The EPA subsidizes the feature to reduce emissions from idling vehicles and save drivers gas.

“Start/stop technology: where your car dies at every red light so companies get a climate participation trophy,” Zeldin said in a post to X. “EPA approved it, and everyone hates it, so we’re fixing it.”

The EPA does not mandate start-stop technology. However, the agency does provide federal credits for equipping new vehicles with the technology. As of 2022, a 2023 EPA report said roughly 65% of passenger cars on the road were equipped with start-stop technology.

Is the feature unpopular?

A Google search of the feature will produce millions of results, some asking why people seem to dislike the feature, others from companies explaining how the feature works and even more results, like lists of new vehicles that don’t have the function, as well as advice on how to permanently disable the start-stop feature.

Most vehicles require the function to be turned off each time the engine is initially started.

More harm than good?

Since the integration of start-stop technology became more prevalent, discussions have ranged from the inconvenience of losing engine power to whether the increased cycling of the engine wears down parts earlier in the vehicle’s lifespan.

Proponents of the feature say that vehicle components like starters and alternators have been built with more robust parts to withstand the increased use. They do stress that having a well-maintained battery is an important factor in the technology properly functioning, as the vehicle’s electronics and any climate controls will run on battery power when the car is sitting still.

There have been anecdotal accounts from mechanics that, even with more robust components, vehicles equipped with start-stop technology do require those parts to be repaired earlier than vehicles without that function.

How have people responded since the announcement?

Reactions to Zeldin’s post on X were largely positive, with some referring to the function as “the paper straw of the road.” 

“I’ve shut this off from day one. Only problem is there’s no way to permanently disable and have to shut it off after every startup,” a New York-based talk show host said in reaction to Zeldin’s comment.

Other commentors noted that the start-stop function can become a serious hindrance to driving, such as times when a car is waiting to turn left in a median. If the start-stop engages, cutting through oncoming traffic could be slowed, making the driver’s timing to turn through any incoming traffic delayed. 

It’s not yet clear what actions the EPA plans to take in no longer supporting start-stop technology, nor what car companies may do in response to the announcement.

Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The decision by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to withdraw its support for start-stop vehicle technology has implications for environmental policy, automotive design, and everyday drivers' experiences.

Regulatory change

The EPA's move to no longer support start-stop technology reflects a shift in federal emissions policy and its practical application.

Consumer experience

Widespread criticism and inconvenience reported by drivers have influenced the debate over start-stop technology and its role in modern vehicles.

Environmental impact

Start-stop technology has been promoted to reduce vehicle emissions and fuel consumption, raising questions about balancing environmental goals with driver preferences.