
Federal judge permanently closes NYC Mayor Adams’ corruption case
By Lauren Keenan (Anchor/Reporter), Joey Nunez (Video Editor)
- A federal judge has permanently dismissed the criminal corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The charges, which included bribery and wire fraud, were dropped after the Trump administration’s Department of Justice requested dismissal, citing concerns over Adams enforcing federal immigration policy.
- U.S. District Court Judge Dale E. Ho ruled that dismissing the case without prejudice would suggest a political bargain.
- Adams, who is running for reelection, called the case baseless and welcomed the dismissal.
Full Story
A federal judge has permanently dismissed the criminal corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- The charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams have been dismissed by Judge Dale Ho, who stated that they cannot be brought again due to being "with prejudice."
- The dismissal followed a request from the U.S. Department of Justice, leading to resignations among Adams' inner circle, including four deputy mayors.
- Adams' attorney, Alex Spiro, denied claims of a quid pro quo arrangement involving the Trump administration and the Justice Department.
- The U.S. Department of Justice requested to drop the charges against Adams "without prejudice."
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- New York City Mayor Eric Adams has had his federal corruption case dismissed, allowing him to campaign for reelection without legal threats hanging over him.
- The Department of Justice decided to drop the prosecution, which was criticized as politically motivated by Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove.
- Adams faced charges of bribery and fraud, accused of receiving over $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions, but pleaded not guilty.
- Adams now has less than three months to campaign against a rival who has led in polls this year.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
In September 2024, Adams was indicted on five charges. They include bribery, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and two charges related to receiving campaign contributions from foreign nationals.
The indictment claimed that Adams “solicited and demanded” over $100,000 in bribes, including luxury travel perks from a Turkish official as early as 2016. The official reportedly sought Adams’ assistance with Turkish consulate regulations in Manhattan.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
In January, Adams appeared on the Tucker Carlson Podcast, where he said he felt the Biden administration’s Department of Justice was targeting him over comments he made about the migrant crisis.
“I think there are those within that orbit who felt I was not a good Democrat,” Adams told Carlson. “Because I watched my city, a city that I love, endure the onslaught of migrant and immigration policy, a failed border policy. After 10 trips to Washington, stating that this was a problem costing us a great deal of money — $6.5 billion of our tax dollars — I think some were just angry about it and thought I wasn’t a good Democrat.”
In February, the Trump administration’s Department of Justice asked federal prosecutors to drop the case against the sitting mayor without prejudice, meaning charges could be filed again in the future.
Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove sent a memo to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), stating in part that the Trump administration was concerned about how the prosecution might impact Adams’ ability “to protect the American people from the disastrous effects of unlawful mass migration and resettlement.”
Days later, the SDNY’s top prosecutor, Danielle Sassoon, resigned after refusing to comply with Bove’s orders.
In a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Sassoon stated the government had no valid basis for seeking the dismissal. Sassoon wrote, “Rather than be rewarded, Adams’s advocacy should be called out for what it is: An improper offer of immigration enforcement assistance in exchange for a dismissal of his case.”
In other words, Sassoon criticized the DOJ’s orders to drop Adams’ case as “quid pro quo,” meaning if the indictment against Adams were dismissed, Adams would help the federal government with its immigration enforcement policies.
On Wednesday, April 2, U.S. District Court Judge Dale E. Ho ordered the case dismissed with prejudice, so the federal government cannot bring the charges against Adams in the future.
In his decision, the judge stated that dismissing the case without prejudice could suggest that the mayor’s freedom depends on enforcing Trump’s immigration priorities, making him appear more aligned with federal demands than his constituents’ wishes.
“Everything here smacks of a bargain: dismissal of the indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions,” the judge wrote.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Adams reacted to the news Wednesday afternoon.
“As I’ve said all along, this case should have never been brought, and I did nothing wrong,” Adams said. “I’m now happy that our city can finally close the book on this and focus solely on the future of our great city.”
Adams is running for reelection this year, and according to Data for Progress, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is currently leading the incumbent mayor, polling at 39% compared to Adams’ 7%.
New York City’s mayoral primary is June 24.
A FEDERAL JUDGE PERMANENTLY DISMISSES THE CRIMINAL CORRUPTION CASE AGAINST NEW YORK CITY MAYOR ERIC ADAMS.
IN SEPTEMBER 2024, ADAMS WAS INDICTED ON FIVE CHARGES, INCLUDING: BRIBERY, WIRE FRAUD, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT WIRE FRAUD, AND TWO CHARGES RELATING TO RECEIVING CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS FROM FOREIGN NATIONALS.
THE INDICTMENT CLAIMS ADAMS “SOLICITED AND DEMANDED” OVER $100,000 IN BRIBES, INCLUDING LUXURY TRAVEL PERKS FROM A TURKISH OFFICIAL AS EARLY AS 2016. THE OFFICIAL REPORTEDLY SOUGHT ADAMS’ ASSISTANCE WITH TURKISH CONSULATE REGULATIONS IN MANHATTAN.
IN JANUARY, MAYOR ADAMS APPEARED ON THE TUCKER CARLSON PODCAST SAYING HE FELT AS THOUGH THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WAS TARGETING HIM OVER COMMENTS HE MADE ABOUT THE MIGRANT CRISIS.
“I THINK THERE ARE THOSE WITHIN THAT ORBIT WHO FELT I WAS NOT A GOOD DEMOCRAT,” ADAMS TOLD CARLSON. “BECAUSE I WATCHED MY CITY, A CITY THAT I LOVE, ENDURE THE ONSLAUGHT OF MIGRANT AND IMMIGRATION POLICY, A FAILED BORDER POLICY. AFTER TEN TRIPS TO WASHINGTON, STATING THAT THIS WAS A PROBLEM COSTING US A GREAT DEAL OF MONEY—$6.5 BILLION OF OUR TAX DOLLARS—I THINK SOME WERE JUST ANGRY ABOUT IT AND THOUGHT I WASN’T A GOOD DEMOCRAT.”
THEN, IN FEBRUARY, THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ASKED FEDERAL PROSECUTORS TO DROP THE CASE AGAINST THE SITTING MAYOR – WITHOUT PREJUDICE – MEANING, CHARGES COULD BE RE-FILED IN THE FUTURE.
ACTING DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL EMIL BOVE SENT A MEMO TO THE U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, STATING IN PART, THAT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WAS CONCERNED WITH HOW THE PROSECUTION MAY IMPACT MAYOR ADAMS’ ABILITY “TO PROTECT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FROM THE DISASTROUS EFFECTS OF UNLAWFUL MASS MIGRATION AND RESETTLEMENT.”
DAYS LATER, THE SDNY’S TOP PROSECUTOR, DANIELLE SASSON, RESIGNED HER POSITION AFTER REFUSING TO COMPLY WITH BOVE’S ORDERS.
IN A LETTER TO ATTORNEY GENERAL PAM BONDI, SASSOON STATED THE GOVERNMENT HAD NO VALID BASIS FOR SEEKING THE DISMISSAL, WRITING: “RATHER THAN BE REWARDED, ADAMS’S ADVOCACY SHOULD BE CALLED OUT FOR WHAT IT IS: AN IMPROPER OFFER OF IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE IN EXCHANGE FOR A DISMISSAL OF HIS CASE.”
IN OTHER WORDS, SASSOON CRITIQUED THE DOJ’S ORDERS TO DROP ADAMS’S CASE AS “QUID-PRO-QUO” MEANING IF THE INDICTMENT AGAINST ADAMS WAS DISMISSED, THEN ADAMS WOULD HELP THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WITH ITS IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT POLICIES.
ON WEDNESDAY, US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DALE E. HO ORDERED THE CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE – MEANING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CANNOT BRING THE CHARGES AGAINST ADAMS IN THE FUTURE.
IN HIS DECISION, THE JUDGE SAID THAT DISMISSING THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE COULD SUGGEST THAT THE MAYOR’S FREEDOM DEPENDS ON ENFORCING TRUMP’S IMMIGRATION PRIORITIES, MAKING HIM APPEAR MORE ALIGNED WITH FEDERAL DEMANDS THAN HIS CONSTITUENTS’ WISHES.
“EVERYTHING HERE SMACKS OF A BARGAIN: DISMISSAL OF THE INDICTMENT IN EXCHANGE FOR IMMIGRATION POLICY CONCESSIONS,” THE JUDGE WROTE.
MAYOR ADAMS REACTED TO THE NEWS WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON.
“AS I’VE SAID ALL ALONG, THIS CASE SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN BROUGHT AND I DID NOTHING WRONG,” ADAMS SAID. “I’M NOW HAPPY THAT OUR CITY CAN FINALLY CLOSE THE BOOK ON THIS AND FOCUS SOLELY ON THE FUTURE OF OUR GREAT CITY.”
MAYOR ADAMS IS RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION THIS YEAR AND ACCORDING TO DATA FOR PROGRESS, FORMER NEW YORK GOVERNOR ANDREW CUOMO IS LEADING THE INCUMBENT MAYOR, POLLING AT 39% COMPARED TO ADAMS’ 7%.
NEW YORK CITY’S PRIMARY IS SET FOR JUNE 24TH.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- The charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams have been dismissed by Judge Dale Ho, who stated that they cannot be brought again due to being "with prejudice."
- The dismissal followed a request from the U.S. Department of Justice, leading to resignations among Adams' inner circle, including four deputy mayors.
- Adams' attorney, Alex Spiro, denied claims of a quid pro quo arrangement involving the Trump administration and the Justice Department.
- The U.S. Department of Justice requested to drop the charges against Adams "without prejudice."
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- New York City Mayor Eric Adams has had his federal corruption case dismissed, allowing him to campaign for reelection without legal threats hanging over him.
- The Department of Justice decided to drop the prosecution, which was criticized as politically motivated by Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove.
- Adams faced charges of bribery and fraud, accused of receiving over $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions, but pleaded not guilty.
- Adams now has less than three months to campaign against a rival who has led in polls this year.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Kevin Carter/Getty Images
DHL suspends global shipments of more than $800 to US customers
Watch 2:054 hrs ago -
Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
Sensitive docs including WH floor plans shared with thousands: Report
Watch 2:427 hrs ago -
FPG via Getty Images
China tests hydrogen-based bomb that burns hotter, longer than TNT
Watch 2:397 hrs ago -
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
El Salvador offers prisoner swap to Venezuela involving US deportees
Watch 1:0810 hrs ago