Federal judge dismisses Comey, Letitia James indictments


Summary

Indictments tossed

A federal judge has dismissed the indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Ruling

The judge tossed the indictments on the grounds that Lindsey Halligan's appointment as interim U.S. Attorney General for the Eastern District of Virginia was invalid.

What were the charges?

Comey was indicted on one count of making false statements to Congress and one count of obstruction of justice. James was indicted on one count of bank fraud and one count of making false statements to a financial institution.


Full story

A federal judge has dismissed the indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. The judge tossed the indictments on the grounds that Lindsey Halligan’s appointment as interim U.S. Attorney General for the Eastern District of Virginia was invalid.

“Because Ms. Halligan had no lawful authority to present the indictment, I will grant Mr. Comey’s motion and dismiss the indictment without prejudice,” U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie wrote regarding Comey’s indictment.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Currie also noted that Halligan’s actions in bringing the case were “unlawful” and “ineffective.” She issued a similar ruling in the James case.

Both cases were filed without prejudice, meaning they could be brought forward again at a later time.

Halligan’s appointment

In September, Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed Halligan, a former insurance lawyer and close ally of President Donald Trump with no prior prosecutorial experience. Her appointment followed U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert’s abrupt resignation, after he reportedly faced pressure from Trump to pursue investigations targeting political rivals. 

Once she took office, Halligan indicted both James and Comey.

Since then, they have challenged the legitimacy of Halligan’s appointment. They said that because she was improperly installed in the role, she lacked the legal authority to bring charges against them.

Previous charges

The dismissal comes after Comey was indicted in September on one count of making false statements to Congress and one count of obstruction of justice. The charges were tied to Senate testimony he gave five years ago. He pleaded not guilty last month

James was indicted on one count of bank fraud and one count of making false statements to a financial institution. She also pleaded not guilty last month. 

Both claim the sequence of events leading to Halligan’s appointment shows the prosecutions were purely driven by Trump’s personal vendettas. 

Following the ruling on Monday, James shared a post on X, saying, “I am heartened by today’s victory and grateful for the prayers and support I have received from around the country. I remain fearless in the face of these baseless charges as I continue fighting for New Yorkers every single day.”

Jason K. Morrell contributed to this report.
Tags: ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal judge dismissed indictments against James Comey and Letitia James after ruling that the prosecutor who brought the charges was not lawfully appointed, highlighting procedural safeguards in the U.S. legal process and the influence of political appointments.

Legal authority

The court found Lindsey Halligan's appointment as interim US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia invalid, rendering her actions, including the indictments, legally void and emphasizing the procedural requirements in prosecutorial roles.

Political influence

According to those indicted, the sequence of Halligan's appointment and investigation suggested the prosecutions were influenced by the personal interests of President Donald Trump, raising ongoing concerns about politicization of legal processes.

Judicial oversight

Judge Cameron McGowan Currie's decision underscores the judiciary's role in reviewing and checking the actions of prosecutors and executive appointments, ensuring adherence to legal standards and protecting the integrity of the legal system.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the dismissal as a "stunning rebuke" of a "retribution campaign" against "Trump foe" Comey, highlighting "scandals" and political targeting.
  • Media outlets in the center report neutrally on the "unlawful" appointment, uniquely noting charges could be refiled, a detail de-emphasized elsewhere.
  • Media outlets on the right label the judge a "Clinton Judge" and emphasizes the prosecutor was "illegally appointed," implying political bias in the ruling.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

506 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The indictment against James Comey was dismissed because U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie ruled that Lindsey Halligan was not lawfully appointed as U.S. Attorney.
  • Comey’s team claimed that Halligan was unqualified due to her appointment method, which was considered in Judge Currie's decision.
  • Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed Halligan on September 22 after Erik Siebert resigned under pressure to prosecute Comey and Letitia James.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Nov. 24, U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed the criminal cases against James Comey and Letitia James after finding the acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia lacked lawful authority.
  • Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed Lindsey Halligan as acting U.S. attorney after Erik Siebert resigned amid reported pressure to pursue charges, with Halligan having no prior prosecutorial experience.
  • Halligan presented cases as the sole prosecutor, and Currie dismissed the indictments because she lacked lawful authority, stating, "I will grant Mr. Comey’s motion and dismiss the indictment without prejudice."
  • The court dismissed the indictments without prejudice, meaning the Justice Department may refile charges, but Comey's lawyers argue the statute of limitations may bar revival.
  • The rulings amount to a rebuke of the Trump administration and add Lindsey Halligan to other interim U.S. attorneys disqualified over appointment methods, despite some courts allowing cases to proceed.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal judge dismissed the indictments against James Comey and Letitia James, citing their illegitimacy due to an unqualified U.S. attorney bringing the charges.
  • Judge Cameron Currie ruled that the charges could be refiled, allowing the Department of Justice the option to appeal.
  • Judge Cameron Currie found that Lindsey Halligan presented the charges alone without proper authority, leading to dismissal without prejudice.
  • James' attorney, Abbe Lowell, claimed Halligan was unauthorized to enter the grand jury rooms during the proceedings.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.