Federal judge blocks Trump admin from withholding transportation funds


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Ruling

A federal judge has blocked the U.S. Department of Transportation from withholding billions of dollars in funds from 20 states over failure to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement

Reasoning

The judge ruled that there is no plausible connection between transportation funds that are allocated by Congress and federal immigration law.

Legal actions

The injunction comes as 20 states sue the Trump administration over a similar rule imposed by the Department of Homeland Security.


Full story

A federal judge on Thursday, June 19, ruled that the Trump administration cannot withhold billions of dollars in federal funds from 20 Democratic-led states in order to force them to cooperate with immigration enforcement. U.S. District Judge John McConnell of Providence, Rhode Island, ruled that the Department of Transportation (DOT) does not have the authority to compel states to assist U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), calling the requirement unconstitutional.

McConnell’s ruling

In his decision, McConnell said the administration failed to establish a reasonable link between immigration enforcement and the purpose of the federal funds, which are designated for highways, bridges and other transportation projects.

“Congress did not authorize or grant authority to the Secretary of Transportation to impose immigration enforcement conditions on federal dollars specifically appropriated for transportation purposes,” McConnell wrote in his ruling.

The lawsuit

McConnell, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, issued a preliminary injunction blocking the funding condition from being enforced against the 20 states that filed suit.

President Donald Trump and his administration have yet to respond to the ruling. 

The case stems from a lawsuit brought by Democratic state attorneys general, who argued the administration illegally threatened to withhold money to pressure states into cooperating with federal immigration raids.

The attorneys general specifically named Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, who warned on April 24 that states could lose transportation funds if they failed to assist with ICE operations and the enforcement of federal immigration law.

Executive orders

Since returning to the White House on Jan. 20, Trump has signed a series of executive orders targeting so-called sanctuary cities, calling for funding cuts to cities and states that don’t comply with federal immigration enforcement. He has also pledged to launch the largest mass deportation effort in U.S. history.

Sanctuary laws

Sanctuary cities and states typically have statutes that prevent or restrict local authorities from cooperating with federal agencies on civil immigration enforcement, including arrests and detainers.

Democratic California Attorney General Rob Bonta responded to McConnell’s ruling in a statement, saying the president was “treating these funds – funds that go toward improving our roads and keeping planes in the air – as a bargaining chip.”

The ruling comes as 20 Democratic-led states are suing the Trump administration in a similar case in Rhode Island in an effort to halt the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from imposing rules that force states to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement as a condition for them to receive grants from the department.

Mathew Grisham (Digital Producer), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor), and Jason Morrell (Morning Managing Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

A federal court ruling blocking the Trump administration from making transportation funding conditional on state cooperation with immigration enforcement underscores ongoing legal limits on federal power over state policy and highlights tensions between federal and state governments over immigration and funding authority.

Federal-state authority

The court's decision clarifies the balance of power between federal agencies and state governments, particularly regarding the use of federal funding to influence state policies.

Legal and constitutional limits

By declaring the administration's directive unconstitutional, the decision highlights the legal boundaries of executive branch actions and reinforces congressional control over appropriations.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 34 media outlets

Community reaction

State governments and local officials in the plaintiff states expressed relief at the ruling, emphasizing concerns that withholding transportation funds would not only jeopardize infrastructure projects but also pose broader risks for public services and safety. Some immigrant rights groups and community advocates also welcomed the decision as protection against increased federal pressure on local law enforcement practices.

Context corner

This case fits into a longstanding legal and political struggle over federal funding conditions and state autonomy, known as federalism. The issue traces back to debates about so-called “sanctuary” policies in the United States, where some states and cities resist federal demands to enforce immigration laws, sparking court battles over the proper scope of federal powers.

Quote bank

Judge McConnell wrote, “Congress did not authorize or grant authority to the Secretary of Transportation to impose immigration enforcement conditions on federal dollars specifically appropriated for transportation purposes.” California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated, “President Trump is threatening to withhold critical transportation funds unless states agree to carry out his inhumane and illogical immigration agenda for him.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

34 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from requiring 20 states to collaborate with immigration authorities for transportation funds.
  • Judge John McConnell issued a preliminary injunction against the administration's immigration rules affecting transportation funding.
  • McConnell found the rules imposed by Secretary Duffy to be arbitrary and lacking legal authority regarding transportation funds.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal district judge ruled against the Department of Transportation's plan to restrict funding based on immigration compliance, stating it lacked legal authority.
  • U.S. District Judge John McConnell ruled that the Secretary of Transportation lacked authority to impose immigration-related conditions on federal funds for transportation.
  • Twenty Democratic-led states challenged this policy in a lawsuit, claiming that such actions were unlawful and an abuse of power by the administration.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™