Federal judge says Trump admin can’t fire federal employees during shutdown


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Blocked

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from firing federal employees during the ongoing government shutdown.

Extended

The ruling came after unions filed a lawsuit arguing the firings were illegal and intended to pressure Congress.

Protected

The injunction protects workers until the case is resolved.


Full story

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that the Trump administration cannot proceed with firing federal employees during the government shutdown, The Associated Press reports. While shutdowns typically result in some workers being furloughed without pay, the administration had planned permanent job cuts; however, the court has blocked the effort, for now.

U.S. District Judge Susan Yvonne Illston from the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction that temporarily stops the government from firing federal employees, as a lawsuit over those firings is pending.

Before the injunction, Illston had issued a short-term order on Oct. 15 to prevent the firings, but that order was set to expire on Wednesday. The preliminary injunction extends that protection until the case is fully resolved.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Unions challenge administration’s actions

Two major labor unions –– the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) –– filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s plan to fire federal employees during the shutdown, before the shutdown started on Oct. 1.

In the suit, the unions argue that these federal firings are not legitimate, but rather an abuse of authority intended to punish federal workers and pressure Congress during the government shutdown.

In her Oct. 15 ruling, Illston indicated she believes the evidence will likely show that these mass firings were illegal and went beyond the administration’s authority.

Lee Saunders, the president of AFSCME, supported the judge’s recent ruling, writing on X: “Today’s ruling is another victory for federal workers and our ongoing efforts to protect their jobs from an administration hellbent on illegally firing them.”

Meanwhile, the AFGE national union praised the ruling as a “big win for federal workers!”

In a post on X, the union wrote, “A federal judge just issued a preliminary injunction in our lawsuit, ruling that Trump administration cannot illegally fire federal workers during the government shutdown.”

Context of the shutdown and federal employee cuts

Illston issued the preliminary injunction 28 days into the government shutdown, which currently shows no sign of ending.

Reducing the number of federal employees has been a priority for the Trump administration ever since President Donald Trump’s second term began.

Trump tapped billionaire Elon Musk to run DOGE, also known as the Department of Government Efficiency, and fired tens of thousands of federal workers during his first few months back in the White House.

Alex Delia (Deputy Managing Editor) and Drew Pittock (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal judge has barred the Trump administration from firing federal employees during the ongoing government shutdown, highlighting the legal and political battles over the use of mass layoffs as leverage in budget disputes.

Legal authority

Federal courts are actively reviewing whether the executive branch has the authority to carry out permanent layoffs during a government shutdown, shaping future boundaries for presidential powers over the federal workforce.

Labor unions

Major labor unions are contesting the administration's layoffs, arguing they are an abuse of power and politically motivated, which elevates the role of organized labor and worker protections in high-stakes governmental policy decisions.

Government shutdown

The ongoing shutdown, caused by budget disagreements in Congress, has left thousands of workers in a precarious position and illustrates the broader social and economic consequences of prolonged federal funding lapses.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 87 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Reports state that about 4,100 layoff notices have been sent to federal employees since Oct. 10, primarily targeting departments like education and health.

Context corner

The United States government has faced shutdowns before, typically due to an impasse over federal budget negotiations between the executive branch and Congress. Previous shutdowns have led to furloughs and delayed pay for federal employees.

History lesson

The longest U.S. government shutdown lasted 35 days during Trump's first term and also resulted from disputes over budget priorities. Shutdowns have historically led to short-term disruption and political confrontation but are typically resolved through negotiation.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left emphasize the judge "blocking Trump from using shutdown to fire anyone he wants," highlighting the firings as "arbitrary and politically motivated" and "illegal," often using strong terms like "bans."
  • Media outlets in the center provide specific figures, noting "over 4,000 workers" impacted, and present the judge's nominator factually, avoiding the Left's interpretive framing or the Right's partisan attacks.
  • Media outlets on the right politicize the event, labeling the judiciary with "Clinton Judge" and assigning blame for the government shutdown with "Schumer Shutdown," de-emphasizing the judge's legal reasoning.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

131 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.