Extra! Extra! Read all about these social media fraudsters


Premium content: This is from our subscriber-exclusive Media Miss newsletter, where we will take you inside the algorithms and agendas shaping what you see.

Full story

This week, I dig into a pay-for-likes social media scheme that’s found a new home on the websites of local newspapers. Plus, new media Miss poll results just dropped — and y’all are very worried about political misinformation. 

Media Mechanics

You could make a few friends — or you could pay someone to like all the cat photos you’ve uploaded to Facebook. 

And if you’re on the search for a bunch of spammy bot accounts that’ll praise your cat for being so adorable, look no further than this 152-year-old newspaper in Buffalo, New York. 

The Buffalo News has been serving its community with breaking news and Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalism since December 1873. Now, in the digital era, its website offers tips and tricks about shady, backdoor schemes to “gain algorithm favor” with leading social media companies like Instagram and TikTok.

In my deep dive this week, I dig into a social media scam that’s long dominated illicit marketplaces and dark web forums, but has now made its way to the websites of local newspapers nationwide. 

The ads, which are designed to look like news articles, offer a solution to internet fame — or at least something that looks like it. Buy those X likes, TikTok followers and YouTube views — starting at the doorbuster price of $0.01.

People have been buying social media followers and engagement for years. In fact, it’s led to some embarrassing situations for celebrities, presidents and journalists who’ve been called out for buying fraudulent online clout.

But the articles in mainstream news outlets risk providing the appearance of legitimacy to fraudulent platforms called social media marketing panels, experts told Straight Arrow. SMM panels rely on architecture from cybercrime, including vast networks of computers compromised by viruses, and can be used to perpetuate phishing schemes and other scams. 

I hope you’ll read my latest story, and don’t forget to reach out with your two cents. Got dirt? Email tips to my secure line at mark.keierleber@protonmail.com or on Signal at MarkKeierleber.01.

Miss Spotlights

A new opinion issued by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel says states that participate in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs have to report any undocumented immigrants to the Department of Homeland Security. Each of the 50 states participates in TANF and SSI. Previously, only specific state agencies that gave out TANF or SSI were required to give information to federal immigration authorities. The DOJ’s legal opinion is expected to face pushback from several states.



Election officials are expressing concerns about President Donald Trump’s proposed mail voting rules, with some saying they could lead to delays and disenfranchisement. Some election officials said vendors told them there’s not enough time to print the millions of envelopes that have to be redesigned because of the rule, and court filings show that it’s possible that there’s not enough paper stock to do so. In addition, training and authorizing local election administrators in a portal set up to upload lists of mail voters would take thousands of hours.


Midterms are right around the corner and, in last week’s Media Miss newsletter, we asked you to share your concerns about the spread of political misinformation on social media. Either our reader poll isn’t nationally representative (OK, it isn’t) or the country is very, very, alarmingly worried. 

In fact, almost 86% of respondents said they’re “very concerned” about fake news flooding their feeds this election season. Oof.

One reader asked why the government isn’t “stepping in to police obviously false political messaging,” and another asked if there is “any hope” for social media companies to rein in mis- and disinformation.

Unbalanced Headlines

What happened:
At least four people were killed and more than 60 injured when a U.S. munition struck a building during a wedding in Iran.

🟦 LEFT HEADLINE:
War crime accusations fly at Trump admin after wedding bombed in Iran — Reported by Raw Story on Sept. 2, 2026.

🟥 RIGHT HEADLINE:
US ‘looking into’ reports from Iranian state media that US missile hit wedding — Reported by Washington Examiner on Sept. 2, 2026.

Competing narratives
Left-leaning coverage focuses on civilian casualties and describes the strike as a possible U.S. attack on a wedding, with some headlines using terms like “war crime.”

Right-leaning coverage emphasizes uncertainty around Iranian accounts, U.S. claims that it does not target civilians, and the possibility that the strike was a mistake.

Both agree that people were killed and injured, including a child.

Essential Reads

View more

To read past editions of the Media Miss Newsletter, click here.

Tags: , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.™

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.™

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more