Federal judge rules family of Boulder firebombing suspect can be deported


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Family can be deported

A federal judge ruled that the family of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, accused in a fatal firebombing in Boulder, Colorado, can legally be deported.

Family illegally in US

The family entered the U.S. legally in 2022 but overstayed their visas and are not eligible for expedited removal.

Suspect pleads not guilty

Soliman has pleaded not guilty to federal hate crime and murder charges, and his family has not been charged.


Full story

A federal judge ruled that authorities can deport the family of the man accused in last month’s deadly firebombing attack in Boulder, Colorado. Authorities accused Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, of throwing Molotov cocktails at people protesting to raise awareness about Israeli hostages in Gaza.

Prosecutors said Monday, June 30, that an 82-year-old woman injured during the firebombing has died from her injuries. Federal officials charged Soliman with a hate crime, multiple counts of murder and attempted murder.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Family detained by immigration agents

On June 3, two days after the attack, federal immigration agents detained Soliman’s wife, Hayam El Gamal, and five children. Soliman is originally from Egypt, and officials with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security say he had been living in the U.S. illegally.

“They could be deported as early as tonight,” the White House posted to social media June 3. That’s when U.S. District Court Judge Gordon P. Gallagher halted the family’s deportation.

Family lawsuit dismissed by federal judge

Soliman’s family filed a lawsuit to fight their detention by immigration authorities. U.S. District Judge Orlando L. Garcia rejected the lawsuit and ruled the government can deport the family. However, they can’t deport the family through the fast-track process known as “expedited removal.”

The government argues that detaining the family is legal because they allegedly remained in the U.S. after their visas expired.

Judge Garcia acknowledged that Gamal and her children have lived in the United States for more than two years, and U.S. immigration law generally bars expedited removal for people who have been in the country that long. Instead, the law requires that they receive a regular court proceeding.

According to the judge’s ruling, the government conceded that the family is not eligible for “expedited” removal proceedings.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem stated that investigators will examine whether Soliman’s family had prior knowledge of the planned attack. However, officials have not accused the family of any involvement or charged them with any crime related to the incident.

Soliman has formally told the court he pleads not guilty, and the case will go to trial unless there’s a plea deal.

Joey Nunez (Video Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

The case involving Mohamed Sabry Soliman and his family's detention and deportation proceedings highlights the legal and procedural complexities surrounding both hate crime investigations and U.S. immigration enforcement.

Immigration law enforcement

The story underscores the impact of immigration laws and procedures on families, particularly when those families are connected to high-profile criminal investigations.

Due process

Legal distinctions between expedited removal and standard court proceedings demonstrate the importance of due process protections for individuals facing deportation.

Hate crime investigation

The accusations and subsequent legal actions against Mohamed Sabry Soliman bring attention to how hate crimes are prosecuted and the broader community and governmental responses to such incidents.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 107 media outlets

Context corner

This case unfolds against the backdrop of ongoing debates in the U.S. over immigration, deportation policies, and the handling of individuals related to those involved in violent crimes. The incident occurred during heightened tensions due to international conflicts, fueling public outrage and intensifying scrutiny of the immigration system and hate crime prosecutions.

History lesson

Historically, U.S. immigration law has provided for removal of those who overstay visas, but cases involving relatives of criminal suspects have been contentious. In prior incidents, courts have upheld the need for due process in removal proceedings and have often scrutinized claims of punitive detention against family members.

Policy impact

Judge Garcia’s decision reinforces that removal proceedings for long-term U.S. residents must follow standard legal protocols and due process, rather than expedited removal. This sets an example for how immigration cases tied to high-profile crimes should proceed, impacting future handling of similar detentions and affirming the role of judicial oversight in deportation cases.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the judge’s decision to end the order blocking deportation by emphasizing the family’s legal plight and casting detention as potentially punitive, using sympathetic language like “blocking deportation” to suggest protection of immigrant rights.
  • Media outlets in the center adopt a neutral, procedural tone focusing on due process and legal outcomes, de-emphasizing emotive framing.
  • Media outlets on the right employ inflammatory rhetoric, branding Soliman as a “lunatic jihadist” or “terror suspect” and highlighting his “antisemitic” motives, portraying deportation as a rightful punishment and stressing security concerns with terms like “rightfully in ICE custody.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

117 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal judge ended the deportation block for Hayam El Gamal and her five children, stating they are not eligible for expedited deportation due to their two years in the U.S.
  • The family was detained on June 3 after Mohamed Sabry Soliman was charged with a firebomb attack that injured 13 and led to the death of an 82-year-old woman.
  • The family's attorney expressed hope for their release from the detention center amid ongoing deportation proceedings.
  • The family now faces regular deportation proceedings after a judge determined there was no reason to block their deportation any longer.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A federal judge ordered that the family of Mohamed Sabry Soliman can be deported, dismissing their challenge.
  • U.S. District Judge Orlando L. Garcia stated that the court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss the case without prejudice.
  • The ruling confirmed that the family, ages 4 to 18, are not eligible for expedited deportations.
  • The court found that the Soliman family is receiving the correct process under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal judge ruled that the family of Mohamed Sabry Soliman can be deported after dismissing their challenge to the removal order, as they are not facing expedited removal proceedings and the court lacked jurisdiction over the case.
  • Soliman faces multiple charges, including first-degree murder and hate crimes, after allegedly attacking a pro-Israel rally in Boulder, Colorado, where one victim, an 82-year-old woman, has died from her injuries.
  • Hayam El Gamal and her five children have been detained properly due to overstaying their visas.
  • Federal authorities confirmed that Soliman's family lived in the U.S. Illegally, and the Trump administration's procedures for deportation were upheld by the ruling.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™