Federal court says Pennsylvania can no longer throw out some mail-in ballots


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

The ruling

The 3rd District Court of Appeals agreed with a lower court ruling on Tuesday, which says that Pennsylvania can’t throw out mail-in ballots with incorrect return dates.

The history

The lawsuit was initially brought by a voter whose ballot was rejected during the 2022 midterm elections.

Could the fight continue?

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has already indicated a willingness to examine the issue, and groups opposed to the ruling are considering their next steps.


Full story

A new milestone has been reached in a years-long fight over mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania. On Tuesday, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s ruling, saying that the state can no longer throw out some of these ballots.

The legal fight between Democrats and Republicans, as well as affiliated groups, centers on a requirement to handwrite the return date on mail-in ballot envelopes. While the ballots themselves in these cases may have no issues, if the return date is incorrect in any way, the ballot gets thrown out.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

What are groups saying?

Republicans contend that the ballots should be thrown out, as a matter of election security, and say that groups fighting in the lawsuit “are essentially fighting to count illegal ballots.” Democrats, like Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, say that ballots shouldn’t be thrown out due to “meaningless errors.”

Other groups on the side of keeping and counting the ballots include the American Federation of Teachers of Pennsylvania, Common Cause Pennsylvania, the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania, the Black Political Empowerment Project and others. AFT President Wendy Coleman says that the decision is a “victory for Pennsylvania voters and our democracy,” according to NBC News.

Groups opposed to the measure include the Republican National Committee and the Pennsylvania Republican Party, which are now looking at options to further combat the ruling.

The history

The case originated when a voter sued over the rejection of their ballot during the 2022 midterm elections. Just two of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties decided to defend the practice, and were later joined by the Republican groups.

The requirement has been the subject of a lengthy legal battle and has resulted in thousands of ballots being thrown out over the years, something that the three-judge panel that handed down the ruling says “seems to hamper rather than facilitate election efficiency.”

The decision also states that the panel was “Unable to justify the Commonwealth’s practice of discarding ballots contained in return envelopes with missing or incorrect dates that has resulted in the disqualification of thousands of presumably proper ballots.”

Why is it so important?

The case could be brought before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which has already stated that it is willing to look into the case.

Pennsylvania is also a politically divided state, having alternated between voting for President Donald Trump in 2016 and 2024, and for former Presidents Joe Biden in 2020 and Barack Obama in 2012. In the last three presidential elections, the winner has been declared with a margin of victory of around only 1%. The Senate race in the 2024 election was won by just 15,000 votes.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A recent U.S. Circuit Court ruling on mail-in ballot rejection policies in Pennsylvania could affect thousands of votes and influence election outcomes in a closely divided state, highlighting the ongoing national debate over voting access and election security.

Mail-in ballot requirements

The court decision addresses whether ballots with incorrect or missing return dates should be counted, impacting how many votes are accepted or disqualified in Pennsylvania elections.

Potential impact on close elections

Pennsylvania's history of narrowly decided races means changing rules for ballot acceptance could directly influence election outcomes, with broader implications for future high-stakes national elections.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 36 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Thousands of ballots have been rejected in Pennsylvania each election due to date errors on envelopes. For example, about 4,500 votes were tossed in 2024.

Community reaction

Supporters of the ruling, including groups like the American Federation of Teachers and Democratic organizations, describe it as a victory for voting rights. Republican groups and the Republican National Committee state they are reviewing their options and emphasize concerns about election security.

Quote bank

Judge D. Brooks Smith wrote, "We are unable to justify the Commonwealth’s practice of discarding ballots contained in return envelopes with missing or incorrect dates." Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro stated, "Throwing out a qualified voter’s ballot just because they forgot to write a date is disenfranchisement and unconstitutional."

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the ruling as a crucial victory against voter suppression, using emotionally charged language such as “throwing out” ballots and “meaningless errors” to highlight disenfranchisement, emphasizing Democratic-aligned groups and criticizing Trump’s “demonization” of mail voting.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right spotlight the legality of ballot validity with cautious skepticism, labeling envelope date issues as “bad” or “incorrect,” framing the court ruling as a “blow” to election integrity efforts, and stressing the importance of preventing fraud despite acknowledging the ruling’s constitutional basis.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

36 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal appeals court ruled that Pennsylvania cannot discard mail-in ballots for incorrect dates on envelopes, citing a violation of voting rights.
  • The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the date requirement offers no practical use in determining ballot validity.
  • Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro labeled the practice of throwing out ballots over the handwritten date as disenfranchisement and unconstitutional.
  • The decision affects thousands of voters each election and was supported by groups like the American Federation of Teachers of Pennsylvania.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A federal appeals court ruled that a Pennsylvania law requiring the disqualification of mail-in ballots with missing or incorrect dates on the return envelope is unconstitutional.
  • The court sided with Democratic-affiliated groups and a teachers union, stating the law improperly burdened the constitutional right to vote.
  • The decision could be overturned if the U.S. Supreme Court takes up the issue, which has been heavily litigated between Democrats seeking to remove the requirement and Republicans defending it.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Third Circuit Appeals Court ruled unanimously that Pennsylvania must count undated and misdated mail-in ballots, deeming it unconstitutional to discard them without consideration.
  • The Republican National Committee sought to discard thousands of these ballots for the 2025 election, but their efforts were unsuccessful.
  • The court noted that the date requirement fails to significantly prevent voter fraud and imposes an unfair burden on voters.
  • The ruling emphasizes that discarding ballots due to minor paperwork issues undermines eligible voters' rights.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

  • .Tensions are rising in Pennsylvania's Senate race, where some Democratic election officials are defying recent court rulings
    Getty Images
    U.S. Elections
    Nov 18, 2024

    WaPo calls Pa. Democrats’ push to count invalid ballots undemocratic

    Tensions are rising in Pennsylvania’s Senate race, where some Democratic election officials are defying recent court rulings on counting ballots after The Associated Press called the race for Republican Dave McCormick. However, some efforts to defy court orders to count certain ballots are being viewed as undemocratic, according to The Washington Post editorial board. Before…

  • Pennsylvania’s U.S. Senate race has sparked a legal showdown over whether to count mail-in ballots missing handwritten dates.
    AP Images
    U.S. Elections
    Nov 15, 2024

    Recount to start in PA Senate race as legal disputes over ballots intensify

    Pennsylvania’s U.S. Senate race between incumbent Democrat Bob Casey and Republican challenger David McCormick sparked a legal showdown over whether to count mail-in ballots missing handwritten dates. With a mandatory recount underway, Republicans are challenging multiple county decisions to include undated or misdated ballots, a move that Democrats argue would disenfranchise voters. In the days…

Timeline

  • .Tensions are rising in Pennsylvania's Senate race, where some Democratic election officials are defying recent court rulings
    Getty Images
    U.S. Elections
    Nov 18, 2024

    WaPo calls Pa. Democrats’ push to count invalid ballots undemocratic

    Tensions are rising in Pennsylvania’s Senate race, where some Democratic election officials are defying recent court rulings on counting ballots after The Associated Press called the race for Republican Dave McCormick. However, some efforts to defy court orders to count certain ballots are being viewed as undemocratic, according to The Washington Post editorial board. Before…

  • Pennsylvania’s U.S. Senate race has sparked a legal showdown over whether to count mail-in ballots missing handwritten dates.
    AP Images
    U.S. Elections
    Nov 15, 2024

    Recount to start in PA Senate race as legal disputes over ballots intensify

    Pennsylvania’s U.S. Senate race between incumbent Democrat Bob Casey and Republican challenger David McCormick sparked a legal showdown over whether to count mail-in ballots missing handwritten dates. With a mandatory recount underway, Republicans are challenging multiple county decisions to include undated or misdated ballots, a move that Democrats argue would disenfranchise voters. In the days…

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.