FBI launches criminal investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James


Summary

Federal investigation

Federal authorities are investigating New York Attorney General Letitia James following a mortgage fraud referral from the Trump administration.

Alleged mortgage fraud

The case centers on a Virginia home purchase where James allegedly misrepresented the property as her primary residence.

James denies allegations

James denies wrongdoing, calling the claims politically motivated.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Federal investigation

Federal authorities are investigating New York Attorney General Letitia James following a mortgage fraud referral from the Trump administration.

Alleged mortgage fraud

The case centers on a Virginia home purchase where James allegedly misrepresented the property as her primary residence.

James denies allegations

James denies wrongdoing, calling the claims politically motivated.


Full story

The FBI and the U.S. attorney’s office have launched a criminal investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James. Her attorneys call the issue “political retribution.” 

Property purchase at center of allegations

The probe comes less than one month after the Trump administration referred her for potential mortgage fraud. James and her niece, Shamice Thompson-Hairston, purchased a home in Norfolk, Virginia, for $240,000. On the mortgage document, James stated she intended to occupy the property as her “principal residence.”

To serve as New York attorney general, James must legally reside in New York state.

Federal official accuses James of document falsification

Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte sent a letter in April to the Justice Department, accusing James of falsifying documents to obtain better mortgage terms on the Virginia property. James responded by calling the allegations baseless.

James’ lawyer, Abbe Lowell, responded in a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, calling the Trump administration’s referral “the latest act of improper political retribution.” Lowell argued James was helping her niece with financial support in order to secure the loan, and that the mortgage broker was aware of this arrangement.

In the letter to Bondi, Lowell said a mistake had been made on the mortgage application, writing, “Director Pulte cherry-picked an August 17, 2023 power of attorney that mistakenly stated the property to be Ms. James’ principal residence and at the same time absolutely ignored her very clear and all caps statement two weeks earlier to the mortgage loan broker that ‘[T]his property will not be my primary residence. It will be Shamice’s primary residence.’”

James has not publicly commented on the opening of the investigation.

President Donald Trump and James have a history. After Trump’s first term in the White House, in September 2022, James filed a civil fraud lawsuit against Trump, accusing him and the Trump Organization of inflating asset values on financial statements to secure favorable loans.

In February 2024, New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur F. Engoron ruled in favor of James, ordering Trump to pay more than $450 million in damages and banning Trump from serving as an officer or director of any New York-based company for three years. The case is currently under appeal.

Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

A formal criminal investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James over alleged mortgage fraud is significant as it involves a prominent public official who recently prosecuted high-profile cases, raising questions about the intersection of legal accountability, political retaliation claims, and public trust in institutions.

Legal scrutiny

The opening of a federal criminal investigation into a sitting state attorney general highlights the seriousness of the allegations and the imperative of due process for public officials.

Political context

The investigation is occurring amidst ongoing political tensions between Letitia James and President Donald Trump, with both sides' legal actions and claims of political motivation influencing public and media discourse.

Public trust

Allegations of potential misconduct by a top law enforcement official may affect public confidence in legal institutions and reinforce scrutiny of ethical standards in government.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 35 media outlets

Diverging views

Articles classified as "left" highlight James’ denial of wrongdoing and emphasize claims that the investigation is politically motivated, often focusing on her civil actions against Trump. "Right"-leaning sources tend to present the allegations as credible, highlight the details of the alleged fraud, and frame the investigation as a response to James' prior actions against Trump.

History lesson

There is little precedent for a sitting state attorney general being criminally investigated for personal mortgage fraud. However, accusations of politically motivated investigations are not new. Historically, when officials prosecute powerful figures, particularly those in opposition parties, it often results in reciprocal scrutiny or claims of selective enforcement.

Underreported

Few articles explore in depth how commonly mortgage application errors occur among public officials or in the general population. Another under-reported aspect is the specific process by which referrals of this nature are prioritized by federal authorities, and the potential statute of limitations concerns regarding decades-old transactions.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the FBI probe into New York AG Letitia James primarily as a politically motivated “revenge tour,” emphasizing threats from MAGA supporters and portraying James as a target of partisan hostility, as seen in phrases like “ominous and profane threat” from a MAGA attorney.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight alleged ethical breaches and legal technicalities — including detailed scrutiny of property unit misrepresentations and the use of taxpayer funds for James’s defense — employing sharply critical language such as “unethically,” “corruption in plain sight,” and “breathtaking irony.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

50 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of New York have launched a criminal investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James for alleged mortgage fraud.
  • The FBI and U.S. attorney's office are investigating New York Attorney General Letitia James for alleged mortgage fraud related to misrepresenting residency on mortgage applications for properties in Virginia and Brooklyn.
  • James denied wrongdoing, calling the investigation politically motivated, linked to her previous legal actions against Donald Trump and his business dealings in New York.
  • Federal Housing Finance Agency director William Pulte referred the case to the DOJ, accusing James of falsifying records to receive government-backed loans and favorable mortgage terms.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The FBI has begun a criminal investigation into allegations of mortgage fraud against New York Attorney General Letitia James, as confirmed by law enforcement sources.
  • William Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, alleged that James falsified records to secure favorable loans for properties in Virginia and Brooklyn.
  • James has denied wrongdoing, claiming the allegations are politically motivated and a result of previous conflicts with President Trump.
  • A grand jury has reportedly been impaneled to hear evidence related to the investigation, led by the Albany FBI office.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™